Adjustment to the dissolution of a romantic relationship: effects of ex-relationship specific thought content valence

Capstones, Theses and
Dissertations

Adjustment to the dissolution of a romantic
relationship: outcomes of ex-relationship specific
thought content material materials valence

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Net web page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….. iii
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. iv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………. 1
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW …………………………………………………….. 10
Romantic Relationship Outcomes…………………………………………………………….. 11
Love and Dissolution Theories………………………………………………………………… 13
Obsession ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 16
Thought Content material materials Valence ……………………………………………………………………….. 19
The Current Look at………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
Evaluation Hypotheses……………………………………………………………………………… 31
CHAPTER Three METHODS ………………………………………………………………………… 32
Power Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………… 32
Members……………………………………………………………………………………………. 32
Look at Design…………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
Measures………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
Course of ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………….. 39
Manipulation Confirm……………………………………………………………………………….. 39
Important Analyses…………………………………………………………………………………… 39
CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………………. 50
Limitations ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 53
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56
REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………………………… 58
APPENDIX A EXPERIMENTAL MEASURES…………………………………………… 71
APPENDIX B IRB APPROVAL………………………………………………………………… 76
APPENDIX C WRITING INSTRUCTIONS ……………………………………………….. 77
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr. David Vogel, my principal professor, is the one who I’ve to thank first and
foremost for his fastened assist with my thesis and my graduate school career. I am
extraordinarily fortunate to have a mentor who helps me in all factors of my expert
enchancment and encourages me to take the evaluation avenue a lot much less traveled. I am grateful to Dr.
Stephanie Madon for her enthusiasm and thoughts in serving to me improve the design of this
analysis mission and, further broadly, growing my understanding of experimental design. I
thank Dr. Fred Lorenz for his warmth and assist in fairly a couple of factors of my graduate
school career, collectively along with his help with the statistical analyses involved on this thesis.
In addition to, I need to particular my gratitude to Daniel Lannin and Joseph
Hammer for his or her continued mentorship and friendship. I’m fortunate to have such gifted and
thoughtful place fashions. I might moreover thank Lauren, a uncommon specific individual and my greatest
pal, for her unwavering assist and comic help. I moreover need to acknowledge Laura
Smalarz for her unofficial mentorship and for listening to all of my ideas, throughout
the highest.
Lastly, and largely importantly, I need to provide my deepest appreciation to my
family for his or her numerous love and assist. I thank my dad for encouraging me to always ask
“why”, and my mom for instilling the vanity in me to attempt to uncover out. I thank my
youthful brother Dov for being my favorite and most ironic provide of sanity. Ultimate, I thank my
big brother Michael. You are my greatest inspiration. Every diploma I earn is yours.
iv
ABSTRACT
The intention of this evaluation was to take a look at the quick outcomes of partaking in
predominantly positively or predominantly negatively valenced critical about one’s most
present romantic ex-relationship and assess whether or not or not these outcomes are distinctive from contemplating
about recollections from a non-romantic relationship. The equipment of self-regulation thought
contained in the context of rumination and romantic relationship breakups signifies that recalling
optimistic recollections from a relationship may make it more durable to maneuver on from the
relationship that ended, whereas recalling unfavourable recollections may make shifting on less complicated.
Members had been instructed to place in writing a couple of relationship memory, with experimental
manipulations of the memory valence (optimistic vs. unfavourable) and relationship type (exrelationship vs. friendship). Variations in finish consequence measures associated to adaptive and
adversarial breakup adjustment had been subsequently examined. It was predicted that negatively
valenced writing would yield elevated scores of adaptive adjustment measures and reduce
scores of adversarial adjustment measures amongst members inside the ex-relationship scenario,
nevertheless yield lower scores of adaptive adjustment and higher scores on adversarial adjustment
amongst members inside the friendship scenario. Outcomes partially supported the hypotheses;
participant scores of adaptive outcomes had been elevated inside the unfavourable ex-relationship scenario
relative to the optimistic ex-relationship scenario, and members inside the optimistic friendship
scenario elevated scores compared with these inside the unfavourable friendship scenario. No
vital variations had been found with regard to adversarial outcomes.
Key phrases: romantic relationship breakups, thought content material materials valence, breakups,
obsession
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
“The place you was as soon as, there is a hole on this planet, which I uncover myself persistently strolling
spherical inside the daytime, and falling in at night time time. I miss you need hell.”
-Edna St. Vincent Millay, Letters (1892-1950)
After the unwelcomed end of a romantic relationship, individuals are oftentimes inundated
with a deep unhappiness and glued, obsessive longing for his or her misplaced beloved. Unable to eat, sleep,
or take into accounts the remainder, the dissolution of a romantic relationship is doubtless some of the
distressing events an grownup can experience (Monroe, Rohde, Seeley, & Lewinsohn, 1999; Sbarra,
2006; Slotter, Gardner, & Finkel, 2010). Most individuals will endure as a minimum one painful
romantic breakup of their lifetime (Battaglia, Richard, Datteri, and Lord, 1998) accompanied by
potential deleterious responses comparable to principal despair, nervousness, insomnia, mood swings,
obsessive concepts, and better risk for suicide (see Self-discipline, 2011, for a overview). Although a
burgeoning area of research curiosity, the extant literature predominantly focuses on describing
the unfavourable outcomes associated to romantic breakups or determining the weather that
predispose individuals to develop unfavourable outcomes as quickly as a relationship ends (Davis, Shaver, &
Vernon, 2003). However, surprisingly little is known about what responses are adaptive in recovering
from this devastating experience. The current evaluation intends to deal with this omission by
inspecting doubtlessly differential outcomes of every optimistic and unfavourable recollections of a romantic
relationship on optimistic and unfavourable adjustment outcomes following a breakup.
Breakup Thought Content material materials and Valence
The highest of a romantic relationship typically entails a separation from a beloved one. As a
finish consequence, obsession in direction of the ex-partner and/or ex-relationship is frequent, notably when this
2
dissolution is undesired (Self-discipline, Diego, Pelaez, Deeds, & Delgado, 2009). Intensely craving the
affection of our beloved, obsessive behaviors after a breakup are properly documented comparable to
sending undesirable presents, cellphone calls, textual content material messages, expressions of affection (Dutton &
Winstead, 2003), and even stalking (Fremouw, Westrup, & Pennebaker, 1997; Haugaard & Seri,
2003). Whereas a couple of of those behaviors are further extreme, some stage of obsessive contemplating is
typically expert by almost all individuals experiencing a romantic relationship breakup
(Self-discipline et al., 2009).
Rumination and psychological nicely being researchers make clear obsessive focus via the
software program of self-regulation thought. Self-regulation thought (Carver & Scheier, 1981, 1998;
Duval & Wicklund, 1972) discusses a wide range of processes involved in self-regulatory
conduct, cognitions, and affect. Inside self-regulation thought, self-focused consideration is one
computerized course of used to keep up a person on observe in pursuit of important goals by informing selfregulatory conduct. When a behavioral regular is salient, a person compares whether or not or not their
current state meets their current regular, or desired state. If the current state meets or exceeds
the standard, a person ceases self-regulation processes and self-focused consideration because of the
objective is met. A discrepancy between the current state and current regular could also be accompanied
by feelings of distress, which has been thought of as a motivational machine in partaking in discrepancyreducing conduct (Carver & Scheier, 1981, 1998; Duval & Wicklund, 1972). Definitely, if the
current situation would not meet the standard, some theorists (Carver & Scheier, 1998) contend
that a person will each intentionally work together their conduct with a objective to reduce this discrepancy,
or cease pursuing their objective if the prospect of accomplishing the current regular is low.
Researchers of rumination and psychological nicely being have extended this concept, and observe that in further
personally associated conditions, comparable to a hurtful breakup, obsessive contemplating and the related
Three
distress will proceed even when the prospect of meeting the aim is low (Nolen-Hoeksema,
Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008; Pyszczynski & Greenberg, 1987). Utilized to breakups, if a
specific individual experiences an unwelcomed end to their romantic relationship, obsessive contemplating outcomes
from the discrepancy between no longer worrying in a romantic relationship with their expartner (i.e., their current state) no matter their need to be romantically involved with their expartner (i.e., their desired state). Definitely, researchers have demonstrated that increased obsessive
contemplating is expounded to increased distress, confusion, stress, and despair (Collins & Clark,
1989; Davis et al., 2003; Feeney & Noller, 1992), along with worse emotional adjustment and
increased ranges of stress (Fagundes, 2012; Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007).
Previous determining obsessive contemplating as a typical, unpleasant by-product
accompanying the highest of a romantic relationship, nonetheless, little growth has been made in
the romantic relationship dissolution literature to know the content material materials of the concepts
themselves. However, individuals can alter their current psychological state via subjective thought.
As an example, imagining the presence of an important specific individual, comparable to a gift or ex-romantic
companion, can elicit the identical experience to their exact presence inside the quick second
(Fitzsimons & Bargh, 2003). In a earlier fMRI analysis determining areas of the thoughts
underlying romantic love (Aron et al., 2005), by imagining their current companion, passionately-inlove members expert thoughts train inside the ventral tegmental area (VTA), identical to
receiving their companion’s affection particularly individual. The ventral tegmental area (VTA) is the center of
the thoughts’s reward system, accountable for the euphoria expert with romantic love and
cocaine, along with the obsessive behaviors that accompany behavior. These related areas moreover
confirmed train in a separate analysis the place members had been injected with cocaine (Breiter et al.,
1997).
4
One different important facet that shapes our current experience all through memory recall is
content material materials valence (Segerstrom, Stanton, Alden, & Shortridge, 2003). Imagining a positively
valenced event typically improves mood, whereas imagining a negatively valenced event
worsens it (Mather, 2006). Findings present optimistic memory recall as a sort of emotional
regulation to spice up mood (Joormann & Siemer, 2004), and that these which are more likely to take care of
unfavourable concepts often are likely to endure from despair (Josephson, Singer, & Salovey,
1996). Segerstrom and colleagues (2003) extended this understanding to the long-term by
inspecting elements of repetitive thought. They acknowledged content material materials valence as a sturdy
dimension of repetitive thought, the place optimistic and unfavourable content material materials valence are associated to
a optimistic and unfavourable have an effect on, respectively, on finish consequence variables comparable to affect,
physiological nicely being, and psychological functioning. Extending previous its have an effect on on one’s
current, subjective state, unfavourable or optimistic thought content material materials pertaining to a specific object can
type the appraisal or which signifies that’s hooked as much as it (Segerstrom et al., 2003). This has been
demonstrated inside the context of romantic relationships. In a single analysis, members recalling
optimistic autobiographical recollections about their current romantic relationship expert a
subsequent improve inside the perceived warmth of their relationship (Alea & Bluck, 2007).
Equally, couples reminiscing a couple of earlier experience involving shared laughter reported
subsequent will improve of their relationship satisfaction (Bazzini, Stack, Martincin, & Davis, 2007).
Philippe, Koestner, & Lekes (2013) posit that frequent activation of couple-related recollections,
and thus the sentiments associated to them, can info worldwide attitudes and conduct in direction of a
romantic relationship as a sort of appraisal. Nonetheless, Philippe and colleagues solely thought-about
how these outcomes pertainto current romantic relationships and by no means earlier ones.
5
Whatever the substantial have an effect on of content material materials on psychological nicely being and intimate relationships,
optimistic and unfavourable thought content material materials valence—or, further exactly, the existence of optimistic
content material materials valence—after a romantic relationship ends has solely currently been considerably thought-about.
In reality, response mannequin theorists have tended to suggest that thought content material materials is always unfavourable
when an individual is distressed because of every unfavourable thought content material materials and rumination, primarily probably the most
studied kind of obsessive contemplating, have been confirmed to negatively affect adjustment (NolenHoeksema et al., 2008). Due to this, romantic relationship dissolution analysis typically perform
under the thought(s) that the content material materials of concepts and recollections after a breakup are unfavourable
and/or pertain to the breakup itself (e.g., Boelen & Reijntjes, 2009; Fagundes, 2012; Kross et al.,
2011; Lewandowski, 2009), failing to consider the existence of positively valenced relationshiprelevant content material materials.
Quite a lot of analysis have provided proof that valence points. A present scale enchancment
analysis demonstrated that an individual’s concepts after a relationship breakup might comprise every
optimistic and unfavourable content material materials (Brenner & Vogel, 2015). Outcomes from this analysis moreover
demonstrated that further frequent optimistic concepts regarding the ex-relationship had been associated to
worse adjustment outcomes, whereas further unfavourable concepts regarding the ex-relationship was
associated to increased adjustment outcomes. In an fMRI analysis of individuals distressed about
their breakup, when requested to think about their beloved ex-partner, members described every
unhappy and utterly happy recollections (Fisher et al., 2010). Per the subjective power of our
recollections, notably with individuals holding good significance to us, outcomes demonstrated
train related to strategies of drug behavior, supporting the rivalry that love is an behavior,
and romantic breakups usually is a sort of drug withdrawal (Fisher, 2004; Fisher et al., 2010). In
one different fMRI analysis of romantic relationship breakups, rejected-in-love members had been
6
significantly requested to take care of a tragic thought. On this analysis members did not current activation in
the reward strategies thoughts space (Najib et al., 2004), and instead demonstrated deactivation in
positive areas activated inside the Fisher et al. (2010) analysis.
Researchers have speculated why there was this distinction in parts of the thoughts activated,
because of members in every analysis thought of their ex-partner. Although they have not found
a conclusive clarification, I posit that this distinction lies inside the content material materials of their concepts and,
in distinction to earlier analysis on content material materials valence, that optimistic thought content material materials is certainly maladaptive
to breakup restoration. If critical about an important specific individual elicits an experience identical to
their bodily presence, and if breakups really are a sort of behavior, then a positively valenced
thought or memory might induce the non everlasting however extremely efficient feeling of experiencing an expartner’s affection. This may moreover make clear why members, who oscillated from utterly happy to
unhappy memory recollection in Fisher and colleagues’ analysis, confirmed indicators of drug extreme as properly
as craving whereas members in Najib and colleagues’ (2004) analysis, who thought of their
grief, did not current indicators of behavior or craving. If an individual experiences “withdrawal” from
their ex-partner’s love, utilizing optimistic recollections may provide help however moreover perform
unintentional reappraisal of the ex-partner.
Although Philippe and colleagues’ (2013) postulation about romantic thought content material materials and
appraisal pertained solely to those at current in a romantic relationship, predicting relationship
persistence sooner than termination, relationship memory content material materials may proceed to have an effect on people’s
outcomes after a relationship ends. From the self-regulation theories perspective, reinforcing
need for an ex-partner, and thus sustaining the discrepancy between an individual’s current state
and desired state, might make it more durable to maneuver on and accept the breakup. In numerous
phrases, an individual who thinks about relationship-positive experiences, whereas feeling increased in
7
the second attributable to an instantaneous low cost in unfavourable feelings, might actually be a lot much less eager to
accept the breakup and thus have increased situation shifting on. Conversely, those who suppose
regarding the unfavourable experiences, whereas feeling worse inside the second, might very nicely develop into further
accepting of the breakup.
This potential have an effect on of ex-relationship memory recall on shifting on from an exrelationship differs from the potential have an effect on of various shut relationship memory recall, such
as an in depth friendship, on shifting on from an ex-relationship. Though doubtlessly intimate and
vital, recollections from a friendship mustn’t regarding the ex-relationship and, on account of this reality, do not
straight deal with the current state-desired state discrepancy. Furthermore, in distinction to optimistic exrelationship recollections, critical a few optimistic friendship experience would not be adopted by
being met with a discrepant actuality from the subject of their concepts. In reality, as social assist
contributes to adaptive coping in worrying events (Shulman, 1993), critical a few optimistic
friendship memory might very nicely relate to positively to adjustment outcomes. As such, one might
anticipate that an individual who thinks a couple of optimistic friendship memory all through a difficult time,
comparable to after a breakup, would actually really feel increased inside the second and likewise experience increased adjustment to
their breakup. Equally, critical a few unfavourable memory from a friendship would potential
make an individual actually really feel worse inside the second and instead be maladaptive in direction of breakup
restoration.
Current Look at
Whereas a heartbroken specific individual would not have the drug they crave inside the purest kind (i.e.,
love from their ex-partner), they do have a surplus of a “counterfeit” kind: their recollections. The
obsessive nature of optimistic concepts, for example, may make it troublesome to maneuver on from a
beloved ex-partner notably if the intense about and, in flip, reappraisal, of the ex-
eight
relationship leads one to hold on to the connection. In Fisher and colleagues’ (2010) analysis,
members relived utterly happy and sad experiences from the connection, eliciting the reward,
craving, and grief evident inside the fMRI; nonetheless, when members in a single different analysis had been
instructed to elucidate a tragic thought, which is doubtlessly further of a process-type thought as
in opposition to reliving a specific memory, outcomes indicated deactivations in these thoughts areas
(Najib et al., 2004). I contend that these drastically utterly totally different findings between each analysis
resulted from drastically utterly totally different thought content material materials of their members.
Not too way back, Brenner & Vogel (2015) demonstrated the tendency for individuals to
reminisce about optimistic and unfavourable concepts involving their ex-relationship, and degree to
doubtlessly differing outcomes based mostly totally on the diploma to which one thinks about positively and
negatively valenced relationship thought content material materials mainly. Immediate, state-induced responses,
nonetheless, have not however been explored. Inside the current experimental analysis, I meant to fill this gap
inside the literature by inspecting the quick have an effect on of optimistic and unfavourable thought content material materials
on mood and restoration from romantic relationship dissolution. Members had been randomly
assigned to one amongst four circumstances, writing about each: positively valenced concepts about an
ex-relationship, negatively valenced concepts about an ex-relationship, positively valenced
concepts a couple of friendship, or negatively valenced concepts a couple of friendship. The friendship
scenario was included with a objective to parse out whether or not or not seen patterns between optimistic versus
unfavourable valence memory circumstances could possibly be the attributable to valence outcomes mainly or attributable to
valence outcomes inside the context of ex-relationship recollections significantly. Following this writing
job, members indicated their current affect (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), self-concept
readability (Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007), and adjustment to the breakup (Saffrey & Ehrenberg,
2007) using self-report measures.
9
It was hypothesized that members who wrote about positively valenced concepts
regarding their ex-relationship would experience a lot much less rediscovery of self-concept and optimistic
adjustment, and better lack of self-concept and unfavourable modify post-writing compared with these
who wrote about negatively valenced ex-relationship thought content material materials. Within the meantime, the opposite
have an effect on was hypothesized for a lot of who wrote a couple of friendship; members who wrote about
positively valenced concepts a couple of friendship had been anticipated to experience increased rediscovery
of self-concept and optimistic adjustment, and fewer lack of self-concept and unfavourable adjustment
post-writing compared with those who wrote about negatively valenced ex-relationship thought
content material materials. Moreover, it was hypothesized that members who wrote about positively valenced
concepts, irrespective of relationship type would experience increased optimistic affect and fewer
unfavourable affect post-writing compared with those who wrote about negatively valenced exrelationship thought content material materials. If valence influences breakup-related outcomes in reverse
directions, this could possibly be the strongest proof for the notion of the distinctive impression of content material materials
valence. Particularly, that contained in the context of ex-romantic relationships, positively valenced
concepts are further detrimental and fewer useful for psychological nicely being and well-being in distinction
with negatively valenced concepts.
10
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Most adults experience a romantic relationship breakup as a minimum as quickly as of their lifetime
(Battaglia et al., 1998), and evaluation has demonstrated the probably devastating affect on
one’s bodily and emotional nicely being (Kloss & Lisman, 2002; Monroe et al.,1999; Sbarra, 2006;
Slotter et al., 2010). Evaluation to date has predominantly sought to find out specific indicators
(i.e., sleep disturbance, despair, nervousness) or traits (i.e., attachment mannequin, stage of
emotional involvement) associated to increased distress. Nonetheless, almost no consideration has
focused on understanding specific individual responses to a breakup and the best way these responses can
mitigate or exacerbate this distress or help us to maneuver on. One response to a unfavourable event that
individuals typically work together in is an obsessive take care of factors related to the unfavourable event.
Definitely, a typical breakup response is to obsessively take into accounts the ex-relationship, and better
obsession is linked to worse outcomes (Self-discipline et al., 2009; Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007).
Researchers have examined adaptive and maladaptive choices of obsessive contemplating mainly;
nonetheless, utterly totally different choices of this obsessive focus, comparable to optimistic and unfavourable content material materials valence,
have not been examined inside the context of romantic relationship breakups. The aim of this
evaluation is to take a look at this opportunity that utterly totally different choices may end up in utterly totally different outcomes.
As this generally is a newer area of research, the hypotheses had been formulated via integration of
interdisciplinary evaluation on factors of breakups, love, obsession, and valence of thought.
Accordingly, to present the hypotheses and design of the current analysis in a coherent technique, the
chapter first evaluations the literature in each of four these domains individually and concludes by
connecting them to an unified, overarching thought. Subsequently, the first topic I will overview entails
the deleterious outcomes associated to the highest of a romantic relationship. The second area of
11
the overview covers the current theories regarding the experience of falling in love and going
via a romantic breakup. Third, I will overview the extant literature on obsession and obsessive
concepts about an ex-partner, the latter of which is a typical presentation after an undesirable
romantic relationship breakup (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Palarea, Cohen, & Rohling, 2000;
Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). Lastly, I will speak in regards to the subjective have an effect on of the content material materials
valence of 1’s concepts and the best way this may occasionally more and more affect restoration from a romantic relationship
breakup.
Romantic Relationship Outcomes
The dissolution of a romantic relationship is doubtless some of the distressing events an grownup
can experience, associated to an array of outcomes related to unfavourable adjustment and poor
psychological nicely being. People typically experience feelings of hurt, frustration and loneliness, (Choo,
Levine, & Hatfield, 1996; Sprecher, 1994), mood swings (Sbarra & Emery, 2005), trouble
sleeping, intrusive concepts (Self-discipline et al., 2009), along with despair and nervousness (Boelen &
Reijntjes, 2009). Furthermore, a romantic relationship breakup is predictive of the onset of Important
Depressive Dysfunction (MDD). Monroe et al. (1999) carried out a longitudinal analysis with two time
components, involving 1,470 adolescents with info collected roughly 13.eight months apart.
By way of interviews and analysis, members had been evaluated for despair and totally different
diagnoses. Members moreover crammed out a survey assessing demographic variables, life stress
measures, and depressive indicators. Analyses revealed present romantic relationship
breakup predicted the first onset of Important Depressive Dysfunction over and above the presentation
of subclinical despair at Time 1, and this discovering was fixed all through intercourse.
Although a a lot much less studied evaluation area empirically, the detrimental experience of a
romantic relationship breakup is well-known by the frequently specific individual. In a giant cellphone
12
survey of traumatic events, relationship dissolution was most likely probably the most frequent ‘‘worst
events’’ offered (Frazier & Hurliman, 2001). Moreover, in writing analysis about traumatic
events, many members choose to place in writing about relationship dissolution or difficulties when
given the selection (e.g., Park & Blumberg, 2002; Pennebaker & Beall, 1986; Ullrich &
Lutgendorf, 2002). In a single analysis, relationship points/dissolution was the second most-chosen
topic, preceded solely by demise of a beloved one, and talked about by as a lot as 25% of members (Kloss
& Lisman, 2002).
Whereas determining the unfavourable outcomes associated to romantic breakups has been the
focus of a number of the extant literature, quite a few analysis have moreover focused on determining preexisting risk parts for rising these unfavourable outcomes. As an example, quite a few analysis have
examined the have an effect on of attachment mannequin, and findings level out that increased attachment nervousness
is predictive of post-dissolution distress, despair, and complicated grief (Boelen & Reijntjes,
2009; Davis et al., 2003; Fagundes, 2012; Perrier, Boucher, Etchegary, Sadava, & Molnar,
2010). Moreover, specific individual evaluations of higher relationship satisfaction (Sprecher, Felmlee, Metts,
Fehr, & Vanni, 1998), dedication (Boelen & Reijntjes, 2009), and self-expansion contained in the
relationship (Lewandowski, Aron, Bassis, & Kunak, 2006) are associated to increased breakup
distress. Inside the Self-discipline et al. (2009) analysis, increased breakup distress was present for members who
did not provoke the breakup, for whom the breakup was sudden and stunning, who felt rejected,
who felt betrayed, and who had been in an prolonged relationship. Nonetheless, outcomes on the
rejecter/rejected standing are blended; whereas a the overwhelming majority of analysis level out that the one who
did not end the connection typically experiences significantly increased distress after a relationship
ends (e.g., Boelen & Reintjes, 2009; Collins & Clark, 1989; Perilloux & Buss, 2008), others
found that this did not significantly affect on distress (Tashiro & Frazier, 2003) or restoration
13
(Sbarra, 2006) after relationship ends. Researchers have moreover acknowledged change to the selfconcept as an important, plausible finish consequence after the highest of a romantic relationship
(Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007). Particularly, the highest of a romantic relationship can weaken one’s
self-assurance and understanding of their sense of self, who they’re as a person. In a
longitudinal analysis, school freshman who currently expert a romantic relationship breakup
reported a lot much less readability of their self-concept, and this diminished readability predicted increased emotional
distress (Slotter et al., 2010).
Although these parts are predictive of distress after a romantic relationship ends, most
are present sooner than or by the connection breakup. Surprisingly little is known regarding the
variability inside responses that an individual can administration as quickly because the breakup has occurred, nor
how these responses may differ inside the diploma to which they’re adaptive and maladaptive in
recovering from this devastating experience. In all probability probably the most sturdy predictor of decreased distress
after a breakup appears to be time (e.g., Self-discipline et al., 2009, Fisher et al., 2010; Knox, Zusman,
Kaluzny, & Cooper, 2000; Le, Dove, Agnew, Korn, & Mutso, 2010; Moller, Fouladi, McCarthy,
& Hatch, 2003). To raised understand how responses may be adaptive or maladaptive, it is
important to know the theoretical underpinnings of how love and romantic relationship
dissolution may function, which I present inside the subsequent half.
Love and Dissolution Theories
Among the many many current literature on romantic relationship breakups, two views have
emerged to make clear the experience of emotional distress after romantic relationship dissolution.
As a romantic relationships breakup typically entails a stark separation from a beloved one, the
first thought views heartbreak as a sort of bereavement (Najib et al., 2004; Self-discipline, 2011). Definitely,
individuals affected by a breakup experience indicators identical to the grieving widow or
14
widower comparable to despair, intrusive concepts, sleep disturbances, and immune dysfunction
(Davis et al., 2003; Self-discipline et al., 2009; Prigerson & Jacobs, 2001). To take a look at the bereavement
parallel between breakups and bereavement, Self-discipline et al. (2009) reworked the broadly used
Inventory Refined Grief (ICG; Prigerson et al., 1995) which measures bereavement distress,
to create a Breakup Distress Scale (BDS; Self-discipline et al., 2009). In a sample of 192 school school college students,
these with elevated breakup distress moreover reported increased ranges of despair, nervousness, sleep
disturbances, intrusive concepts, and situation controlling their intrusive concepts. Although
totally different analysis have not examined this conceptualization straight, totally different analysis on breakups have
operated under this grief framework (e.g., Boelen & Reijntjes, 2009; Fagundes, 2012;
Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al., 2000).
The second perspective on romantic breakups depends on theories about love; significantly,
that romantic love is kind of behavior (Fisher, 2004; Fisher et al., 2010; Peele and Brodsky,
1975). This stems from the analogous traits current in these in love and other people with a drug
behavior. When in love, people usually experience euphoria, elevated vitality, obsessive
concepts, intense take care of the companion, lack of urge for meals, and emotional dependence (GriffinShelley, 1991; Halpern, 1982; Liebowitz, 1983; Mellody et al., 1992; Peele and Brodsky, 1975;
Schaef 1989; Tennov, 1979). Moreover, in fMRI analysis of romantic love, areas of the thoughts
associated to cocaine extreme and craving had been moreover affected by intercourse, love, and attachment. For
occasion, when passionately-in-love members had been instructed to consider their romantic
companion, researchers found the equivalent sturdy correlates particularly thoughts train to those injected
with cocaine (Aron et al., 2005; Breiter et. al., 1997). One amongst these areas, the ventral tegmental
area (VTA), is the center of the thoughts’s reward system accountable for the euphoria expert
with romantic love and cocaine, along with the obsessive behaviors that accompany behavior.
15
Activation inside the VTA for passionately in love individuals has been fixed all through cultures,
significantly, in members from the USA (Ortigue et al., 2007), the UK
(Bartels & Zeki, 2000), and China (Xu et al., 2011). In a standard analysis by Olds and Milner
(1954), rats with limitless entry to meals and a lever that provided electrical stimulation to their
VTA pushed the lever repeatedly until collapsing from starvation.
Viewing romantic love as a sort of behavior and requited love as a drug extreme, the
second thought on romantic breakups postulates that going via an undesirable romantic breakup
is a sort of drug withdrawal (Fisher et al., 2010). This addresses the indicators overlapping with
bereavement along with these unaccounted for comparable to mood swings, obsessive conduct, risktaking, and lack of self-control (Dutton & Winstead, 2003; Sbarra & Emery, 2005). Fisher and
colleagues (2010) carried out an fMRI analysis of people who had been currently broken up with and
nonetheless in love with their ex-partner. The outcomes demonstrated train inside the areas of the thoughts that
mediate motivation and reward (i.e., elevated train inside the midbrain area of the VTA and
striatum), as seen in analysis of individuals passionately in love with their companion (e.g., Aron et
al., 2005; Bartels & Zeki, 2000; Ortigue, Bianchi-Demicheli, Hamilton, & Grafton, 2007; Xu et
al., 2011). Extra, rejected-in-love individuals moreover demonstrated train inside the nucleus
accumbens and orbitofrontal/prefrontal cortex, the equivalent areas underlying different drug
addictions comparable to cocaine (Risinger et al., 2005; Volkow et al., 2006). Together with elevated
train inside the VTA, an fMRI analysis of rejected-in-love members found train identical to
individuals withdrawing from stimulant medicine (Fisher et al., 2010). In numerous phrases, whereas rejected
and romantically involved samples confirmed indicators of behavior, the rejected-in-love members
moreover confirmed indicators of withdrawal. As talked about earlier, most likely probably the most pervasive traits
of behavior, obsession, can be one in all many areas of focus contained in the formulation of this analysis.
16
Obsession
Obsessive behaviors present the overwhelming magnitude and power of intrusive,
obsessive concepts which could be frequent after a romantic relationship breakup. Although we may like
to think about that mankind possesses a stage of administration and sophistication previous the obsessive
lever-pushing mice seen by Olds & Milner (1954), we too work together in corresponding
behaviors with further intrusive manifestations. Obsessive behaviors after a breakup differ in
severity and frequency (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Palarea, Cohen, & Rohling, 2000), along with
examples comparable to sending undesirable presents, cellphone calls, textual content material messages, and expressions of
affection (Dutton & Winstead, 2003). In a collegiate sample, 89% of respondents indicated
earlier romantic companion engaged in as a minimum one undesirable pursuit conduct after the
relationship ended (Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al., 2000). Stalking is a further extreme however not
uncommon pursuit conduct after a breakup. In a single analysis, 55% of female and 25% of male
stalking victims indicated that their stalker was an ex-partner from a crucial relationship
(Fremouw et al., 1997) and 21% in a single different analysis mentioned that that they had been the targets of intrusive
contact after they ended a relationship (Haugaard & Seri, 2004). This obsessive conduct moreover
interprets to social networking web pages, comparable to Fb, the place individuals usually
monitor their ex-partner and, on the additional extreme end, use Fb to attempt to reconnect
(Chaulk & Jones, 2011; Marshall, 2012). As an example, in a survey of 1,Zero22 undergraduate
school college students in Canada, 82% of members reported viewing footage that their ex-partner posted
and/or footage of their ex-partner that had been posted by others, 60% study their ex-partner’s
wall conversations (along with posts and replies), and 31% reported using Fb to “preserve
tabs” on their ex-partner. With regard to specific contact, 63% reportedly despatched their ex-partner
messages, 58% posted on their Fb internet web page, and 7% have actually confirmed as a lot as events that
17
their ex-partner indicated by means of Fb that they could be attending. Members moreover used
Fb to stalk and even communicated with their ex-partner’s household and pals (Chaulk &
Jones, 2011). Moreover, those who use Fb to look at ex-romantic companions are further
extra more likely to work together in undesirable bodily pursuit behaviors (Lyndon, Bonds-Raacke, & Cratty,
2011).
Obsessive behaviors are exterior manifestations of a fairly widespread interior experience
after the highest of a romantic relationship: obsessive thought of an ex-relationship (Collins &
Clark, 1989; Self-discipline et al., 2009). As such, understanding the character of obsessive concepts after the
end of a romantic relationship has change right into a extra moderen area of curiosity for dissolution
researchers hoping to know the broader inhabitants or to deal with the additional extreme circumstances
(Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). Inside the extant literature, obsessively critical a few unfavourable
event has moreover been generally known as rumination. Notably, response sorts thought (NolenHoeksema, 1991) defines rumination as a maladaptive response to a unfavourable event, comprised
of obsessive take care of the indicators, causes, and penalties of 1’s distress. The content material materials of
ruminative thought is assumed to be predominantly unfavourable (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008).
Rumination is doubtless some of the usually studied processes of obsessive, repetitive contemplating, and
in depth evaluation demonstrates a significant affiliation between rumination and despair
(see Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema, & Schweizer, 2010, for overview). Particularly, those who ruminate on a
widespread basis often are usually depressed, and the additional that at current depressed individuals
ruminate about their distress, the additional potential they’re to stay which means (Mor & Winquist, 2002).
Furthermore, rumination is linked to myriad unfavourable outcomes, even after controlling for
despair, comparable to hopelessness, low shallowness, dysfunctional attitudes, pessimism, low cost
in social assist, and dependency (Lam, Schuck, Smith, Farmer, & Checkley, 2003; Nolen-
18
Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994; Nolen-Hoeksema, Larson, & Grayson, 1999; Roberts,
Gilboa, & Gotlib, 1998). Self-regulation theories (Carver & Scheier, 1998; Duval & Wicklund,
1972; Martin & Tesser, 1996; Pyszczynski & Greenberg, 1987) contend that rumination outcomes
from perceived discrepancies between one’s current state and their desired state. Moreover,
researchers contend that this obsessive focus could also be adaptive when it ends in draw back fixing or
letting go of unattainable goals, however maladaptive when the individual engages in neither of these
and stays in a state of obsessively specializing of their discrepancies.
As a result of the introduction of response sorts thought, researchers have acknowledged one different
obsessive thought strategy of reflection, or curious and psychological examination of the self and
events, as a assemble distinct from rumination (Trapnell & Campbell, 1999). Although
rumination and reflection are every associated to increased distress inside the short-term, longitudinal
analyses level out that reflection may improve well-being over time (Segerstrom et al., 2003). In
totally different phrases, obsessively critical in regards to the set off and state of 1’s despair is often
maladaptive inside the short- and long-term, whereas obsessive reflection, though painful inside the
quick setting, may be useful for restoration from a hurtful experience inside the long-term.
Although obsessive contemplating is frequent after the highest of a romantic relationship, solely a
few analysis have examined the connection between this obsessive contemplating and breakup-relevant
outcomes. Even with utterly totally different measures of obsessively critical about an ex-relationship (e.g.,
relationship preoccupation, intrusive concepts, rumination), findings are fixed: increased time
spent critical about an ex-partner pertains to elevated ranges of distress, worse adjustment, further
confusion, stress, and despair (Collins & Clark, 1989; Fagundes, 2012; Feeney & Noller,
1992; Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). Inside the nascent analysis inspecting ex-relationship obsession
Collins and Clark (1989) and Davis et al. (2003) found that those who did not end the
19
relationship expert elevated ranges of intrusive concepts and preoccupied critical about their
ex-partner. In a single different analysis of 231 school school college students, relationship preoccupation partially
mediated the connection between attachment sorts and breakup adjustment (Saffrey &
Ehrenberg). Lastly, Fagundes (2012) found an affiliation between relationship reflection and
unfavourable emotional adjustment. In sum, the additional that an individual is often critical about
their ex-partner, the extra extreme off they appear to be in recovering from their breakup. Whereas widespread
time period spent critical about an ex-partner has been linked to pertinent adjustment
outcomes, the content material materials of those thought may current a further nuanced impression. Subsequent, I will talk about
about utterly totally different traits of thought content material materials and their subjective influences inside the fast and
future.
Thought Content material materials Valence
Our concepts and recollections preserve a robust, multifaceted have an effect on on people’s current
psychological state, the place individuals are able to experience an envisioned incident as if it had been
occurring inside the present second (Rasmussen & Bernsten, 2013; Tulving, 2002). Completely totally different
traits have an effect on the subjective power of people’s concepts. As an example, the additional
important an individual is to a person, the additional that individual individual will experience their imagined
presence as occurring inside the present second (Fitzsimons & Bargh, 2003). Grasp et al. (2009)
examined this notion inside the context of romantic relationships. Twenty-five women in long-term
heterosexual relationships participated in a analysis the place ache was induced equally in seven analysis
circumstances. The ache was induced whereas, counting on the current scenario, the participant
each (a) held the hand of the companion, (b) held the hand of a male stranger, (c) held an object, (d)
thought of the companion’s photograph on a computer show, (e) thought of photos of a male
stranger (f) thought of photos of an object (a chair), or (g) thought of a fixation crosshair (no
20
manipulation). Outcomes assist the notion that the imagined presence of an important specific individual
elicits an experience identical to their exact presence. Particularly, members expert
very important attenuation of bodily induced ache when viewing a picture of their romantic
companion equal to the ache decreased whereas holding their companion’s hand, with the partner-photograph
circumstances receiving marginally lower scores. Moreover, outcomes moreover underscored the flexibility of a
beloved one’s assist. Members reported lower ache scores when holding their companion’s hand
than when holding an object or holding a stranger’s hand. Equally, viewing a picture of their
companion led to lower ache scores than when viewing of an object or viewing
photos of a stranger. The equivalent outcomes weren’t present when these circumstances had been
employed with a complete stranger or an object.
This affect could also be seen in concepts and recollections taking place at utterly various factors in
time (Berntsen & Bohn, 2010; D’Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2004; Rasmussen & Bernsten,
2013). Whereas Grasp et al.’s (2009) analysis examined present critical about an ex-partner, a
extremely efficient memory can mission itself onto the present (Tulving, 2002; Wheeler, Stuss, & Tulving,
1997). As an example, Kross et al. (2011) carried out analysis to examine imagined social ache from
the earlier with bodily ache inside the present. Forty members who currently expert an
undesirable romantic relationship end engaged in duties of social rejection and duties of bodily
ache. Notably, to manipulate social rejections, members each “relived” an undesirable
romantic relationship breakup by viewing of their ex-partner whereas critical about
their rejection experience, or thought of of their pal of the equivalent intercourse as their expartner and thought of a optimistic experience they shared with that pal. Bodily ache was
manipulated by members receiving a painful or non-painful thermal stimulation on their left
forearm. Members reported increased distress when reliving their breakup experience in distinction
21
to a optimistic experience with a pal, along with when receiving the painful versus non-painful
thermal stimulation. Moreover, the impression sizes for the social and bodily ache circumstances point out
that the subjective experiences had been equally intense. Furthermore, when critical in regards to the
breakup, thoughts imagining demonstrated increased train within the equivalent areas activated all through firsthand experience of every social exclusion and bodily ache (Eisenberger, 2012).
Although these analysis highlighted utterly totally different factors of concepts which will affect our
current state, as well as they underscore a shared attribute which will significantly have an effect on our current
state: content material materials valence. Definitely, content material materials valence is an integral determinant of the mood elicited by
our concepts. Moreover, content material materials valence surrounding an attitude-object can also have an effect on our
perceptions of the angle object inside the quick second. As an example, in a single analysis (Alea &
Bluck, 2007), 179 adults in long-term relationships had been requested to recall two optimistic
autobiographical recollections from their romantic relationship. With out their companion being present,
merely recalling these two recollections led to an increase in reported optimistic affect and perceived
warmth of their romantic relationship.
The aforementioned analysis underscore the state-based have an effect on of our concepts.
Segerstrom and colleagues (2003) extended this understanding to our widespread state by inspecting
elements of repetitive thought inside the long-term. They acknowledged content material materials valence as a sturdy
dimension of repetitive thought, distinct from the strategy aspect captured by rumination and
reflection. That is, rumination and reflection denote the intention of repetitive contemplating (e.g., to
obtain understanding, to resolve points), whereas content material materials valence pertains to the concepts inside a
ruminative or reflective course of. Optimistic and unfavourable content material materials valence of repetitive concepts is
associated to a corresponding have an effect on on finish consequence variables comparable to affect, physiological
nicely being, and psychological functioning (Kubzansky et al. 1997; Roach, Salt, & Segerstrom, 2010;
22
Segerstrom et al., 2003). That is, optimistic content material materials valence promotes optimistic affect, and improved
physiological nicely being and psychological function whereas unfavourable content material materials valence worsens them.
Whereas there appears to be a personality-linked aspect to the diploma that people take into accounts
positively and negatively valenced concepts, there could also be moreover proof for variability on this space.
Particularly, individuals can significantly shift the amount of positively and negatively valenced
thought that they work together in, and this may be further extra more likely to happen when coping with worrying
circumstances (Roach et al., 2010).
To know the affect of these emotion-laden recollections over time, one line of
evaluation examined the intention of episodic recollections and the best way these recollections influenced
concepts, feelings, and conduct on a day-to-day basis (Bluck, 2003; Pillemer, 2001; Robinson,
1986). Researchers acknowledged three capabilities: social, self, and directive function (Bluck, Alea,
Habermas, & Rubin, 2005). The social function refers again to the strategies by which people work together their
recollections in dialog with others. The self-function refers again to the signifies that people use their
recollections to kind a coherent sense of self over time. The directive function. The directive
function, which denotes how recollections have an effect on concepts, feelings, and conduct (Pillemer,
1998, 2003), is basically probably the most excellent of the three capabilities and most straight related to decisionmaking and romantic relationships (Philippe et al., 2013). The directive function can occur
mechanically with out the individual’s consciousness of its have an effect on (Kuwabara & Pillemer, 2010;
Philippe, Koestner, Beaulieu-Pelletier, Lecours, & Lekes, 2012, Look at 1), and emotional reexperiencing could also be an important aspect to this function (Alea & Bluck, 2007). For
occasion, when deciding whether or not or not or to not eat at a specific restaurant, a person may consider
a optimistic experience that occurred on the restuarant there thus far, and thus be further extra more likely to
decide to eat there.
23
Repetitive unfavourable or optimistic thought content material materials pertaining to a specific event can type
the appraisal or which implies we connect with it (Segerstrom et al., 2003). Philippe and colleagues (2013,
Look at 4) examined the directive function of recollections over time in a one-year longitudinal analysis
of 196 undergraduate and graduate school college students in a romantic relationship. A cross-lag panel analysis
demonstrated that the content material materials of couple-related recollections have an effect on relationship outcomes over
time. The researchers found that the type of memory content material materials at Time 1 predicted relationship
perseverance or dissolution at Time 2. Moreover, they found a reciprocal relationship the place
elevated relationship top quality predicted further satisfying memory recall. In numerous phrases, relational
outcomes predict the couple recollections recalled, whereas couple recollections recalled moreover have an effect on
relational outcomes (Philippe et al., 2013). Whereas totally different researchers inspecting the directive
function with romantic relationship outcomes inside the quick second (Alea & Bluck, 2007;
Bazzini et al., 2007), this analysis launched the importance of this this over time. Moreover,
Philippe and colleagues (2013) conclude that frequent activation of couple-related recollections can
have an effect on how one perceives their current romantic relationship relationship over time. Though
they did not take into consideration this inside the scope of earlier romantic relationships, I posit that that is relevant
to our view of romantic relationships thus far as properly, with important implications for a manner we
reply to breakups.
In essence, Philippe et al. (2013) implied that by recalling emotion-laden recollections,
people might unintentionally reappraise a romantic relationship over time. Although valence has
been omitted from earlier evaluation with breakups, optimistic or unfavourable valence repeatedly
utilized to a earlier romantic relationship might significantly differ the course of restoration.
From a self-regulation theorist perspective, as obsessive contemplating and distress finish consequence from the
discrepancy between one’s current state and their desired state, negatively reappraising the ex-
24
relationship to look a lot much less fascinating could possibly be adaptive; wanting the companion a lot much less would further
intently match the current state of not being with the ex-partner. In numerous phrases, if a person alters
their view of their objective to undesirable, the discrepancy could possibly be diminished, along with the
amount of obsessive contemplating and presenting distress. Nonetheless, sustaining or rising the
perceived desirability in direction of an unattainable state will solely perseverate and/or exacerbate this
distress. In terms of a earlier romantic relationship, if an individual reappraises their exrelationship as a lot much less and fewer fascinating, then their current state (i.e., not inside the relationship) will
match their desired state, and they are going to switch in direction of acceptance. Conversely, if an individual
continues to evaluate their ex-relationship in a optimistic light, they will solely wrestle to easily settle for the
breakup, sustaining the distress and obsession accompanying this dissonance. Furthermore,
recalling low-closure recollections elicits further intense emotion than high-closure recollections, and
critical a few low-closure memory incites an urge to repeat a job with a objective to acquire a
thwarted objective (Beike & Wirth-Beaumont, 2005; Beike, Adams, & Wirth-Beaumont, 2007).
Thus, if the actual individual would not have closure on their relationship and thus being of their exrelationship is their “objective”, then recalling recollections, notably individuals who reinforce the aim
itself, will perpetuate that need.
Previous analysis inspecting the magnitude of relationship preoccupation, little effort has
been made to delineate mannequin or content material materials of the concepts themselves. That is, researchers have
hardly examined if there are differential outcomes related to the best way wherein that we take into accounts an exrelationship after a breakup. Whereas Saffrey and Ehrenberg (2007) examined relationship
preoccupation, as well as they examined members’ widespread tendencies (i.e., not inside the context of
their romantic breakup) to ruminate and mirror after experiencing a unfavourable event. Outcomes
indicated that brooding (rumination) was uniquely linked to worse adjustment and reflection was
25
uniquely linked to increased adjustment. As talked about earlier, Fagundes (2012) did examine
reflection inside the context of romantic relationships, and outcomes demonstrated that reflection was
not adaptive inside the short-term; nonetheless, the analysis did not embody the other subscale measure for
rumination, which is often measured concurrently. Each means, these analysis clarify the
potential for traits of obsessive thought previous the sheer magnitude to have an effect on
adjustment outcomes. Content material materials valence of these ex-relationship concepts has moreover been
missed.
One analysis (Lewandowski, 2009) did assess valence as a manipulation of adjustment
amongst individuals who expert a romantic relationship breakup thus far six months. After
filling out a pre-test survey that measured optimistic and unfavourable emotions expert as a result of the
breakup, members (n=87) wrote for 20 minutes about each optimistic or unfavourable concepts
regarding the aftermath of their breakup as quickly as per day for three days. Curiously, findings had been
blended. In keeping with the current dialogue, members inside the optimistic scenario reported
experiencing further optimistic emotion as a result of the breakup compared with these inside the unfavourable
scenario. However no variations in unfavourable emotion had been reported between circumstances. The
researchers then examined these outcomes controlling for initiator standing. As quickly as managed for, there
was no distinction in optimistic emotion between circumstances till the breakup was mutual. These
inside the neutral and unfavourable circumstances solely elevated in optimistic emotion if the participant
initiated the breakup. Nonetheless, there have been quite a few limitations that preclude its software program to the
current analysis. As an example, members returned for a post-test survey and debriefing two days
after they achieved the third writing train. Subsequently, any quick outcomes may have been
overcome by any another way valenced concepts that the individual may have been partaking in
independently as a result of the remaining writing train. Furthermore, the analysis primarily checked out optimistic
26
and unfavourable valence surrounding the breakup versus the connection itself. The
instructions modified day by day, nevertheless the instructed valence was fixed. After writing regarding the
relationship that ended (Day 1), members inside the non-neutral circumstances had been instructed to “let
go and write about your deepest concepts and (optimistic/ unfavourable) feelings about aftermath of the
breakup” each “just some days after it occurred” (Day 2; Lewandowski, 2009, p.25) or “just some
weeks after it occurred” (Day Three; Lewandowski, 2009, p.25). An extra potential draw back
proper right here is that, in critical in regards to the aftermath of the breakup, people may have generated concepts
exterior of the connection. As an example, a person may highlight the assistance they acquired from
associates. Although they may actually really feel nearer to their associates, this may occasionally more and more or couldn’t make an individual
actually really feel increased regarding the relationship ending itself.
In numerous phrases, whereas this analysis is the first to include thought content material materials valence in a
romantic relationship analysis, the methodology differentiates the analysis from the one which’s
at current being proposed. The members did not reply to the consequence measures immediately
after the intervention was achieved. The valence was primarily utilized to the breakup and by no means the
relationship itself. Moreover, the content material materials did not primarily include the exact romantic
relationship that ended. Although the aforementioned causes prohibit the conclusions which may be
drawn from these findings, the utterly totally different outcomes when controlling for initiator standing does
underscore the place it should presumably play in analysis of this nature. This analysis contributes to the literature on
relationship concepts and breakups by considering choices of concepts neutral from the
presence of obsessive concepts in a single’s life after a breakup (i.e., optimistic and unfavourable valence),
and demonstrating the potential have an effect on of initiator standing inside the breakup. Nonetheless, their
methods technique the notion of valence in a a lot much less related model to the analysis being proposed.
27
Quite a lot of present analysis have provided proof that valence points. A present scale
enchancment analysis demonstrated that an individual’s concepts after a relationship breakup might
comprise every optimistic and unfavourable content material materials. Brenner and Vogel (2015) developed the Optimistic and
Damaging Ex-Relationship Thought (PANERT) scale to measure positively and negatively
valenced ex-relationship concepts. The positively and negatively valenced devices loaded as two
distinct parts coinciding with positively valenced and negatively valenced thought content material materials.
Every constructs had been uniquely associated to increased unfavourable emotional adjustment, breakup
distress, and lack of self-concept. Extra, that they had been associated to totally different constructs in reverse
directions. Further frequent optimistic concepts regarding the ex-partner and/or ex-relationship was
uniquely associated increased ranges of despair, lower rediscovery of self-concept, and reduce
optimistic adjustment. Conversely, unfavourable concepts regarding the ex-partner uniquely predicted
increased rediscovery of self-concept, further optimistic adjustment, and had no statistically very important
affiliation with despair. In numerous phrases, every optimistic valence account for distinctive variance in
outcomes pertinent to romantic relationship breakups and likewise present distinctive patterns inside the
signifies that they relate to these outcomes.
This notion of two distinct sorts of thought content material materials can be supported by evaluation with
rejected-in-love individuals who had been requested to think about their beloved ex-partner with no
specific instruction on thought content material materials valence (Fisher et al., 2010). Fisher et al.’s (2010) report
of what members thought of by the fMRI scan portrayed the fluctuation in content material materials
valence inside members critical about their ex-partner:
“Via the prescanning interview, the interviewer (HEF) and participant talked about
events that the participant might take into accounts whereas looking at each photograph…the
members started with their feelings of disappointment and their itemizing of injustices…[but]
expressed every unfavourable and optimistic feelings…Inside the postscanning interview, individuals
confirmed blended expressions of romantic love, agitation, anger, and despair. Most
recounted every utterly happy and unhappy recollections.” (p. 53, Fisher et al., 2010)
28
Curiously, these differing thought contents may have led to utterly totally different activations of the
thoughts. Fischer et al. (2010) carried out fMRI scans of these individuals whereas that they had been contemplating
about their ex (i.e., every utterly happy and unhappy recollections). In numerous phrases, the rejected-in-love
members confirmed indicators of every experiencing drug highs and withdrawal. Nonetheless, as well-known
above, on this analysis members the place given no instructions as what factors of the connection to
take into accounts and acknowledged every optimistic and unfavourable factors to remember. In a single different fMRI
analysis of romantic relationship breakups (Najib et al., 2004), rejected-in-love members had been
significantly instructed to elucidate a “sad thought of their lover on which that that they had been
ruminating” (p. 2246). On this analysis members did not current activation inside the reward strategies
thoughts space, and even confirmed deactivation in positive areas activated inside the Fisher et al. (2010)
analysis. Although researchers have speculated why this discrepancy occurred, they have not found
a conclusive clarification. I posit that this distinction lies inside the content material materials of their concepts and,
in distinction to earlier analysis on content material materials valence, that optimistic thought content material materials is certainly maladaptive
to breakup restoration. If critical about an important specific individual elicits an experience identical to
their bodily presence, and if breakups really are a sort of behavior, then a positively valenced
thought or memory might induce the non everlasting however extremely efficient feeling of experiencing an expartner’s affection. This may moreover make clear why members, who oscillated from utterly happy to
unhappy memory recollection in Fisher and colleagues’ analysis, confirmed indicators of drug extreme as properly
as craving whereas members in Najib and colleagues’ (2004) analysis, who thought of their
grief, did not current indicators of behavior or craving. If an individual experiences “withdrawal” from
their ex-partner’s love, utilizing optimistic recollections may provide help however moreover perform
unintentional reappraisal of the ex-partner.
29
The Current Look at
Although earlier evaluation demonstrated that people obsessively take into accounts factors of
their ex-relationship after a breakup, researchers have infrequently thought-about the choices of these
concepts—what they provide thought to their ex-relationship, how they provide thought to their exrelationship—as an area that can lead to various paces of restoration from a romantic breakup.
Ponder thought content material materials valence, for example. If two individuals, every terribly and equally
devastated over their romantic relationship breakup, obsessively take into accounts their ex-relationship
nevertheless one predominately thinks about what they love and miss from their ex-relationship and the
totally different thinks about all the annoying factors of the connection, would they get nicely on the
related charge? That question cannot be answered because of, earlier to this analysis, it has not however been
requested. By considering potential variations in outcomes related to how individuals take into accounts
an ex-relationship, this line of research might inform the occasion of interventions aimed towards
serving to individuals experiencing a distressing romantic breakup. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to
examine how the valence of recollections specific to an ex-relationship may differentially affect
quick scores of affect and outcomes related to shifting on.
The current experimental analysis featured a 2 (Valence: Optimistic versus Damaging) x 2
(Relationship type: Ex-relationship versus Friendship) between-subjects design. Members
engaged in a writing train the place, counting on the scenario, that they had been instructed to place in writing
about each optimistic or unfavourable recollections about their most recent ex-relationship or a gift
friendship. Members then responded to measures related to affect, self-concept, and breakup
adjustment. The friendship scenario was included with a objective to parse out whether or not or not any seen
patterns could possibly be the attributable to valence outcomes mainly or attributable to valence outcomes contained in the
specific context of ex-relationship recollections.
30
Reminding oneself of the optimistic factors of a relationship may make it more durable to
switch on from the connection, whereas reminding oneself of the unfavourable factors of a
relationship may be reassuring in direction of the reality that the connection is over. Nonetheless, the
have an effect on of valence with friendship-related concepts might very nicely have the opposite affect on
breakup-related outcomes anticipated with these about ex-relationship. Supportive friendships can
positively have an effect on psychological nicely being and shallowness (Keefe & Berndt, 2006), and social assistance is
important in coping with troublesome life events (Shin & Ryan, 2012) along with romantic
relationship breakups (Locker, McIntosh, Hackney, Wilson & Wiegand, 2010). As our concepts
can affect our current second experience, positively valenced recollections of a friendship might
reinforce this social assist and make one actually really feel a lot much less alone. Conversely, critical about unfavourable
recollections from a friendship could lead on one to essentially really feel further isolated. Subsequently, a person who thinks
about positively valenced friendship recollections would potential experience this as useful
compared with any individual who thinks about negatively valenced friendship recollections.
As talked about beforehand, valence of thought is often linked to congruent affect.
Subsequently, one would anticipate that affect-congruence is present all through relationship kinds.
Nonetheless, an exception to this may be present for ex-relationships because the connection is over and
thus optimistic recollections could lead on on one to stay hooked as much as one factor they can’t have ensuing
in a decreased functionality to maneuver on and elevated distress. If valenced concepts about an exrelationship do have an effect on breakup-related outcomes in reverse directions as anticipated, this might
current clear proof that contained in the context of romantic relationships which have ended, optimistic
valenced concepts are further detrimental and fewer useful to psychological nicely being and well-being than
negatively valenced concepts.
31
Evaluation Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1: Adaptive Outcomes
A two-way interaction of valence (optimistic versus unfavourable) and relationship type (exrelationship versus friendship) was predicted with regard to outcomes related to shifting on.
Notably, amongst members who wrote about an ex-relationship, negatively valenced writing
was predicted yield elevated scores rediscovery of self-concept and optimistic adjustment amongst
members inside the ex-relationship scenario, nevertheless yield lower scores on these variables amongst
members inside the friendship scenario.
Hypothesis 2: Hostile Outcomes
A two-way interaction of valence (optimistic versus unfavourable) and relationship type (exrelationship versus friendship) was predicted with regard to adversarial outcomes. Negatively
valenced writing was predicted yield elevated scores lack of self-concept and unfavourable adjustment
amongst members inside the ex-relationship scenario, nevertheless yield lower scores on these variables
amongst members inside the friendship scenario.
Hypothesis Three: Affect Congruence
A vital impression was predicted with respect to affect such that members inside the negatively
valenced writing circumstances had been anticipated to report increased unfavourable affect and reduce optimistic
affect.
32
CHAPTER Three
METHODS
Power Analysis
No earlier analysis has examined how writing about differential thought content material materials valence
about an ex-relationship may have an effect on relationship adjustment for individuals who’ve
expert a romantic relationship breakup. An affect analysis was carried out for small,
medium, and large impression sizes. Assuming a small impression (.2 to .Three) and an affect of .eight, this analysis
would require a sample of 90 to 199 members. Assuming a medium impression (.5) measurement and a
power of .eight, this analysis would require a sample of 34 members. Assuming a huge impact measurement
(.eight), this analysis would require a sample measurement of 15 members (Faul, Erdfelder, Land, & Buchner,
2007). To be further conservative, the aim for this analysis was to recruit as a minimum 200 members.
Members
Undergraduate school college students from Iowa State School had been recruited via an online based mostly
evaluation sign-up system (SONA) administered by the Division of Psychology. The evaluation
pool had been school college students at current enrolled in introductory psychology and communication analysis
packages who can be a part of analysis as one selection of gaining credit score rating in direction of their course evaluation
requirement. Those who have had a romantic relationship end thus far twelve months had been
eligible to participate. Following the outcomes of an affect analysis, the aim was to recruit as a minimum
200 members for this analysis. A small impression measurement (.2) was used inside the power analysis as a
conservative estimate because of no analysis has examined how writing about differential thought
content material materials valence about an ex-relationship may have an effect on relationship adjustment for individuals
who’ve expert a romantic relationship breakup.
33
A whole of 242 undergraduate school college students participated inside the analysis. Members who did not
write regarding the proper experience all by all of the writing practice in line with our
manipulation take a look at had been far from further analyses (n = 17). Subsequently, 225 members
had been included inside the remaining analyses (MAge = 19.Zero; SD = 1.7). Lots of the members had been
female (66.4%), European American (82.6%; Asian American [7.6%], African American [3.6%],
Multiracial American [2.7%], Latino/Latina American [2.7%], and American Indian/Alaskan
Native [0.4%]), heterosexual (95.1%; bisexual [2.7%], gay [0.9%], questioning [0.4%],
pansexual [0.4%]) and at current single (68.9%). The standard dimension of time since their most
present breakup was 6.Zero months (SD = Three.9).
Look at Design
Members (N =225) had been randomly assigned to a 2 (Relationship: ex-relationship vs.
friendship) x 2 (Valence: optimistic vs. unfavourable) between subjects experimental designed. All
members engaged in a writing train the place they described a memory from a relationship.
Members inside the ex-partner scenario (n = 122) described a memory involving an ex-romantic
companion. Members inside the friendship circumstances (n = 103) described a memory involving a
pal. Members inside the optimistic valance scenario (n = 110) had been instructed to place in writing a couple of
optimistic memory whereas members inside the unfavourable valence circumstances (n = 115) had been
instructed to place in writing a couple of unfavourable memory.
Measures
Members responded to background questions on their ex-relationship along with
measures of current affect (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), self-concept readability
(Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007), and adjustment to the breakup (Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007)
34
using self-report measures. Data on each of these measures is provided below, and all
experimental measures are included in Appendix A.
Self-Thought
The rediscovery of self scale (ROSS) and the Lack of Self Scale (LOSS; Lewandowski &
Bizzoco, 2007) had been used to measure optimistic and unfavourable self-concept adjustment after a
romantic relationship breakup. The Rediscovery of Self Scale (ROSS; Lewandowski & Bizzoco,
2007) is a 6-item scale that measures the diploma to which members felt that that they had develop into
reacquainted with factors of the self since their romantic breakup. Members charge how properly
each merchandise describes them since their romantic relationship ended using a 7-point Likert scale
ranging from 1 (under no circumstances) to 7 (an unbelievable deal) with elevated scores indicating increased rediscovery of
self. A sample devices is “‘I’ve reclaimed misplaced parts of myself that I could not particular whereas
with my companion.” The ROSS has been positively associated to increased acceptance, optimistic
emotions, and inversely associated to denial (Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007). It has moreover
been associated to increased negatively valenced concepts about an ex-relationship and reduce
positively valenced concepts about an ex-relationship (Brenner & Vogel, 2015). Internal
consistency has been demonstrated in earlier analysis, ranging from .88 (Brenner & Vogel,
2015) to .91 (Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007). Inside the current analysis, the ROSS yielded an interior
consistency of .90.
The LOSS is a 6-item scale that measures the extent to which one has expert selfconcept loss after the highest of a romantic relationship. Members use 7-point Likert scale
ranging from 1 (under no circumstances) to 7 (an unbelievable deal) to charge how properly each merchandise describes them since
their breakup, with elevated scores indicating the next lack of self-concept. A sample devices is “I
don’t know who I am.” The LOSS has been positively associated optimistic ex-relationship
35
concepts, unfavourable ex-relationship concepts (Brenner & Vogel, 2015), unfavourable emotions, denial,
and psychological disengagement (Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007). Internal consistency has been
demonstrated in earlier analysis, ranging from .90, (Lewandowski & Bizzoco, 2007) to .94
(Brenner & Vogel, 2015). Inside the current analysis, the LOSS yielded an interior consistency of .87.
Optimistic and Damaging Relationship Adjustment
The connection adjustment measure (Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007) was used to judge
post-dissolution adjustment. The 18-item measure consists of optimistic adjustment and unfavourable
adjustment subscales. Members charge the extent to which they experience specific emotions
when at current critical about their misplaced companion and relationship on a 7-point Likert scale from 1
(under no circumstances) to 7 (very loads). Examples of issues assessing optimistic adjustment embody “utterly happy,”
“glad,” and “relieved. “Examples of unfavourable adjustment embody “hurt”, “dissatisfied”, and
“lonely”. The size was tailor-made from an earlier analysis (Sprecher, 1994) whereby the directions
had been altered to inquire regarding the members’ current feelings when critical in regards to the breakup,
versus how they felt initially after the breakup. Extra, the distinctive mannequin of this
measure, Sprecher (1994) used 9 devices to grab unfavourable adjustment and 5 devices to
seize optimistic adjustment after a breakup. Saffrey and Ehrenberg (2007) included four further
optimistic adjustment devices, which they took from Sanna & Turley-Ames’ (2000) analysis of
counterfactual contemplating (i.e., “if solely” psychological simulations of different outcomes). Responses
for each subscale are averaged to calculate their respective scores, with elevated scores indicating
increased optimistic adjustment or increased unfavourable adjustment congruent with the respective
dimension of adjustment. Assemble validity has been provided for every subscales. The optimistic
adjustment subscale has been associated to a lot much less relationship preoccupation, increased ranges of
reflection, and better ranges of widespread optimistic adjustment (Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). The
36
unfavourable adjustment subscale has been associated to increased relationship preoccupation, lower
ranges of reflection, lower ranges of widespread optimistic adjustment (Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007),
increased optimistic ex-relationship concepts and unfavourable ex-relationship concepts (Brenner &
Vogel, 2015). Every the optimistic adjustment and unfavourable adjustment subscales have
demonstrated good interior consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas of .93 and .88, respectively
(Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). In a present analysis of undergraduate school college students, the optimistic
adjustment subscale demonstrated an interior consistency of .85 and the unfavourable adjustment
subscale demonstrated an interior consistency of .88 (Brenner & Vogel, 2015). The current analysis
demonstrated interior consistencies of .93 and .89 for optimistic adjustment and unfavourable
adjustment, respectively.
Affect
The optimistic and unfavourable affect scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) was
used to judge state affect of members immediately after writing about their ex-relationship.
The 20-item scale consists of every optimistic affect (PANAS PA) devices, comparable to “excited” and
“sturdy” and unfavourable affect (PANAS NA) devices comparable to “distressed, “upset,” and “accountable”
(Watson et al., 1988, p. 1070). Elevated scores level out further affect on that dimension of current
affect. Earlier analysis demonstrated the validity of the PANAS via its associations to state
and totally different measures of optimistic and unfavourable mood (Watson et al., 1998). Cronbach’s alpha
scores in undergraduate samples for optimistic mood have ranged from .86 to .90, and for unfavourable
mood have ranged from .84 to .87 (Watson et al., 1988). In a present analysis of undergraduate
school college students at a Midwestern school, the Cronbach’s alpha ranking for optimistic mood was .86, and
for unfavourable mood was .78 (Lannin, Guyll, Vogel, & Madon, 2013). Internal reliabilities for the
PANAS PA and PANAS NA inside the current analysis had been .88 and .85, respectively.
37
Background Questions About The Breakup
Members responded to 2 background questions regarding the relationship breakup: “how
manner again did the connection end?” and “who ended the connection? (l = me to 7 = my
companion)”.
Experimental Manipulation of Valence and Relationship Form
Members had been randomly assigned to one amongst four ten-minute writing exercises designed
to elicit each reminiscing about positively or negatively valenced recollections from each their
ex-relationship or from a friendship. Instructions for each writing scenario (see Appendix C)
had been tailor-made from Lepore and Greenberg (2002). Inside the optimistic ex-relationship scenario,
members had been instructed to recall and write a couple of optimistic memory from and/or optimistic
factors of their most recent romantic relationship. Inside the unfavourable ex-relationship scenario,
members had been instructed to recall and write a couple of unfavourable memory from and/or unfavourable
factors of their most recent romantic relationship. Inside the optimistic friendship scenario,
members had been instructed to recall and write a couple of optimistic memory from and/or optimistic
factors of a friendship that is important to them. Inside the unfavourable friendship scenario, members
had been instructed to recall and write a couple of unfavourable memory from and/or unfavourable factors of a
friendship that is important to them.
Manipulation Confirm
Written responses had been first examined to confirm that members adopted directions for
the respective manipulated scenario. An undergraduate evaluation assistant who was blind to the
assigned circumstances study each response and rated which scenario they thought the participant
was assigned to see whether or not or not this matched their exact assigned scenario. The evaluation assistant
moreover examined whether or not or not the participant adopted the directions for his or her full response.
38
Members who did not write regarding the proper experience via all of the writing practice
had been far from further analyses.
Course of
IRB approval was obtained earlier to the commencement of this analysis (see Appendix B).
Members signed up for the analysis on-line via SONA on a first-come, first-serve basis. The
analysis posting on SONA indicated that the analysis examined the thought content material materials for a lot of who
have expert a present romantic relationship breakup. Upon arriving to the laboratory,
members study and signed an educated consent doc that communicated the procedures in
place to maintain up anonymity of participant responses. Subsequently, members responded to
background questions regarding the relationship breakup.
Members had been randomly assigned to one in all many four ten-minute writing exercises (i.e.,
optimistic ex-relationship, unfavourable ex-relationship, optimistic friendship, or unfavourable friendship).
After this experimental manipulation of thought content material materials valence and relationship type,
members achieved the PANAS to measure optimistic and unfavourable affect, the LOSS to measure
perceived lack of self-concept as a result of the breakup, the ROSS to measure rediscovery of selfconcept as a result of the breakup, the connection adjustment measure to measure optimistic and unfavourable
adjustment to the breakup, and demographic devices (e.g., age, gender). On the conclusion of the
analysis, members had been debriefed, requested to maintain up confidentiality regarding the character of the
analysis, and dismissed.
39
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS
Manipulation Confirm
Seventeen members did not write regarding the proper experience via all of the
writing practice and had been far from further analyses. A whole of 225 members had been
included inside the remaining analyses.
Important Analyses
To take a look at the proposed hypotheses, which include differential outcomes of valence inside
utterly totally different relationship kinds on adaptive outcomes, adversarial outcomes, and affect, a group of
MANCOVA and ANCOVA analyses had been carried out using the equivalent model with all dependent
variables. Particularly, neutral variables had been valence (optimistic versus unfavourable) and
relationship type (ex-relationship versus friendship), and their interaction time interval. Covariates had been
initiator standing and time as a result of the connection ended. I moreover examined the inclusion of potential
interaction phrases—significantly, interactions between the covariates and each scenario—to
resolve in the event that they should be included inside the remaining model. Outcomes did not suggest that the inclusion
of any further very important interaction phrases added significantly to the model (ps > .05). As
such, the distinctive model was used for subsequent analyses. A set of linear regression analyses
had been moreover carried out to take a look at for factors with collinearity and for circumstances of influential info
components. Outcomes did not present any factors with collinearity or influential info components.
Descriptive information for each scenario and dependent variable are provided in Desk 1.
40
Desk 1
Descriptive Statistics of All Finish consequence Measures by Experimental Manipulation of Valence and
Relationship Form
n Time ROSS Optimistic
Adjustment
LOSS Damaging
Adjustment
Optimistic
Affect
Damaging
Affect
Optimistic
Ex-Relationship 57 Three.12
(1.81)
Three.61
(1.56)
Three.70
(1.46)
1.94
(1.21)
Three.22
(1.29)
2.61
(Zero.82)
1.69
(Zero.61)
Damaging ExRelationship 53 Three.30
(2.00)
4.43
(1.51)
4.12
(1.44)
2.02
(1.24)
Three.31
(1.40)
Three.16
(Zero.63)
1.43
(Zero.43)
Optimistic
Friendship 65 Three.55
(1.83)
4.41
(1.50)
Three.76
(1.63)
2.03
(1.15)
Three.44
(1.43)
2.64
(Zero.93)
1.92
(Zero.72)
Damaging
Friendship 50 Three.26
(1.76)
Three.75
(1.74)
Three.49
(1.59)
2.30
(1.45)
Three.51
(1.51)
2.64
(Zero.78)
1.86
(Zero.70)
Discover: Means are launched with regular deviations in parentheses.
Hypothesis 1: Adaptive Outcomes
An interaction between valence and relationship type was hypothesized. Notably, it
was predicted that these inside the ex-relationship scenario would level out lower scores of
rediscovery of self-concept and optimistic adjustment within the occasion that they wrote about positively valenced
recollections, whereas these inside the friendship scenario would level out lower scores within the occasion that they wrote
about negatively valenced recollections. First, a MANCOVA was carried out with rediscovery of
self-concept and optimistic adjustment as a result of the dependent variables. No vital outcomes had been found for
valence, F (2, 219) = 1.437, p = .240, η2= .001, or relationship type, F (2, 219) = Zero.145, p =
.865, η2= .01. Nonetheless, per hypotheses, a significant interaction impression between
valence and relationship circumstances was present, F (1, 219) = 4.96, p < .05, η2= .02.
To further examine the affect of relationship of valence and relationship type on each of
the outcomes, separate ANCOVA analyses had been carried out for each dependent variable (see
Desk 2 and Desk Three). As demonstrated in Desk 2, there have been no vital outcomes for rediscovery of
self-concept for valence, F (1, 219) = Zero.297, p = .586, η2 = .001 or relationship type, F (1, 219) =
41
Zero.Zero97, p = .756, η2 = .000. As demonstrated in Desk Three, there have been moreover no vital outcomes for
valence, F (1, 219) = 1.525, p = .596, η2 = .Zero07, or relationship type, F (1, 219) = Zero.218, p =
.596, η2 = .001, on optimistic adjustment.
Desk 2
ANCOVA of Model Predicting ROSS
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 16.23 16.23 6.79*
Measurement 1 6.48 6.48 2.71
Valence 1 Zero.71 Zero.71 Zero.30
Relationship 1 Zero.23 Zero.23 Zero.10
Valence * Relationship 1 15.52 15.52 15.52***
Corrected Model 5 54.64 10.93
4.57** Error 219 523.86 2.39
Corrected Full 224 578.50
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Desk Three
ANCOVA of Model Predicting Optimistic Adjustment
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 72.26 72.26 35.92***
Measurement 1 6.51 6.51 Three.23
Valence 1 Three.10 Three.10 1.19
Relationship 1 Zero.57 Zero.57 Zero.26
Valence * Relationship 1 10.00 10.00 5.Zero*
Corrected Model 5 90.75 18.15
9.00*** Error 219 441.84 2.02
Corrected Full 224 532.59
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Confirming the hypothesis, ANCOVA analyses did level out very important interaction ends in
predicting rediscovery of self-concept, F (1, 219) = 15.52, p < .001, η2 = .07, and optimistic
adjustment, F (1, 219) = 4.96, p < .05, η2 = .02 such that there have been variations between optimistic
and unfavourable valence for each relationship type, nevertheless in reverse directions (see Desk 4). That is,
contained in the ex-relationship circumstances, those who wrote about unfavourable recollections reported increased
42
rediscovery of self (Madj = 4.49) than those who wrote about optimistic recollections (Madj = Three.55).
Conversely, contained in the friendship circumstances, rediscovery of self-concept scores had been lower for
those who wrote about unfavourable recollections (Madj = Three.72) than those who wrote about optimistic
recollections (Madj = 4.44). Partial eta-squared (η2
), used as a measurement of impression measurement, examines
the ratio of variance inside the dependent variable accounted for by the chosen neutral variable
when controlling for various variables. The partial eta-squared of the interaction time interval in predicting
rediscovery of self indicated a medium to massive impression measurement (η2 = .07; Cohen, 1988).
Pairwise comparisons revealed that members inside the unfavourable ex-relationship scenario
indicated significantly elevated rediscovery of self-ratings compared with these inside the optimistic exfriendship scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.94, p < .01, 95% CI [.38, 1.50]) and unfavourable friendship
scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.76, p < .05, 95% CI [0.18, 1.34]). There have been moreover elevated scores of
rediscovery of self inside the optimistic friendship scenario in distinction with the unfavourable friendship
scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.71, p < .05, 95% CI [0.11, 1.32]) and the optimistic ex-relationship scenario
(ΔMadj = Zero.89, p < .01, 95% CI [-1.48, -.31]).
Optimistic adjustment was moreover greater for the unfavourable ex-relationship scenario (Madj =
Three.78) than the optimistic ex-relationship scenario (Madj = Three.59), whereas contained in the friendship
circumstances, scores of optimistic adjustment had been highest for the optimistic valence scenario (Madj =
4.12) and lowest for unfavourable valence scenario (Madj = Three.46). The impression measurement of this interaction
(η2 = .02) signifies that this generally is a small however vital interaction. Pairwise comparisons revealed
that members inside the optimistic friendship scenario indicated significantly elevated optimistic
adjustment than these the unfavourable friendship scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.66, p < .05, 95% CI [0.1,
1.22]) and marginally significantly elevated scores than members the optimistic romantic
scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.53, p = .Zero53, 95% CI [-0.01, 1.07]). Complete, the outcomes of the ANCOVA
43
checks supported the hypothesis of an interaction between valence and relationship type such that
optimistic valence was further adaptive inside the friendship scenario solely.
Desk 4
Adjusted Means and Simple Foremost Outcomes for ROSS and Optimistic Adjustment
Rediscovery of Self
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship Three.55 (.21) 4.49 (.19) 4.02 (.14) -Zero.94 (.29)**
Friendship 4.44 (.21) Three.27 (.22) 4.08 (.15) Zero.71 (.31)*
M (SE) Three.99 (.15) 4.11 (.15) 4.05 (.10) -Zero.11 (.21)
∆M (SE) -Zero.89 (.30) Zero.76 (.29)* -Zero.07 (.21)
Optimistic Adjustment
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship Three.59 (.19) Three.78 (.18) Three.69 (.13) -Zero.19 (.26)
Friendship 4.12 (.20) Three.46 (.20) Three.79 (.14) Zero.67 (.28)*
M (SE) Three.86 (.14) Three.62 (.14) Three.74 (.01) Zero.24 (.19)
∆M (SE) -Zero.53 (.27) Zero.33 (.27) -.10 (.19)
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Decide 1 and Decide 2. Estimated marginal indicate rediscovery of self and optimistic adjustment,
respectively, by experimental manipulation of valence and relationship type.
Three
Three.5
4
4.5
5
Optimistic Damaging
ROSS
Valence
Ex-Relationship Friendship
Three
Three.5
4
4.5
5
Optimistic Damaging
Optimistic Adjustment
Valence
Ex-Relationship Friendship
44
Hypothesis 2: Hostile Outcomes
It was hypothesized that self-ratings of lack of self-concept and unfavourable adjustment
could possibly be highest for a lot of who wrote about optimistic ex-relationship recollections and unfavourable
friendship recollections and lowest for a lot of who wrote about unfavourable ex-relationship recollections
and optimistic friendship recollections. A MANCOVA was carried out to take a look at this hypothesized
interaction impression. No vital outcomes had been found for valence F (2, 219) = .407, p = .666, η2 = .00 or
relationship type, F (2, 219) = Zero.757, p = .470, η2 = .01. Outcomes did not level out a significant
interaction impression between valence and relationship type F (1, 219) = 1.11, p = .332, η2 = .01. To
examine each dependent variable individually, two-way ANCOVAs had been carried out individually for
every lack of self-concept (see Desk 5) and for unfavourable adjustment (see Desk 6). As
demonstrated in Desk 5 and Desk 6, analyses did not level out a significant interaction impression for
loss self-concept, F (1, 219) = 2.15, p = .144, η2 = .01, or unfavourable adjustment F (1, 219) = Zero.97,
p = .326, η2 = .00, respectively. Complete, the outcomes did not assist this hypothesis that selfratings of lack of self-concept and unfavourable adjustment could possibly be highest for a lot of who wrote
about unfavourable friendship recollections and lowest for a lot of who wrote about unfavourable exrelationship recollections. Estimated marginal means, vital outcomes, and straightforward vital outcomes are
reported in Desk 7. Decide 4 and Decide 5 provide seen representations of the estimated marginal
means.
45
Desk 5.
ANCOVA of Model Predicting LOSS
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 eight.78 eight.78 6.26*
Measurement 1 33.91 33.91 24.17***
Valence 1 Zero.57 Zero.57 .29
Relationship 1 2.08 2.08 1.48
Valence * Relationship 1 Three.02 Three.02 2.15
Corrected Model 5 47.20 9.44
6.73*** Error 219 175.58 2.39
Corrected Full 224 354.48
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Desk 6
ANCOVA of Model Predicting Damaging Adjustment
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 33.13 33.13 7.18***
Measurement 1 24.00 24.00 19.09***
Valence 1 1.34 1.34 Zero.67
Relationship 1 1.11 1.11 Zero.66
Valence * Relationship 1 1.68 1.68 Zero.97
Corrected Model 5 62.28 12.46
7.18*** Error 219 380.10 1.74
Corrected Full 224 442.37
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Decide Three and Decide 4. Estimated marginal indicate lack of self and unfavourable adjustment,
respectively, by experimental manipulation of valence and relationship type.
1
1.5
2
2.5
Three
Optimistic Damaging
LOSS
Valence
Ex-Relationship Friendship
2
2.5
Three
Three.5
4
Optimistic Damaging
Damaging Adjustment
Valence
Ex-Relationship Friendship
46
Desk 7.
Estimated Marginal Means, Foremost Outcomes and Simple Foremost Outcomes for LOSS and Damaging
Adjustment
Lack of Self
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship 2.05 (.16) 1.91 (.15) 1.98 (.11) Zero.13 (.22)
Friendship 2.01 (.216) 2.31 (.17) 2.17 (.12) -Zero.34 (.23)
M (SE) 2.03 (.11)) 2.13 (.11) 2.08 (.08) -Zero.10 (.16)
∆M (SE) Zero.43 (.23) -Zero.43 (.23) -Zero.19 (.16)
Damaging Adjustment
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship Three.34 (.18) Three.32 (.17) Three.33 (.12) Zero.02 (.24)
Friendship Three.30 (.18) Three.63 (.29) Three.47 (.13) -Zero.32 (.26)
M (SE) Three.32 (.13) Three.48 (.12) Three.40 (.01) -Zero.16 (.18)
∆M (SE) Zero.04 (.25) -Zero.32 (.25) -Zero.14 (.18)
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Hypothesis Three: Affect Congruence
A main-effect of affect congruence was hypothesized such that those who wrote about
negatively valenced recollections would level out elevated scores of unfavourable affect and reduce scores
of optimistic affect. Supporting the hypothesis, ANCOVA outcomes (see Desk eight and Desk 9)
demonstrated a vital impression of valence F (1, 219) = 4.66, p < .05, η2 = .02; these inside the positively
valence circumstances (Madj = 2.88) reported elevated scores of optimistic affect than these inside the
unfavourable valence circumstances (Madj = 2.64). Outcomes moreover indicated a vital impression of relationship
type, F (1, 219) = 6.42, p < .05, η2 = .03, the place those who wrote a couple of friendship (Madj = 2.90)
reported elevated scores of optimistic affect in distinction with those who wrote about an exrelationship (Madj = 2.62).
47
Desk eight
ANCOVA of Model Predicting Optimistic Affect
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 Zero.04 Zero.04 Zero.07
Measurement 1 Zero.44 Zero.44 Zero.67
Valence 1 Three.48 Three.48 4.66*
Relationship 1 4.29 4.29 6.42*
Valence * Relationship 1 Three.58 Three.58 5.64*
Corrected Model 5 11.73 2.35
Three.59** Error 219 143.29 Zero.65
Corrected Full 224 155.02
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Desk 9
Estimated Marginal Means, Foremost Outcomes and Simple Foremost Outcomes for Optimistic Affect
Optimistic Affect
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship 2.62 (.11) 2.63 (.10) 2.62 (.07) -Zero.01 (.15)
Friendship Three.16 (.11) 2.65 (.11) 2.90 (.08) Zero.51 (.16)**
M (SE) 2.89 (.08) 2.64 (.08) 2.76 (.05) Zero.25 (.11)*
∆M (SE) -Zero.53 (.16)** -Zero.02 (.15) -Zero.28 (.11)*
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
ANCOVA outcomes moreover supported the first outcomes for unfavourable affect, whereby these inside the
unfavourable valence circumstances reported elevated scores of unfavourable affect, F (1, 219) = 12.91, p <
.01, η2 = .06 (see Desk eight and Desk 9). The precept impression of relationship type, F (1, 219) = Three.50, p
= .Zero63, and the interaction time interval, F (1, 219) = Three.07 p = .081, η2 = .01, weren’t very important. As a result of the
interaction time interval was very important for optimistic affect, pairwise comparisons had been examined for
straightforward vital outcomes (see Desk 10). Outcomes indicated significantly elevated scores of unfavourable
affect from these inside the unfavourable friendship scenario compared with these inside the optimistic
friendship scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.44, p < .01, 95% CI [0.20, .68]). In addition to, these inside the optimistic
48
ex-relationship scenario indicated elevated unfavourable affect scores than these in optimistic friendship
scenario (ΔMadj = Zero.30, p < .05 95% CI [.07, .53]).
Desk 9
ANCOVA of Model Predicting Damaging Affect
Provide df SS MS F
Initiator 1 Zero.39 Zero.39 1.04
Measurement 1 5.00 5.00 13.32***
Valence 1 4.85 4.85 12.16**
Relationship 1 1.32 1.32 Three.43
Valence * Relationship 1 1.53 1.53 Three.07
Corrected Model 5 13.38 2.68
7.12** Error 219 82.27 Zero.38
Corrected Full 224 95.64
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Desk 10
Estimated Marginal Means, Foremost Outcomes and Simple Foremost Outcomes for Damaging Affect
Damaging Affect
Valence
Relationship Optimistic Damaging M (SE) ∆M (SE)
Ex-Relationship 1.73 (.08) 1.88 (.08) 1.80 (.06) -Zero.15 (.11)
Friendship 1.43 (.08) 1.87 (.09) 1.65 (.06) -Zero.44 (.12)***
M (SE) 1.58 (.06) 1.88 (.06) 1.73 (.04) -Zero.30 (.08)***
∆M (SE) Zero.30 (.12)* Zero.01 (.12) Zero.15 (.08)
*p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001
Curiously, an interaction impression was moreover found, F (1, 219) = 5.46, p < .05, η2 = .02,
the place these inside the optimistic friendship scenario reported elevated optimistic affect scores (Madj =
Three.16) than these inside the totally different circumstances, significantly, unfavourable friendship (Madj = 2.65), optimistic exrelationship (Madj = 2.62), and unfavourable ex-relationship (Madj = 2.63). Pairwise comparisons to
examine the simple vital outcomes indicated that writing about positively valenced friendship
recollections elicited increased optimistic affect that writing about negatively valenced friendship
49
recollections, (ΔMadj = Zero.51, p < .01, 95% CI [.19, .82]) and positively valenced ex-relationship
recollections (ΔMadj = Zero.53, p < .01, 95% CI [0.23, .84]). Which means that the optimistic affect of
valence on affect typically seen with positively valenced contemplating, along with proper right here with these
writing a couple of friendship, did not occur with these writing about positively valenced recollections
specific to a earlier romantic relationship. Estimated marginal means, vital outcomes, and straightforward
vital outcomes are reported in Desk eight. Decide 6 affords a visual illustration of the estimated
marginal means for optimistic affect.
Decide 6. Estimated marginal indicate optimistic affect by experimental manipulation of valence and
relationship type.
1
1.5
2
2.5
Three
Optimistic Damaging
Optimistic Affect
Valence
Ex-Relationship Friendship
50
CHAPTER 5
DISCUSSION
The current analysis examined the quick outcomes of partaking in predominantly
positively or predominantly negatively valenced critical about one’s most recent romantic exrelationship and whether or not or not these outcomes are distinctive from critical about recollections from a nonromantic relationship. Complete, findings supported the notion that recalling optimistic recollections
from a relationship may make it more durable to maneuver on from the connection that ended,
whereas recalling unfavourable recollections may make shifting on less complicated. As anticipated, participant
scores of rediscovery of self-concept and better optimistic adjustment had been elevated inside the unfavourable
ex-relationship scenario relative to the optimistic ex-relationship scenario. Conversely,
members inside the optimistic friendship scenario reported increased rediscovery of self-concept and
optimistic adjustment compared with these inside the unfavourable friendship scenario. Members in every
negatively valenced circumstances indicated elevated scores of unfavourable affect. Thus, although
individuals may actually really feel further unfavourable affect after recalling unfavourable recollections, there nonetheless seems to
be some adaptive facet to such a recall. This distinction illustrates the distinctive affect of exrelationship recollections, which are moreover what people are more likely to typically take into accounts when a
relationship ends (Self-discipline et al., 2009). That is, the reality that negatively valenced recollections had been
further advantageous relative to positively valenced recollections solely contained in the ex-relationship
circumstances signifies that this discovering is a outcomes of the valence inside the actual context of exrelationship recollections and by no means merely the outcomes of the unfavourable valence itself.
Curiously, whereas content material materials valence of ex-relationship concepts may differentially affect
the best way wherein by which one adapts to a relationship breakup, findings inside the current analysis did not
suggest any vital variations in how they may differentially have an effect on adversarial outcomes.
51
No very important interaction or vital outcomes had been current in predicting lack of self-concept and
unfavourable adjustment. Although outcomes from these constructs did not adjust to the hypothesized
predictions, these findings actually make sense when inspecting Brenner and Vogel’s (2015)
PANERT enchancment analysis further precisely. As soon as they assessed optimistic content material materials valence and
unfavourable content material materials valence as separate constructs, that they had been differentially linked to outcomes
related to shifting on within the equivalent pattern found inside the current analysis. That is, negatively valenced
concepts had been positively linked to outcomes related to shifting on, and positively valenced
concepts had been inversely linked to these adaptive outcomes. Moreover, every positively valenced
and negatively valenced concepts from an ex-relationship had been positively linked to further
distressing outcomes.
Results in the current analysis mirror these found by Brenner and Vogel (2015) and converse to
an fascinating pattern: critical about an ex-relationship may exacerbate unfavourable outcomes from
a breakup irrespective of content material materials valence, whereas critical about unfavourable qualities may also
improve optimistic outcomes related to shifting forward. An individual may actually really feel worse when
critical about an ex-partner regardless of the valenced thought. As feelings of shifting forward
are newer and feelings of loss are further acquainted, it may take further extremely efficient interventions to
mitigate these outcomes further. It’s potential that these unpleasant feelings remind an individual of
how they felt after the breakup.
These above variations in valence and outcomes had been found whatever the suggestion from
researchers that the best way wherein by which valence can have an effect on attitudes is through the affect that the
valenced thought elicits, and this affect ends to be congruent with the valence of the thought
(Segerstrom et al., 2003). Inside the current analysis, this congruence was found for every optimistic and
unfavourable affect, the place these in optimistic circumstances reported elevated optimistic affect and other people inside the
52
unfavourable scenario reported increased unfavourable affect. Nonetheless, there was moreover an stunning
interaction between relationship type and valence in predicting optimistic affect. It was anticipated
that individuals inside the optimistic valence circumstances would report elevated scores of optimistic affect
due to the tendency for affect to be congruent with content material materials valence; however, these inside the friendship
scenario reported increased optimistic affect than these in all totally different circumstances, along with optimistic exrelationship, who indicated statistically equal scores with each other. In numerous phrases, the
affect congruence with optimistic valence was solely present in those who wrote a couple of friendship.
Those who wrote about positively or negatively ex-relationship concepts expert the equivalent
stage of optimistic affect as those who wrote about negatively valenced concepts a couple of
friendship.
There are a variety of potential explanations for this discovering. First, take into consideration the outcomes for
unfavourable affect. The anticipated vital impression for content material materials valence was demonstrated, the place unfavourable
content material materials valence members reported further unfavourable affect. Although not very important, there was a
marginal vital impression of relationship type, the place these inside the ex-relationship scenario reported
increased unfavourable affect. Given this potential distinction by relationship type, critical about an exrelationship is troublesome in and of itself; on account of this reality, the unpleasantness of recalling a memory from
a earlier romantic relationship may dampen the optimistic affect of optimistic content material materials valence
recall.
One different likelihood is that the affect immediately following the writing train would not
match the affect all through exact moments of recall. This may be notably salient for these inside the
optimistic ex-relationship scenario, because of they’re recalling recollections from a time the place their
relationship standing is totally totally different from the present. Considering how a person may positively
appraise a relationship within the occasion that they experience optimistic affect when recalling a related memory,
53
positively valenced contemplating might reframe the ex-relationship in a optimistic light and reinforcing
need for an ex-partner. Remembering self-regulation thought, the discrepancy between an
specific individual’s current state and desired state can elicit distress and unfavourable affect. Fascinated by
relationship-positive experiences might actually really feel good inside the second; nonetheless, this optimistic emotion
may evaporate upon reconnecting with this discrepancy, or the reality that the connection no
longer exists. Lastly, individuals may be reluctant to admit to experiencing this congruent affect
due to the social pressure to maneuver forward from an ended relationship (Sas & Whittaker, 2013).
Limitations and Future Directions
As talked about above, having members reply to a self-report measure of affect
immediately following the writing train will not seize the exact affect expert as a result of the
train takes place. Future evaluation might deal with this concern via the utilization of physiological
measurement. Analysis using event-related thoughts potentials (ERPs) level out distinct neural
correlates related to optimistic and unfavourable affect all through affective picture processing. For instance,
the early posterior negativity (EPN) and a later posterior sluggish wave appear to reflect the
processing of unfavourable valence, whereas the P3 appeared to reflect the processing positivity valence
(Bailey, West, & Mullaney, 2012). Furthermore, these outcomes had been modulated by how
individuals had been oriented to the pictures. Folks responding to a self-report measure of
affect might experience a shift in affect immediately after recall, or may be reluctant to level
optimistic affect due to the social pressure. ERPs might current an reliable analysis of how an
specific individual responds to these affect-laden recollections all through recall.
The confound of timing (i.e., earlier or present) inside the relationship circumstances can be an
important limitation to deal with. The inclusion of the friendship scenario helped distinguish that
the outcomes for the ex-relationship circumstances had been specific to the character of valence inside the context
54
of ex-relationship-memories significantly versus valence inside interpersonal recollections
further often. In addition to, because of social assistance is an adaptive coping mechanism, friendship
recollections may help characterize the frequent experience of looking for social assist after a breakup.
Nonetheless, members inside the ex-relationship scenario wrote a couple of relationship that was inside the
earlier and romantic, and members inside the friendship scenario wrote a couple of relationship that
was current and platonic. Outcomes had been interpreted as an interaction of valence and relationship
type; nonetheless, it is potential that these findings relate to an interaction of valence and time (i.e.,
earlier or present relationship). If the latter is true, it won’t negate the findings of the current
analysis; moderately, it should suggest that the outcomes from the current analysis might generalize to shifting
on from totally different relationships which have ended, comparable to a friendship fallout or positive sorts of grief.
Future analysis might look at the have an effect on of optimistic valence and unfavourable valence all through
utterly totally different relationship kinds which have ended and along with current.
All finish consequence measures on this analysis had been self-report scale measures. Inspecting Decide Three
and Decide 4, the unfavourable outcomes present a visual pattern based on the hypotheses, however
the impression measurement is simply too small to be very important. This lack of significance may mirror a really
insignificant impression, or it may relate to the utilization of scale measures as finish consequence variables. Although
scale measurement affords a number of advantages, the impression of the manipulation may fade over time
as members reply to quite a few scale devices inside each measure. One totally different methodology to in
seize the quick affect of ex-relationship memory valence is the utilization of behavioral
finish consequence measures. As an example, after the writing train, members could be offered free
enrollment in an online based mostly relationship website online. A behavioral measure of this kind carried out straight
following the intervention would best seize the quick impression of the manipulation. Findings
moreover could be further straight generalized to precise world conduct.
55
In addition to, a longitudinal analysis the place members work together inside the writing train on
quite a few occasions might examine how valenced memory recall may play out over time. This
would moreover assist the usefulness of scale measurement as outcomes because of we would be
fascinated with every the quick outcomes of the writing train along with the broader change
attributable to the outcomes over time. Moreover, researchers might assess how briskly outcomes
seen after preliminary interventions may work along with self-report responses in the long run.
There are moreover limitations regarding the sample. Members had been school college students from Iowa
State School who expert a breakup contained in the earlier yr. Gathering info from these
school college students and controlling for time as a result of the breakup allowed for further atmosphere pleasant participant
recruitment. Regardless that this evaluation produced quite a few vital and very important findings, it is
potential that the affect of content material materials valence is way more extremely efficient than indicated by these outcomes.
Future researchers might prohibit the sample to those who expert a very present breakup, such
as inside the sooner month. This may seize responses whereas in a further distressed state. In
addition, since this generally is a school pupil sample, it is potential that members had been writing about
their first principal breakup. Gathering particulars in regards to the number of breakups expert by
the members might lend information regarding whether or not or not how people reply to a breakup
modifications with further experience. Almost all of members acknowledged as European American.
Cross-cultural variations in responding to a breakup could possibly be important to take a look at. Values
differ between cultures and likewise contribute to cognitions (Cross, Morris & Gore, 2002). Future
researchers might conduct this analysis with numerous samples and likewise examine for values or themes
that can differ between members from numerous cultural backgrounds.
56
Conclusion
Findings from the current analysis suggest that there are utterly totally different quick state-induced
outcomes on account of partaking in predominantly positively valenced or predominantly negatively
valenced critical about one’s most recent romantic ex-relationship. Notably, outcomes lend
assist to an rising idea that positively valenced reflection on a romantic relationship that
ended may be harmful, whereas negatively valenced reflection might very nicely have useful
choices. Earlier evaluation has examined this concept using associations of pertinent breakup
outcomes with a scale measure of the diploma to which individuals take into accounts optimistic and
unfavourable factors from their ex-relationship mainly (Brenner & Vogel, 2015). The current
experiment constructed upon this line of research by inspecting the quick state-induced outcomes of
differentially valenced concepts about an ex-relationship and establishing a causal hyperlink with these
seen outcomes. Outcomes level out that the differential affect of content material materials valence was specific to
outcomes related to shifting on from the connection versus specializing within the unpleasant
penalties of the breakup. The current analysis moreover extends our understanding of this pattern by
differentiating the affect of content material materials valence of ex-relationship concepts from concepts a couple of
non-romantic relationship. Outcomes level out that affect of content material materials valence is unique on this
context from totally different interpersonal sorts of memory. The directions by which valence of exrelationship concepts related to these outcomes had been the opposite from how valence impacted
these outcomes when critical a few pal.
Fascinated by a romantic relationship after it ends is a typical and distressing response
to a breakup. The current analysis examined thought content material materials valence, which could affect the
appraisal or which implies we connect with the subject of our concepts (Segerstrom et al., 2003) along with
our romantic relationships (Alea & Bluck, 2007; Bazzini et al., 2007). Regardless that contemplating
57
about an ex-relationship in a negatively valenced means may actually really feel hurtful inside the second, outcomes
indicated that this negatively valenced means might very nicely decrease the enchantment of that exrelationship and, in flip, encourage optimistic feelings in direction of no longer being with the ex-partner
and help individuals to maneuver on. Continued examination of the distinctive affect of content material materials valence
on this context might play a major place inside the growth of coping responses specific to
the frequent, however painful, experience of a romantic relationship breakup.
58
REFERENCES
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies all through
psychopathology: A meta-analytic overview. Scientific Psychology Analysis, 30(2), 217–237.
doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.Zero04
Alea, N., & Bluck, S. (2007). I’ll Maintain You in Ideas : The Intimacy Carry out of
Autobiographical Memory. Utilized Cognitive Psychology, 21(December 2006), 1091–
1111. doi:10.1002/acp
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Sturdy, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward,
motivation, and emotion strategies associated to early-stage intense romantic love.
Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 327–337. doi:10.1152/jn.00838.2004
Bailey, Okay., West, R., & Mullaney, Okay. M. (2012). Neural correlates of processing unfavourable and
sexually arousing footage. PloS one, 7(9), e45522.
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic
love. Neuroimage, 21(Three), 1155-1166
Battaglia, D. M., Richard, F. D., Datteri, D. L., & Lord, C. G. (1998). Breaking up is (comparatively)
easy to do: A script for the dissolution of shut relationships. Journal of Social and
Non-public Relationships, 15(6), 829-845.
Bazzini, D. G., Stack, E. R., Martincin, P. D., & Davis, C. P. (2006). The Impression of Reminiscing
about Laughter on Relationship Satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 25–34.
doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9045-6
Beike, D. R., Adams, L. P., & Wirth-Beaumont, E. T. (2007). Incomplete inhibition of emotion
particularly autobiographical recollections. Memory, 15(4), 375-389.
59
Beike, D., & Wirth-Beaumont, E. (2005). Psychological closure as a memory
phenomenon. Memory, 13(6), 574-593.
Berntsen, D., & Bohn, A. (2010). Remembering and forecasting: The relation between
autobiographical memory and episodic future contemplating. Memory & Cognition, 38(Three),
265–278. doi:10.3758/MC.38.Three.265
Bluck, S. (2003). Autobiographical memory: Exploring its capabilities in frequently life. Memory,
11(2), 113–123. doi:10.1080/741938206
Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T., & Rubin, D. C. (2005). A narrative of three capabilities: The selfreported makes use of of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23(1), 91–117.
doi:10.1521/soco.23.1.91.59198
Boelen, P. A., & Reijntjes, A. (2009). Damaging cognitions in emotional points following
romantic relationship break-ups. Stress and Properly being, 25(August 2008), 11–19.
doi:10.1002/smi
Breiter H.C., Gollub R.L., Weisskoff, R.M., Kennedy D.N., Makris N., Berke J.D., Goodman
J.M., Kantor H.L., Gastfriend D.R., Riorden J.P., Mathew R.T., Rosen B.R., Hyman S.E.
(1997). Acute outcomes of cocaine on human thoughts train and emotion. Neuron 19: 591–
611.
Brenner, R. E., & Vogel, D. L. (2015). Measuring Thought Content material materials Valence After a Breakup:
Enchancment of the Optimistic and Damaging Ex-Relationship Concepts (PANERT) Scale.
Journal of Counseling Psychology. doi: http://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000073
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Self-consciousness and reactance.Journal of Evaluation in
Character, 15(1), 16-29.
60
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of conduct. New York:
Cambridge School Press.
Chaulk, Okay., & Jones, T. (2011). On-line Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Extra Points About
Fb. Journal of Family Violence, 26(4), 245–254. doi:10.1007/s10896-Zero11-9360-x
Choo, P., Levine, T., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Gender, love schemas, and reactions to romantic
break-ups. Journal of Social Habits and Character,11(5), 143-160.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press: New
York
Collins II, J. E., & Clark, L. F. (1989). Accountability and rumination: The problem with
understanding the dissolution of a relationship. Social Cognition, 7(2), 152–173.
doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.152
Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Fascinated by oneself and others: The
relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Character and
Social Psychology, 82(Three), 399–418. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.Three.399
D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Phenomenal traits associated to
projecting oneself once more into the earlier and forward into the long term: Have an effect on of valence and
temporal distance. Consciousness and cognition, 13(4), 844-858.
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2003). Bodily, Emotional, and Behavioral
Reactions to Breaking Up: The Roles of Gender, Age, Emotional Involvement, and
Attachment Mannequin. Character and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 871–884.
doi:10.1177/0146167203029007006
61
Dutton, L. B., & Winstead, B. A. (2006). Predicting undesirable pursuit: Attachment, relationship
satisfaction, relationship alternate choices, and break-up distress. Journal of Social and
Non-public Relationships, 23(4), 565-586.
Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A thought of purpose self consciousness. Oxford, England:
Academic Press.
Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Broken Hearts and Broken Bones: A Neural Perspective on the
Similarities Between Social and Bodily Ache. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 21(1), 42–47. doi:10.1177/0963721411429455
Fagundes, C. P. (2012). Getting over you: Contributions of attachment thought for postbreakup
emotional adjustment. Non-public Relationships, 19(1), 37–50. doi:10.1111/j.1475-
6811.2010.01336.x
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power Three: A flexible statistical
power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Habits
evaluation methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1992). Attachment mannequin and romantic love: Relationship
dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 69-74.
Self-discipline, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in school
school college students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.
Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The character and chemistry of romantic love. New York: Henry
Holt.
Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Sturdy, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, behavior, and
emotion regulation strategies associated to rejection in love. Journal of
Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60. doi:10.1152/jn.00784.2009
62
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Pondering of you: nonconscious pursuit of
interpersonal goals associated to relationship companions. Journal of Character and
Social Psychology, 84(1), 148.
Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: The prevalence
and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 666-669.
Griffin-Shelley, E. (1991). Intercourse and love. Dependancy, treatment, & restoration. Westport, CT:
Praeger.
Halpern, H.M (1982). One of the simplest ways to Break Your Dependancy to a Particular person. New York: McGraw-Hill,
1982.
Haugaard, J. J., & Seri, L. G. (2003). Stalking and various kinds of intrusive contact after the
dissolution of adolescent relationship or romantic relationships.Violence and victims, 18(Three),
279-297.
Haugaard, J. J., & Seri, L. G. (2004). Stalking and Totally different Varieties of Intrusive Contact amongst
Adolescents and Youthful Adults from the Perspective of the Particular person Initiating the Intrusive
Contact. Felony Justice and Habits, 31(1), 37–54. doi:10.1177/0093854803259247
Joormann, J., & Siemer, M. (2004). Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria:
difficulties in repairing sad mood with utterly happy recollections? Journal of Irregular
Psychology, 113(2), 179–88. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.179
Josephson, B. R., Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Mood Regulation and Memory : Repairing
Sad Moods with Fully happy Reminiscences. Cognition & Emotion, 10(4), 437–444.
doi:10.1080/026999396380222
Keefe, Okay., & Berndt, T. J. (1996). Relations of friendship top quality to shallowness in early
adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 110-129.
63
Kloss, J. D., & Lisman, S. A. (2002). An exposure-based examination of the implications of written
emotional disclosure. British Journal Of Properly being Psychology, 7(1), 31.
Knox, D., Zusman, M. E., Kaluzny, M., & Cooper, C. (2000). College pupil restoration from a
broken coronary coronary heart. College Pupil Journal, 34(Three), 322–324.
Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection
shares somatosensory representations with bodily ache, 108(15), 6270–6275.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1102693108/-
/DCSupplemental.www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1102693108
Kubzansky, L. D., Kawachi, I., Spiro, A., Weiss, S. T., Vokonas, P. S., & Sparrow, D. (1997). Is
worrying unhealthy in your coronary coronary heart? A possible analysis of worry and coronary coronary coronary heart sickness in
the normative getting outdated analysis. Circulation, 95, 818–824.
Lam, D., Schuck, N., Smith, N., Farmer, A., & Checkley, S. (2003). Response mannequin,
interpersonal difficulties and social functioning in principal depressive dysfunction. Journal of
Affective Issues, 75(Three), 279-283.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer, et al. “Breaking up is hard to do: Undesirable pursuit behaviors
following the dissolution of a romantic relationship.” Violence and victims 15.1 (2000):
73-90.
Lannin, D. G., Guyll, M., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2013). Decreasing the stigma associated
with looking for psychotherapy via self-affirmation. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
60(4), 508–519. doi:10.1037/a0033789
Le, B., Dove, N. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital
romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Non-public Relationships,
17(Three), 377–390. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
64
Lepore, S. J., & Greenberg, M. a. (2002). Mending Broken Hearts: Outcomes of Expressive Writing
on Mood, Cognitive Processing, Social Adjustment and Properly being Following a Relationship
Breakup. Psychology & Properly being, 17(5), 547–560. doi:10.1080/08870440290025768
Lewandowski, G. W. (2009). Promoting optimistic emotions following relationship dissolution
via writing. The Journal of Optimistic Psychology, 4(1), 21–31.
doi:10.1080/17439760802068480
Lewandowski, G. W., Aron, A., Bassis, S., & Kunak, J. (2006). Dropping a self-expanding
relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Non-public Relationships, 13(Three), 317–331.
Lewandowski, G. W., & Bizzoco, N. M. (2007). Addition via subtraction: Progress following
the dissolution of a low top quality relationship. The Journal of Optimistic Psychology, 2(1),
40–54. doi:10.1080/17439760601069234
Liebowitz, M. R. (1983). The chemistry of affection. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Locker Jr, L., McIntosh, W. D., Hackney, A. A., Wilson, J. H., & Wiegand, Okay. E. (2010). The
breakup of romantic relationships: Situational predictors of notion of restoration. North
American Journal of Psychology, 12(Three), 565.
Lyndon, A., Bonds-Raacke, J., & Cratty, A. D. (2011). College school college students’ Fb stalking of
ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Habits and Social Networking, 14(12), 711–6.
doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0588
Marshall, T. C. (2012). Fb surveillance of former romantic companions: associations with
postbreakup restoration and personal progress. Cyberpsychology, Habits and Social
Networking, 15(10), 521–6. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0125
65
Grasp, S. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Taylor, S. E., Naliboff, B. D., Shirinyan, D., & Lieberman, M.
D. (2009). A picture’s worth: companion photos reduce experimentally induced ache.
Psychological Science, 20(11), 1316–eight. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02444.x
Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative concepts. Advances in social cognition, 9,
1-47.
Mellody P., Miller A.W., & Miller Okay. (1992) Coping with Love Dependancy. New York: Harper, San
Francisco.
Moller, N. P., Fouladi, R. T., McCarthy, C. J., & Hatch, Okay. D. (2003). Relationship of attachment
and social assist to high school school college students’ adjustment following a relationship
breakup. Journal of Counseling & Enchancment, 81(Three), 354-369.
Monroe, S. M., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1999). Life events and despair
in adolescence: relationship loss as a possible risk situation for first onset of principal
depressive dysfunction. Journal of Irregular Psychology, 108(4), 606.
Najib, A., Lorberbaum, J. P., Kose, S., Bohning, D. E., & George, M. S. (2004). Regional thoughts
train in women grieving a romantic relationship breakup. The American Journal of
Psychiatry, 161(12), 2245–56. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2245
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Larson, J., & Grayson, C. (1999). Explaining the gender distinction in
depressive indicators. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1061–72.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed
mood following loss. Journal of character and social psychology, 67(1), 92.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking Rumination.
Views on Psychological Science, Three(5), 400–424. doi:10.1111/j.1745-
6924.2008.00088.x
66
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954). Optimistic reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal
area and totally different areas of rat thoughts. Journal of Comparative and Physiological
Psychology,, 47(6), 419–427.
Ortigue, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Hamilton, a F. D. C., & Grafton, S. T. (2007). The neural
basis of affection as a subliminal prime: an event-related helpful magnetic resonance
imaging analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(7), 1218–30.
doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1218
Park, C. L., & Blumberg, C. J. (2002). Disclosing trauma via writing: Testing the meaningmaking hypothesis. Cognitive Treatment and Evaluation,26(5), 597-616.
Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1975). Love and behavior. Oxford, England: Taplinger.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. Okay. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: in direction of an
understanding of inhibition and sickness. Journal of irregular psychology,95(Three), 274.
Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking up Romantic Relationships : Costs Expert
and Coping Strategies Deployed. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 164–181.
Perrier, C. P. Okay., Boucher, R., Etchegary, H., Sadava, S. W., & Molnar, D. S. (2010). The utility
of attachment orientation and social assist in predicting traumatic distress. Canadian
Journal of Behavioural Science, 42, 71-79
Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., Beaulieu-Pelletier, G., Lecours, S., & Lekes, N. (2012). The place of
episodic recollections in current and future well-being. Character and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 38, 505-519.
Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Lekes, N. (2013). On the directive function of episodic recollections
in people’s lives: a take a look at romantic relationships. Journal of Character and Social
Psychology, 104(1), 164–79. doi:10.1037/a0030384
67
Pillemer, D. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid recollections: How unforgettable moments help us
understand the which implies of our lives.
Pillemer, D. B. (2001). Momentous events and the life story. Analysis of Widespread
Psychology, 5(2), 123.
Pillemer, D. (2003). Directive capabilities of autobiographical memory: The guiding power of the
specific episode. Memory, 11(2), 193–202. doi:10.1080/741938208
Prigerson, H. O., & Jacobs, S. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a particular dysfunction: A rationale,
consensus requirements, and a preliminary empirical check out.
Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. Okay., Reynolds III, C. F., Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T.,
Fasiczka, A., … Miller, M. (1995). Inventory of Refined Grief: a scale to measure
maladaptive indicators of loss. Psychiatry Evaluation, 59(1), 65–79.
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Self-regulatory perseveration and the depressive selffocusing mannequin: a self-awareness thought of reactive despair. Psychological
bulletin, 102(1), 122
Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2013). The reality of the earlier versus the ideality of the long term:
emotional valence and helpful variations between earlier and future psychological time journey.
Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 187–200. doi:10.3758/s13421-Zero12-0260-y
Risinger, R. C., Salmeron, B. J., Ross, T. J., Amen, S. L., Sanfilipo, M., Hoffmann, R. G., …
Stein, E. A. (2005). Neural correlates of extreme and craving all through cocaine selfadministration using BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage, 26(4), 1097–1108.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.Zero30
68
Roach, A. R., Salt, C. E., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Generalizability of Repetitive Thought:
Inspecting Stability in Thought Content material materials and Course of. Cognitive Treatment and Evaluation,
34(2), 144–158. doi:10.1007/s10608-Zero09-9232-Three
Roberts, J. E., Gilboa, E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Ruminative response mannequin and vulnerability to
episodes of dysphoria: Gender, neuroticism, and episode size. Cognitive Treatment and
Evaluation, 22(4), 401-423.
Robinson, J. A., & Hawpe, L. (1986). Narrative contemplating as a heuristic course of.
Saffrey, C., & Ehrenberg, M. (2007). When contemplating hurts: Attachment, rumination, and
postrelationship adjustment. Non-public Relationships, 14(Three), 351–368.
Sanna, L., J., & Turkley-Ames, Okay. J. (2000). Counterfactual depth. European Journal of
Social Psychology, 30, 273–296.
Sas, C., & Whittaker, S. (2013, April). Design for forgetting: Disposing of digital possessions
after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Elements in
Computing Strategies (pp. 1823-1832). ACM.
Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the Onset of Emotional Restoration Following Nonmarital
Relationship Dissolution: Survival Analyses of Disappointment and Anger. Character and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(Three), 298–312. doi:10.1177/0146167205280913
Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship
dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Non-public
Relationships, 12(2), 213-232.
Schaef, A. W. (1989). Escape from intimacy: the pseudo-relationship addictions: untangling
the” love” addictions, intercourse, romance, relationships. Harper & Row.
69
Shulman, S. (1993). Shut relationships and coping conduct in adolescence. Journal of
adolescence, 16(Three), 267-283.
Segerstrom, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Alden, L. E., & Shortridge, B. E. (2003). A Multidimensional
Building for Repetitive Thought: What’s on Your Ideas, and How, and How Rather a lot?
Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 85(5), 909–921. doi:10.1037/0022-
3514.85.5.909
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2011). How do youthful adolescents tackle social points? an
examination of social goals, coping with associates, and social adjustment. The Journal of
Early Adolescence, 0272431611429944.
Slotter, E. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2012). How Needing You Modifications Me: The Have an effect on of
Attachment Anxiousness on Self-concept Malleability in Romantic Relationships. Self and
Id, 11(Three), 386–408. doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.591538
Sprecher, S. (1994). Two sides to the breakup of relationship relationships. Non-public Relationships,
1, 199-222,
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Metts, S., Fehr, B., & Vanni, D. (1998). Elements associated to
distress following the breakup of an in depth relationship. Journal of Social and Non-public
Relationships, 15(6), 791–809.
Tashiro, T. Y., & Frazier, P. (2003). “I’ll in no way be in a relationship like that after extra”: Non-public
progress following romantic relationship breakups. Non-public Relationships, 10(1), 113–
128.
Tennov, D. (1979). Love and Limerance: The Experience of Being in Love in New York. New
York: Stein and Day.
70
Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model
of character: distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Character and
Social Psychology, 76(2), 284–304.
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic Memory: From Ideas to Thoughts. Annual Analysis of Psychology, 53,
1–25.
Ullrich, P. M., & Lutgendorf, S. Okay. (2002). Journaling about worrying events: Outcomes of cognitive
processing and emotional expression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(Three), 244-250.
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Telang, F., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Childress, A. R., … & Wong, C.
(2006). Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine
behavior. The Journal of neuroscience,26(24), 6583-6588.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Enchancment and validation of short-term measures
of optimistic and unfavourable affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Character and Social
Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
Wheeler, M. a, Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997). In direction of a thought of episodic memory: the
frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 121(Three), 331–54.
Xu, X., Aron, A., Brown, L., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2011). Reward and motivation
strategies: a thoughts mapping analysis of early-stage intense romantic love in Chinese language language
members. Human Thoughts Mapping, 32(2), 249–57. doi:10.1002/hbm.21017
71
APPENDIX A
EXPERIMENTAL MEASURES
Rediscovery of Self Scale (ROSS)
DIRECTIONS: Please charge the diploma to which the subsequent phrases are true of you since your
relationship breakup. Responses differ from 1 (under no circumstances) to 7 (an unbelievable deal).
To realize: Widespread devices—1 via 6.
Not
the least bit Not typically Generally Significantly Fairly
A
trustworthy
bit
A
good
deal
1. I’ve achieved the problems I as quickly as
liked that I could not do whereas
I was in my relationship.
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
2. I’ve regained my id. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
Three. I’ve reclaimed misplaced parts of
myself that I could not particular
whereas with my companion.
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
4. I’ve focused further on my needs
that had been neglected whereas with
my companion.
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
5. I’ve develop into reacquainted with
the actual individual I was sooner than the
relationship.
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
6. I’ve rediscovered who I am. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
72
Lack of Self Scale (LOSS)
DIRECTIONS: Please charge the diploma to which the subsequent phrases are true of you since your
relationship breakup. Responses differ from 1 (under no circumstances) to 7 (an unbelievable deal).
To realize: Widespread devices—1 via 6.
Not at
all Not typically Generally Significantly Fairly A great
bit
An superior
deal
1. I don’t know who I am. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
2. I’ve misplaced my sense of self. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
Three. I actually really feel as if I am missing a
part of me. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
4. I actually really feel as if plenty of my
good qualities have been misplaced. 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
5. I do not actually really feel like myself
anymore.
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
6. I actually really feel incomplete 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
73
Relationship Adjustment Measure
DIRECTIONS: Consider your emotional reactions to your relationship breakup-up and
level out the extent to which you at current experience the subsequent emotions should you suppose
regarding the misplaced relationship.
To realize Optimistic Adjustment: Widespread 7 devices—2, Three, 5, 6, eight, 11, 14,
To realize Damaging Adjustment: Widespread 9 devices—1, 4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16
On no account Not typically Generally Significantly Fairly A great
bit
Very
loads
1. Depressed 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
2. Content material materials 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
Three. Delighted 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
4. Aggravated 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
5. Fully happy 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
6. Relieved 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
7. Miserable 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
eight. Comfortable 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
9. Upset 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
10. Sad 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
11. Glad 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
12. Irritated 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
13. Injury 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
14. Comfortable 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
15. Accountable 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
16. Lonely 1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
74
Optimistic and Damaging Affect Scale (PANAS)
DIRECTIONS: This scale consists of various phrases that describe utterly totally different feelings and
emotions. Be taught each merchandise after which circle the acceptable reply inside the space subsequent to that phrase.
Level out the extent to which you are feeling each emotion correct now.
To realize Optimistic Affect: Sum 10 devices—1, Three, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19
To realize Damaging Affect: Sum 10 devices—2, 4, 6, 7, eight, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20
Very barely or
under no circumstances Barely Fairly Pretty a bit Terribly
1. 1 2 Three 4 5
2. Distressed 1 2 Three 4 5
Three. Excited 1 2 Three 4 5
4. Upset 1 2 Three 4 5
5. Sturdy 1 2 Three 4 5
6. Accountable 1 2 Three 4 5
7. Scared 1 2 Three 4 5
eight. Hostile 1 2 Three 4 5
9. Enthusiastic 1 2 Three 4 5
10. Proud 1 2 Three 4 5
11. Irritable 1 2 Three 4 5
12. Alert 1 2 Three 4 5
13. Ashamed 1 2 Three 4 5
14. Impressed 1 2 Three 4 5
15. Nervous 1 2 Three 4 5
16. Determined 1 2 Three 4 5
17. Attentive 1 2 Three 4 5
18. Jittery 1 2 Three 4 5
19. Vigorous 1 2 Three 4 5
20. Afraid 1 2 Three 4 5
75
Breakup Questions
How manner again did the connection end (in months)? _______
Who ended the connection?
Me Largely Me Significantly me Mutual Significantly
Affiliate
Largely
Affiliate
My Affiliate
1 2 Three 4 5 6 7
76
APPENDIX B
IRB APPROVAL
77
APPENDIX C
WRITING INSTRUCTIONS
State of affairs 1 (Optimistic Ex-Relationship)
Directions: We would like you to think about your closing crucial relationship. This should be a
relationship that lasted for some time or by which you had been considerably emotionally involved
sooner than the breakup. Do not examine with a relationship that broke up after just a few dates.
For the next 10 minutes, please write a couple of optimistic memory (e.g., utterly happy, romantic) you had
alongside together with your ex-partner should you had been collectively. Describe this memory in as loads aspect as
potential – what occurred, what you and your companion did, the best way you felt – really let go and uncover
your very deepest emotions and concepts by the time that this memory befell. Do not
worry about grammar and spelling. In case you’re achieved sooner than the ten minutes is up, proceed to
describe totally different recollections of this nature.
State of affairs 2 (Damaging Ex-Relationship)
Directions: We would like you to think about your closing crucial relationship. This should be a
relationship that lasted for some time or by which you had been considerably emotionally involved
sooner than the breakup. Do not examine with a relationship that broke up after just a few dates.
For the next 10 minutes, please write a couple of unfavourable memory (e.g., unhappy, hurtful, sad,
offended) you have received alongside together with your ex-partner should you had been collectively. Describe this memory in as loads
aspect as potential – what occurred, what you and your companion did, the best way you felt – really let go and
uncover your very deepest emotions and concepts by the time that this memory befell.
Don’t fret about grammar and spelling. In case you’re achieved sooner than the ten minutes is up, proceed
to elucidate totally different recollections of this nature.
State of affairs Three (Optimistic Friendship)
Directions: We would like you to think about a friendship that is important to you. This
friendship should be a relationship that is vital and/or has lasted for some time.
For the next 10 minutes, please write a couple of optimistic memory (e.g., good, utterly happy) you had
alongside together with your pal. Describe this memory in as loads aspect as potential – what occurred, what you
and your pal did, the best way you felt – really let go and uncover your very deepest emotions and
concepts by the time that this memory befell. Don’t fret about grammar and spelling.
In case you’re achieved sooner than the ten minutes is up, proceed to elucidate totally different recollections of this nature.
State of affairs 4 (Damaging Friendship)
Directions: We would like you to think about a friendship that is important to you. This
friendship should be a relationship that is vital and/or has lasted for some time.
78
For the next 10 minutes, please write a couple of unfavourable (e.g., unhappy, hurtful, sad, offended)
memory you had alongside together with your pal. Describe this memory in as loads aspect as potential – what
occurred, what you and your pal did, the best way you felt – really let go and uncover your very
deepest emotions and concepts by the time that this memory befell. Don’t fret about
grammar and spelling. In case you’re achieved sooner than the ten minutes is up, proceed to elucidate totally different
recollections of this nature.

Published by

Essays

View all posts