Posted: January 30th, 2022

Assessment 1 (DRAFT) Project Dissertation

Undertaking Dissertation

Evaluation 1 (DRAFT)

FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
Your title and the title of your undertaking have to be clearly proven. Use the template offered for the entrance cowl.
• A4 paper with regular margins
• The textual content measurement must be 12-point Arial with 1.5 line spacing, apart from the Summary and prolonged quotations which must be single spaced
• All pages must be numbered
• All figures and tables must be numbered consecutively
• The textual content of the dissertation must be written within the third particular person in an goal, formal and impersonal fashion, for instance, “Analysis was carried out …” Slightly than “I carried out analysis …”
INSTRUCTIONS
This evaluation is price 20% of the module marks.
By 1200 on Tuesday 2nd March, you should make an e-submission of your interim report. It will include:
• An inventory of contents
• Lists of figures and tables
• An introduction to your dissertation
• A draft model of your literature evaluate
• An overview of the methodology and analysis strategies
• An inventory of references
• A analysis timetable or Gantt chart with deliberate milestones
• A accomplished ethics kind
Size: between 2,500-Three,000 phrases. Absolutely the most is Three,000 phrases.

This work is the primary draft of the early chapters of your last dissertation. You do NOT want an summary or govt abstract. You will have an inventory of contents and listing of references, which don’t rely in direction of the phrase restrict.

REFERENCING
Aside from Legislation dissertations, you’re to make use of Harvard referencing within the Cite Them Proper or Plymouth Harvard fashion. You might be strongly really useful to utilize referencing software program, both in Phrase or Endnote. Your references are anticipated to be of excellent educational high quality with the emphasis on peer-reviewed educational journals. For evaluation 1, you need to have a number of pages of references.

MARKING CRITERIA
Your work will likely be marked on the next standards and weighting.
• Introduction (20 marks)
• Literature evaluate (25 marks)
• Analysis methodology (25 marks)
• Report writing (20 marks)
• Planning and presentation (10 marks)

Use the marking rubric beneath to information you in direction of the usual and content material which are anticipated of excellent high quality work. Your supervisor will mark this work and the module chief will reasonable it.
Introduction 20 marks Literature evaluate 25 marks Analysis methodology 25 marks Report Writing 20 marks Planning and Presentation 10 marks
First (80 – 100) A difficult or essential analysis downside. Intention and goals very well-articulated. Form of the ultimate dissertation given.
16 to 20 marks Complete or excellent vital evaluate and synthesis of educational literature on this space. A robust vital perspective that exposes gaps and limitations in present information. Skilful argument.
20 to 25 marks Could also be a novel or uncommon methodology or analysis method. Excellent, detailed and well-presented methodology, totally justified.
Clear and acceptable analysis design.

20 to 25 marks Clear, concise and fluent fashion with no spelling or grammar errors. Fluent and nicely structured, related diagrams, photos, figures. Right referencing 16 to 20 marks Excellent high quality of presentation. All parts appropriate.
Distinctive proof of planning and organisation.

Eight-10 marks
First (70 – 79) A well timed and/or essential analysis downside. Intention and goals well-articulated, clear and acceptable. Form of the ultimate dissertation given.

14-15 marks Distinctive scholarship. A complete vary of related literature is used. A vital perspective and a capability to exposes gaps and limitations in present information. A coherent set of arguments. Fluent synthesis.
18-19 marks The methodology is complete: it explains, and justifies the analysis method, methods and knowledge assortment strategies.
Clear and acceptable analysis design.

18-19 marks Work is fluent, centered and concise. Glorious construction. Good communication for each specialist and non-specialist audiences.
Only a few errors in spelling or grammar.
Good referencing.
14-15 marks Glorious commonplace of presentation. All parts appropriate.
Distinctive proof of planning and organisation.

7 marks
Higher Second (60 – 69) A well timed and/or related analysis downside. Intention and goals clearly outlined. Form of the ultimate dissertation OR the present report given.
12-13 marks Good protection of ideas primarily from educational sources. A coherent and logical argument. Vital in fashion and demonstrates good understanding
15-17 marks Good methodology. Good justification for the chosen analysis method.
Acceptable analysis design.
15-17 marks Very clear and nicely structured, referencing and bibliography structure appropriate.
12-13 marks Good commonplace of presentation. All parts appropriate.
Good proof of planning and organisation.

6 marks
Decrease Second (50 – 59) Acceptable analysis matter. Intention/analysis query recognized with goals.
Form of the ultimate dissertation OR the present report given.

10-11 marks Acceptable materials accessed however is probably not fairly up-to-date. Reasoning and argument are typically related. Some proof of vital evaluation and synthesis: not an inventory or bibliography. Little depth to the argument.
13-14 marks All the weather of methodology are current together with some justification, however it doesn’t describe the info assortment and evaluation methods used within the examine intimately.
Acceptable analysis design.
13-14 marks A superb construction. Usually good communication. Most likely some errors in spelling, grammar and/or referencing.
Could also be barely over or beneath size.
10-11 marks Passable commonplace of presentation.
Components typically current and proper. Passable proof of planning and organisation.

5 marks
Third (40 – 49) Weaknesses within the selection of matter, analysis query, intention and/or goals
Eight-9 marks Largely descriptive. Restricted protection of literature, which can be of low high quality in some areas. Demonstrates enough understanding.
10-12 marks Strategies of knowledge assortment and evaluation given however missing element. Could also be some gaps or inaccuracies.

10-12 marks Construction is a little bit tough to comply with, some lack of readability. Some references
Eight-9 marks Enough commonplace of presentation. Components typically current and proper however weak.

four marks
(30 – 39) Selection of matter could also be weak or inappropriate. Inappropriate or unclear intention and/or goals. Little analysis background or poor justification for the analysis. 6-7marks Literature lined is just not related and/or outdated and never from educational sources
Eight-9 marks Doesn’t meet threshold standards, for instance:
> analysis technique confused
>no consideration of other approaches
>no point out of research
OR detailed methodology that’s of restricted originality
Eight-9 marks Very confused and missing in readability and organisation. Lack of references.

6-7 marks Poor commonplace of presentation. A number of parts absent. Inadequate planning to satisfy threshold standards.

Three marks
(Zero – 29) Selection of matter weak or inappropriate. No intention and/or goals recognized, OR they’re inappropriate.
Zero-5 marks No literature lined or literature lined is just not related and out of scope
Zero-7 marks Some try at an outline of technique however no knowledge gathering or evaluation strategies chosen
OR detailed methodology that’s not authentic.
Zero-7 marks Vital parts lacking. Failure to speak. Conventions not adopted. Unacceptably transient. Absent or very poor referencing
Zero-5 marks Failure to think about presentation of labor. No proof of planning. No ethics kind. Most likely no cowl sheet.

Zero-2 marks

Order | Check Discount

Tags: 150-200 words discussion with a scholarly reference, 200-300 words response to classmate discussion question, 250 word analysis essay, are dissertation writing services legal, bachelor of nursing assignments