EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE OF REINFOCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS: A CASE STUDY FROM MARMARA TURKEY Korkut Mirzai 08074260 Bachelor Science with Honors Diploma in Building Venture Administration. Oxford Brookes College. Division of the Constructed of Surroundings. March 2012 Listing of Abbreviations: RC: Reinforcement Concrete TR: Turkey UK: United Kingdom USA: United States of America EU: European Union MHI: Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure EQ: Earthquake Code EE: Earthquake Engineering TSE: Turkish Customary Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS
Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Function of the analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Analysis Query …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Chapter 2: Analysis
Strategies ……………………………………………………………………………. Three Interviews……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Nose to nose interviews …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Phone Interviews ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Interview Construction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Case research ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… eight Chapter Three: Evaluation ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 Evaluation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. An efficient Code ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 Comparability with the California code………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 The replace to the Turkish Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Compliance with the
Code…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 Chapter Four: Knowledge Presentation…………………………………………………………………………… 16 Interview ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Chapter 5: Case Examine …………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Constructing
A …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Constructing B …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Constructing C …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25 Constructing D …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 SUMMARY OF CASE
STUDY ……………………………………………………………………………… 29 Chapter 6: Conclusion & Suggestions……………………………………………………….. 30 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 30 Regulation and political points: ………………………………………………………………………… 31 Suggestion: …………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Limitation of examine…………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33 Appendixes…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 38 Acknowledgements: I want to thank George Blumberg for all of the steering that he supplied me with all through the writing of this dissertation.
I’d additionally wish to thank Nejat Bayulken for serving to with my questionnaire and Luke Murgatrody and Sammuel Gracey for serving to to appropriate my grammatical errors. I want to acknowledge my classmates; Robert Leeming, Simon Yallop. Sagar Rasioni and Gianni Spagnolli , who had been at all times able to assist in any time throughout dissertation analysis. Ultimately, many thank all these at Center East Technical College, Civil Engineer Division in Ankara / Turkey who helped me carry collectively the knowledge that wanted to finish this dissertation. 1
Summary: This dissertation investigates earthquake efficiency of bolstered constructing throughout an earthquake particularly inside Turkey. The Marmara earthquake highlighted critical issues with Turkish buildings and the way they carry out throughout seismic exercise. Marmara is located on one of many worlds most lively tectonic areas. This examine centered on the standpoints of Turkish Authorities and Engineers try in building issues that they had been going through it for a few years. My analysis identifes the probem that earthquake has brought on in Turkey .
The issue that Turkish Authorities and Engineers have confronted in regard to fall down of the buildings in Marmara area. The analysis highglited that there have been three necessary query that must be answered; • • • To think about the effectiveness of constructing codes in an earthquake zone. To research why 1974 Earthquake Code was not profitable. What are new updates in current Earthquake Code? and Did Turkish authorities take lesson from it ? The analysis will deal with 4 completely different case research that had been within the earthquake area.
The case research will clarify the strategies utilized to constructions so as to perceive any issues that come up from the engineers or contractors and supplies. This will probably be achieved by amassing knowledge from Turkish Republic Catastrophe and Emergency Administration sources and Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure. The suggestions from this report are that whereas frequent points are highlighted about what authorities willingness to enhance ranges of assurance with reference to earthquake catastrophe that Turkey might have in future. Phrase Rely : 8593 Key phrases: Building Business, Earthquakes, Workmanship, Injury, Coaching, Materials High quality, in Turkey. Background This dissertation experiences an evaluation of the state of the regulatory compliance of buildings constructed within the Marmara area of Turkey. By an evaluation of previous and current practices, this examine systematically addresses the vulnerability of buildings to destruction from earthquakes. This examine focuses on the buildings within the Marmara area that had been constructed after the introduction of the 1974 constructing codes (MPWH 1998), which recognised the necessity to implement improved design, structure, and building strategies so as to stop catastrophic constructing collapse throughout earthquakes.
This code and the buildings construct after its introduction had been examined on August 17, 1999 through the Izmit earthquake (often known as the Kocaeli or Golcuk earthquake) of seven. 6 magnitude. Lots of constructing collapsed, though a big quantity survived. As well as, there have been casualties attributable to falling objects in buildings that didn’t endure catastrophic collapse. Analysis Query What’s the finest method to systematically examine the compliance of buildings constructed after the 1974 constructing code of their capacity to outlive destruction from an earthquake? 1 Function of the analysis
The principle objective of this analysis is to supply a structured method to the examine of the complicated issues related to constructing in an EQ zone. 1. To grasp the complicated technical and regulatory state of affairs across the software of an efficient constructing code to stop demise as a consequence of EQs in Turkey. 2. To assist engineers and contractors in understanding of this complicated and difficult state of affairs and to level the best way in direction of higher codes, design software and good high quality building supplies. Three. To think about different facets of the code comparable to the interior detailing and fixing movable objects to stop injury throughout and EQ.
Analysis Query • Is there a scientific strategy to think about the effectiveness of constructing codes in an earthquake zone? • • Why 1974 Earthquake Code was not profitable? What are new updates in current Earthquake Code? and Did Turkish authorities take lesson from it ? 2 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH METHODS The part presents the methodology that’s designed to deal with the analysis query and focuses on the event of a scientific examine plan to grasp the suitability of the constructing codes and whether or not builders have been compliant in building.
The examine additionally takes into consideration different developments in Turkey, such because the speedy inhabitants enhance and the necessity to construct excessive density residential constructions. The analysis methodology relies upon the group of all kinds of knowledge and data that embody political, regulatory, social, cultural, engineering and geophysics. Survived Adopted code Didn’t observe code (a) (c) Didn’t Survive (b) (d) Desk 1 accommodates the principle analysis construction adopted on this paper on buildings after the introduction of the 1974 Constructing Code that survived or didn’t survive.
The desk accommodates 4 separate instances, labeled (a), (b), (c) and (d). These will probably be mentioned and analysed on this paper. The strategy adopted on this dissertation will probably be the way to analyise the 4 instances proven in Desk 1. On this desk, the 4 instances are: (a) these buildings who’s builders claimed to have adopted Code and survived, (b) these buildings who’s builders claimed to have adopted code, however collapsed, (c) those that didn’t observe the code, however survived (comparable to historic buildings) and (d) those that didn’t observe code and had been destroyed. This issertation is designed to supply a structured method to the analytical and qualitative examine (Glazier Jack D & Powell 1992) of earthquake resilience. Moreover, qualitative methodology is the best way to totally assess earthquake vulnerability and includes many experiments and examine of a big scale that’s already being performed. Nevertheless, for the needs of this examine, visible inspection of buildings preserved in pictures are analysed to grasp their situation and be taught Three one thing of their survival standing. Observations of this kind it direct and helpful, nonetheless topic to errors (Murakami et al. , 1999).
Desk 2 accommodates a comparability of quantitative and qualitative approaches and the way the examine reported right here is an try and survey these approaches and give you an summary that may assist to higher perceive the actual state of affairs affecting the resilience of buildings within the Marmara area to earthquakes. Quantitative Purpose Relationship Between Researcher & Topic Scope of Findings Relationship Between Principle and Analysis Nature of Knowledge Exhausting & Dependable Wealthy and Deep Numeric Evaluating Idiographic Improvement Reality Distant Discovering primarily based on proof Qualitative Perspective primarily based on concepts and measurements Shut
Desk 2 Variations Between Quantitative Analysis and Qualitative Analysis. Desk 2 reveals the variations between analysis strategies, I’ve adopted the quantitative methodology, as it is a extra acceptable route for the info I’m amassing, as it’s a fact-based examine. Through the use of quantitative exploratory analysis, I will probably be extra into points and issues. This enabled me to grasp; 1. To research what is going on. 2. To ask query and interviews with professionals. Three. To create concepts and concept for future examine. Four Interviews Nose to nose interviews
The interviews had been performed so as to get a greater understanding of the explanation why some buildings survived the EQ and others didn’t. Nose to nose interviews have a definite benefit of enabling the researcher to realize perception into state of affairs the place there’s a lack of printed info or the authorities could also be hiding one thing. These interviews produce highest response within the analysis and it’ll additionally enable the researcher to grasp spectacular solutions and when acceptable. Regardless of their expense, they supply invaluable perception into a fancy political and technical space.
The principle goal of the interviews was to realize perception into the 4 (Four) instances of buildings as first described in Desk 1. Was the Code adopted? Did the constructing carry out? Was the Code efficient? That is very variable and can be utilized to gather appreciable quantities of knowledge. Throughout private interview, any kind of questionnaire can be utilized. Private interviews took two types: deliberate and unplanned. Unplanned interviews someday yield shocking outcomes as they typically catch the particular person off guard and so they reveal one thing fascinating or beforehand hidden.
Throughout my analysis interval, I’ve achieved each because it helped me to grasp the subject higher, and in addition to succeed in educated individuals and achieve perception. Throughout my analysis interval, interview with Nejat Basulke passed off on 14th January 2012; he’s president of chamber of Civil Engineers. Phone Interviews Phone interviews are much less time consuming and cheaper and it additionally offers the chance to entry to anybody who has phone. 1. 1. It may be extra versatile as interviewer can clarify questions not understood by the respondent.
Relying on respondent’s reply they’ll skip some questions and probe extra on others. 5 2. Three. Permits higher pattern management. Response fee be prone to be greater than mail. 6 Interview Construction The questions had been primarily primarily based upon George Blumberg’s options on constructing efficiency and supplies. The questions had been designed and formatted in such a approach that the respondent may current their full view concerning the matter. Detailed questions and authentic solutions could be discovered on the finish of this dissertation within the appendix part. 1. What’s your definition of Earthquake Engineering?
This query is essential, as it’ll present that respondent really believes is Earthquake Engineering and this can then decide how the next questions will probably be answered and the way a lot emphasis could be put onto their outcomes. 2. What are principal failures that buildings are collapsing? That is query that may determine the principle issues of the buildings and what trigger them to break down. Three. Why there have been so many challenge errors? How approves them? Didn’t they think about the Earthquake Code. Following swiftly on from the earlier query is a query designed to make the responder give his personal opinion. . A lot of the buildings are constructed on bolstered system, was it true ? i Particularly f the nation on laying on the seismic areas . By asking this query, it’ll imply to be fairly a probing query to get the responder to consider the failings encountered and try to purpose why these failings occurred. 5. How is the poor workmanship impacts the buildings? This is essential query because of the lack of know-how in my analysis. 6. What the suggestions, so as to construct earthquake resistance constructing, in addition to following the earthquake code?
It is a good begin from which to recommend enhancements evaluate and it ought to present a very good begin from which suggests enhancements and this might determine new enhancements that haven’t been researched or improved. Due to this fact this 7 query may find yourself being probably the most obligatory a part of the analysis the options may assist to make it higher. Case research Our selection of case research was made so as to discover the weather of the buildings that have the 1999 EQ as proven in Desk 1 the place buildings that each survived and didn’t survive are studied.
The identical info was derived from every case examine. These standards are: did they observe the code, what was making failure (or survival), compliance to the code 1974. Case research are primarily used when the researcher be decided to maintain up my argument by an in depth evaluation of the challenge “ Strengthened Concrete Constructing in Golcuk” which constructed beneath Code 1974. The character of the case examine focuses on one side, in my case examine, this might be, why bolstered concrete buildings are simple goal in earthquake. In accordance with S. G.
Naoum (2007) there are three varieties of case research (Desk Four). The Descriptive Case Examine Fairly much like the idea of descriptive survey “ counting” The analytical Case Examine Much like concept of investigative survey “Counting, and Affiliation “ The Explanatory Case Utilizing the theoretical method to the issues and evaluating them. Desk Three The Case Examine Strategy to addressing the analysis query. The case examine is most helpful for producing concept and the principle benefit of a case examine is that it offers me a chance to review one section of the issue intimately from many various viewpoints. CHAPTER Three: ANALYSIS ANALYSIS The evaluation on this part relies on the knowledge gathered through the experimental levels utilizing the tactic described within the earlier part. For the reason that aims of the analysis reported on this dissertation are designed to supply a greater understanding of the effectiveness of constructing codes in a Turkish earthquake zone, the then evaluation is introduced so as to uncover the way to higher conduct a examine into the small print of code compliance.
A abstract of this may be seen in Determine 1, the place the resilience of a constructing in an EQ zone will depend on the effectiveness of the code and on how nicely it has been utilized to the development. An Efficient Code Compliance with the Code and the resialiance to Determine 1 reveals the relation between an efficient constructing code injury as a consequence of EQs This benefit of learning the state of affairs in Turkey is that the frequency and depth of earthquakes, coupled with excessive inhabitants density, results in a state of affairs the place buildings are examined to the intense.
An efficient Code Within the absence of efficient advance warning of earthquakes the one measure that may be taken to guard occupants of buildings is to assemble them utilizing supplies and with a design that’s resistant to break as a consequence of earthquake motion. Constructing EQ resistant buildings is a nicely develop observe and in sure locations the place these buildings are required, there are only a few casualties from collapsed buildings. As an illustration within the Los Angeles EQ of 1994 resulted in solely 20 deaths regardless of the dimensions of the quake (BBC Information 1994).
This is because of an efficient constructing code that’s adhered to by everyone who builds. Moreover, there are measures within the Code to stop falling objects from coming unfastened and placing individuals throughout an EQ. The foremost purpose for the injury in bolstered concrete constructions is as a result of, they don’t seem to be absolutely designed for seismic motion, and due to this fact bolstered concrete buildings can’t sow spongy behaviour in earthquake. Nicely-designed 9 constructions must be able to resisting motions equally from three instructions of earthquake results.
The damages in bolstered buildings have occurred as a consequence of design and building strategies, comparable to use of poor resistant’s concrete, the weak reinforcement of soppy tales and beam joints. The damages in unreinforced constructing shouldn’t be a shocking, as it’s not obeyed the development guidelines and new up to date Earthquake Code. On this dissertation, the oberservations and my findings on the damages bolstered concrete and different kind of constructing have been assessed, so as to perceive the issues, Turkish Earthquake Codes (2007) directed in direction of design have been mentioned particularly for constructing.
Comparability with the California code Revisions to the observe of earthquake codes in building engineering in Turkey have normally adopted main, detrimental earthquakes. This development shouldn’t be distinctive to Turkey as a result of modifications in design observe in Japan, Mexico, and the USA have adopted main earthquakes in these nations (Nisee 2010). Provisions for specific detailing of bolstered concrete moment-resisting frames for yielding response had been launched in Turkey in early 1975s.
These necessities had been significantly much like these launched in the USA within the early 1970s (Nisee 2010). Then again, the development of buildings with ductile particulars was not licensed because it was in California within the 1970s. To a sure extent, buildings might be constructed with out particular particulars for ductile response or ductile particulars. In accordance with Nisee (2010) report “ For contemporary bolstered concrete moment-resisting frames of excessive ductility (U. S California Code. , the ordinates of the 1997 Turkish lateral-force-coefficient spectra exceed these of the 1997 California Code for each rock and agency soil websites. Recognizing that the prescriptive particulars of the 1997 California Code and the 1997 Turkish code for frames of excessive 10 ductility are related, the efficiency of buildings designed to both code must be related if the requirements of building are comparable”. Lateral Power – Resisting System Strengthened concrete shear wall Strengthened body Metal braced body Metal resisting body 6 6 7 6. 5 concrete moment-resisting 1974 to 1999 Turkey 6 7 1974 to 1999 USA 7 7. Desk Four Evaluating of two completely different seismic codes, (Nisee 2010) In accordance with Desk Four, the critiques of two completely different codes carry the thought of the similarities in most different regards. Though the codes are very related with one another, the buildings are ought to have designed and constructed in accordance with these codes, it should have carried out equally, if the development high quality is the same. Due to this fact, a lot of the collapsed multi-storey buildings had been believed to be extremely earthquake resistant. They weren’t for some or the entire following causes: 1.
A lot of the buildings didn’t meet the design necessities of the code and included particulars that aren’t earthquake resistant, as a consequence of insufficient vertical and horizontal reinforcing metal and the widespread use of easy reinforcing metal. 2. The design structural engineer, the contractor, doesn’t examine the continued building to confirm that the contractor has constructed the constructing in response to the intent of the Earthquake Code necessities. Three. Four. 5. Most of the buildings had been constructed with very poor and inappropriate building supplies and utilized poor workmanship.
A lot of the constructions had been knowingly allowed to be constructed on lively faults. Many buildings weren’t engineered, however constructed in response to previous expertise with 1974 code. 11 In accordance with my analysis, I’ve discovered the principle purpose between California Code and Turkish Code. This as a result of, it was cheaper to assemble stronger buildings with out particular particulars for ductile response than weaker buildings with ductile detailing, non ductile moment-resisting body building was commonest in Turkey as much as the time of the Izmit earthquake (Nisee 2010).
Since 1974, California has made a big course of in direction of earthquake security for the constructions. California Code grew to become extra helpful and made California state safer from probably deactivating earthquakes. These new insurance policies that has the next fundamental rules; 1. 2. Continuous enchancment in training and new abilities about earthquakes and higher strategies for mitigating their results. Evolutionary enchancment in public coverage affecting the design and building that may match California’s constructed surroundings. The replace to the Turkish Code Earthquake code of Turkey is ready round 3 times, 1959, 1975, 2007.
This earthquake code consists of laws for normal rules of earthquakes. Comparable to specs is to keep away from structural and non-structural parts of constructing from any injury in low-intensity earthquakes; to restrict the injury in structural and non-structural parts to repairable ranges in medium-intensity earthquakes, and to stop the general or partial collapse of buildings in high- depth earthquakes so as to keep away from the lack of life (MPWS 1998)). Marmara Earthquake in 1999, a lot of the contractors are didn’t observe earthquake codes, so this esulted errors in (Europan Journal of Academic Research 2(1), 2010); • Low high quality concrete is utilized in 90% • Corrosion downside in 64. 20% • Sea sand (with salt) is utilized in 61. 23% • Service life ends in 16% 12 • Dangerous concrete curing in 11. 27% • Varied architectural errors in 12% • Soil issues in 23. 40% In 1997, the federal government tried to replace the Earthquake for the brand new and present constructions, to supply a little bit safety from the collapse. Between 1997 to 1999, lower than 25 % of all buildings in Turkey conform to the replace in Earthquake Code in 1997 (Coburn 1995:84).
Final earthquake code covers the laws about repairing and reinforcement of present buildings. The final objective of earthquake resistant design with this new specification is to keep away from structural and non-structural parts of buildings from any injury in low-intensity earthquakes; to restrict the injury in structural and non-structural parts to keep away from the general or partial collapse of buildings in high- depth earthquakes so as to keep away from the lack of life. 2007 TEC consists of following titles (Turkish Earthquake Code, 2007, MPWH 1998).
These new updates are primarily based on Desk 5; Earthquake Resistant Design guidelines for Strengthened Concrete Constructions Earthquake Resistant Design guidelines for Masonry Constructions. Earthquake Resistant Design guidelines for Metal Constructions Eartquake Resistant Design on Reinforcement of Present Earthquake Resistant Design guidelines for Foundations. Reinforcement of Constructions. Web site Feasibility Work. Materials Picks. Desk 5 New Updates on Earthquake Code 2007. 13 Compliance with the Code What had been the issues with public data? Throughout my analysis, I discovered no proof of inspections that has been achieved.
Usually, the nations, who do observe their Earthquake Code, the municipalities are liable for supervising constructing building tasks. Nevertheless in Turkey, this works up aspect down, this primarily as a result of most of them have insufficient abilities and sources to satisfy this accountability. In accordance with a concept, to having a established constructing codes and land use laws, comparable to within the U. S. A and UK, earlier than the challenge begins, the structure, structural engineer and designers should be submit their paper works for the construction that they will construct and get the approval building allow.
In consequent, most municipal planning workplaces make use of no structural engineers and stamp plans as “obtained” with out checking the technical issues of the challenge. (Gulkan, 2001; Gulkan, 2002) Native governments are permitted to close down building websites if these plans don’t meet their laws, however issues are extra usually met with an institutional “averting of eyes”. (Gulkan, 2002) Moreover, municipalities should not responsible for errors in improvement, and no authorized motion in opposition to officers has ever been taken. Balamir, 2001; Gulkan, 2002). Lack of training on the dangers of EQ : The analysis has proven me some necessary challenge with lack of training on the dangers of EQ. Most of Turkish graduates, as quickly as they achieved their diploma (diploma), have the authority, in response to Turkish Regulation to do any kind of tasks, and to be any kind of challenge supervisor on any building. Aydinoglu (1998) ‘cease my pal, to be a challenge engineer shouldn’t be such a straightforward job, you have to be wellversed in earthquake engineering and building know-how, and have your work assessed’.
Polat Gulkan (2000) Ankara Technical College/ Turkey spoken the issue when it comes to the protection afforded the sick coordinated “professional” at the price of public security; “In Turkey any engineer who holds a present diploma, with out regard for the (theoretical) diploma of problem of the challenge, can put his/her signature to any challenge. Knowledgeable standing in engineering has not been established. This in impact equips engineers and different consultants, like [government] officers, with 14 an iron-plated immunity “. (Gulkan, 2001). Expertise is among the necessary want for earthquake engineering.
There are numerous architects or civil engineers utilized to work in Consulting and Inspection Bureau (CCE) . In accordance with The top of the Istanbul CCE, Cemal Gokce, said ‘However I do know that the majority of those colleagues of mine have by no means drafted a challenge of their lives. They need to not give permission to those individuals to open a bureau simply because they’re politically near the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (quoted in TDN, 29 October 1999). The political state of affairs and the issue of doing enterprise: Till late 2000’s, If you realize some one in parliaments, it was very easy to arrange a building firm and constructed.
This was as a consequence of political energy behind the proprietor or the contractor. Due to this fact, a lot of the guidelines weren’t making use of to them. In august 20th, 1998,the general public prosecutor for the Ankara State Safety Court docket launched an investigation so as to discover out the allege corruption in state tenders for housing contractors for Marmara EQ. The Minister for Public Works and Housing and his father created an organization promoting building tools and, it was alleged, pressured firms submitting building tenders for the constructing of everlasting housing for earthquake survivors to purchase supplies from this firm.
A lot of the supplies weren’t even authorised by TSE and in addition really useful by the Earthquake Code. This implies, as a consequence of political energy, individuals weren’t capable of examine whether or not constructing is in-built earthquake space, both momentary or everlasting, as they may not discover any plans or permissions. The voice from the professions is united: ‘We knew that this fault runs by way of this space. There have been many previous earthquakes on this space with the final one 1999 in Goluck. So that is very apparent.
Geologically we all know that the realm has such a threat, however the final result reveals that the event was completely unplanned’ (Haluk Suguoglu, Director of Earthquake Engineering Analysis Centre, METU). 15 CHAPTER Four: DATA PRESENTATION INTERVIEW Who’s Nejat Bayulke : Nejat Bayulke graduated from METU with a Bachelor of Civil Engineering. He has labored on the Earthquake Analysis Division for the Ministry of Public Works since 1998. He’s presently a number one member of the Chamber of Civil Engineers in Turkey. The interview was in Turkish after which translated on my own “Korkut Mirzai”.
Unique speech could be present in Appendix. 1) What’s your definition of Earthquake Engineering? There have been two responses to this query; the primary reply given centered across the analysis of Earthquake Engineering could be outlined as department of engineering devoted to earthquake hazards. In his opinion earthquake engineering covers and investigates the issues, then brings one of the best answer for these issues, that are attributable to the seismic actions. Second clarification was that earthquake engineering is the preventative measures taking in designing a constructing to resist earth tremors and seismic actions.
These measures might not stop constructing injury however ought to make sure the integrity of the constructing stays in order that collapse doesn’t happen within the occasion of such pure disasters. Abstract: Though earthquake engineers are fairly wanted for building, in Turkey, this isn’t actually frequent. A lot of the buildings should not seen by these engineers so as to get approve of building stage. In accordance with up to date Earthquake Code 2007, any building in earthquake zone should have one inspection by an earthquake engineer through the building phrase. ) Why does a construction collapse? There is likely to be an error within the challenge, or a flaw within the building; it is likely to be due to the outside components. Then again, constructions collapse as a consequence of horizontal hundreds and pressures, which weaken their supporting supplies. Abstract: Main downside with construction in Turkey, particularly with bolstered 16 concrete, they don’t seem to be really designed for seismic area, when there’s a earthquake, beams within the constructing can’t carry the horizontal hundreds, as they change into weakened due to the shake. Three) What are the foremost Venture Errors? Errors could be made with the load, it might need been calculated lower than it ought to have been, flawed nook cuts and the tools is likely to be insufficient to assist the load, perhaps the supporting system shouldn’t be accurately or calculation and modeling strategies could also be inadequate. There is likely to be some penalties of the geometry of the construction however these could also be missed throughout calculation. It is a explanation for destruction. For instance, hundreds are miscalculated or perhaps the potential of an earthquake is uncared for. These are challenge errors.
Some results should not considered, comparable to rotational and shear forces. As an illustration, a much more necessary matter: the strain attributable to twisting in heat climates. These don’t seem immediately however in time these form of results result in sure damages, fractures within the construction. Abstract: When I’m examined the buildings, I’ve clearly observed, most the buildings have the structural design errors. Particularly the one designed with Earthquake Code 1975. My understanding from this query is, the foremost error within the bolstered concrete constructing is flawed planning and selections.
Comparable to comfortable floor ground, the place the primary ground of the constructing is approach a lot greater than floor ground, and construction cant not carry the load through the earthquake. Sadly this resolution made by engineers or contractors so as to make extra revenue. The principle downside is making certain that contractors observe the designs that strengthen buildings and never reduce any corners for the sake of additional revenue. Common inspections must be carried out through the building course of by a authorities managed physique in addition to the procurement crew. Four) Building Errors? Right here in our nation the largest mistake in building is the truth that the concrete used within the challenge doesn’t have sufficient resistance. This, sadly, is a grave downside of our nation. It was an even bigger downside particularly within the days after we didn’t have prepared combined concrete. So far as I do know plenty of buildings’ concrete 17 resistance decreases right down to 1/Three of the resistance required in that challenge. The tools is insufficient, misplaced. These, too, are the explanations of the collapses. 5) Why a lot of the bolstered buildings are collapsed through the earthquake?
Earlier than continuing to the reason in addition to the evaluation of the thought of, bolstered concrete buildings, it appears essential to first give and describe its principal options. To start with, in Turkey, owing to the poor workmanship in design and software and the low high quality of supplies, bolstered concrete buildings are typically affected, broken by earthquakes. Then, the present power of the concrete of the complemented construction is estimated at 100 kg/cm2; nonetheless, when earthquakes happen and buildings crumble, this worth can plummet to 60-70 kg/cm2.
It’s to be reminded that, in concept the design power of concrete is valued at 160 kg/cm2 (dice power). From the above, it may be inferred that in Turkey, most buildings don’t respect the established “earthquake resistant design code”. Anchorage lengths, longitudinal bars, shut spacing are illustrations of guidelines hardly ever thought-about and utilized in at this time’s building. Inside the context of earthquakes, it’s noticeable that, when it comes to conceptual design, only a few are the buildings supplied with an earthquake resistant structural system with a correct body or a frame-shear wall system.
To sum up, because of the above talked about causes, in Turkey, most bolstered concrete buildings are uncovered to earthquakes. Abstract : My understanding from this query could be almost a lot of the bolstered concrete buildings are collapsed through the earthquake. Therefore The entire collapsed buildings have slab system of joist beams with hole light-weight concrete block fillers, which utterly completely different than present necessities of Earthquake Code (Earthquake Code 2007) 6) How are you going to describe the poor workmanship?
In Turkey, a lot of the building issues are primarily based on poor workmanship, this primarily as a consequence of contractors prefers to both use low cost supplies or flawed methodology of 18 building. This poor workmanship could be underline in two other ways, one in every of them is the connections of columns and beams are actually weak, because the connection of metal bars didn’t connect it appropriately. An different issue is the granulometry (Definition: Linking to the distribution of grain sizes in sand or rock) of the sand and gravels of concrete had been significantly poor.
So these massive gravels blocked the stable whereas casting at web site the place metal connections had been thick because it resulted in very poor and weak connections. So such connections creates a heavy damages throughout earthquake. Abstract : My understanding for poor workmanship which results in faulty works must be rectified by the contractor or engineers, nonetheless, so as to do this, the challenge would require postponement of time, due to this fact individuals simply ignoring to observe that stage. Sloppy errors comparable to taking incorrect measurements from plans and specs created the development errors.
Moreover, incorrect models and measures throughout building have created a faulty work. In consequence, the contractors must reconstruct these building errors which leads to taking further time to finish the challenge moderately than simply ignoring it. 7) What the suggestions, so as to construct constructing, in addition to following the earthquake code. Suggestions could be to make buildings EQ resistant. This might be achieved utilizing the constructing methodology of tunnel formation (EQ code 2007). This may be one of the best proposal to enhance the earthquake resistance of housing.
Though, tunnel kind techniques have been utilized in Turkey since late 70`s, it didn’t change into a main selection within the building till 1999. In consequence, tunnel kind buildings carried out higher seismic efficiency by retarding plastic hinge formations on the most important areas, comparable to slab–wall connections and round wall openings than different buildings. Throughout the earthquake, tunnel kind buildings don’t accumulate all the facility at shear connections, it does divides the power all around the constructing, due to this fact chances are you’ll really feel the depth greater than the buildings, however this a very good factor.
One other good thing about tunnel kind buildings is that they by no means collapse earthquake resistance 19 successively as seen in a domino impact, they sway as a substitute. Abstract: In accordance the latest earthquakes experiences, tunnel types body buildings have exhibited higher efficiency than the opposite buildings “RC”. Since 1999, after the laws grew to become tighter, the contractors and engineers selection of utilizing the tunnel kind has change into a main. 20 CHAPTER 5: CASE STUDY BUILDING A The extent of injury is much less in Sehitler District , a lot of the buildings are settled in direction of the aspect of hills.
The soil situation is difficult and the constructing inventory is made up of 2-Three storey metal framed constructions and Three-Four storey frameless brick and masonry buildings by 49% and, Three-7 storey bolstered concrete framed buildings by 51% (Ergunay & Gulkan, 1999). Constructing A (Image 1) that I’ve chosen, it was constructed on the seismic fault line, and in addition this building kind is addressed by the codes/requirements in Turkey beneath “ 1. Rules for Buildings to Be In-built Catastrophe Areas (1998) 2.
TS 500: Necessities for Design and Building of Strengthened Concrete Constructions (2000)”. Moreover, with good feasibility analysis, constructing has constructed on a math basis, so it might probably transmit the gravity hundreds to the soil any vibration from the bottom. Image 1 The Case Examine, Constructing B Sehitler Discrit, (H. Sezen2000) 21 This constructing has an entire load path for seismic motion results from any parallel route that transfers inertial forces from the constructing to basis.
The vertical load bearing components are nicely hooked up to the foundations; due to this fact concrete columns and partitions are getting supportive power from the inspiration (Image 2). Image 2 The Case Examine, Constructing B Sehitler Discrit , Basis Degree, (H. Sezen2000) The partitions are the primarily load carried for the buildings and one of the vital efficient members in opposition to earthquakes. Good planed of wall density helped in lowering the unit shear, and enabled a lot of the elastic response through the sturdy earthquake interval (Image Three). Most the supplies sed on this construction building had been thought-about to be nicely ample per the requirement from the Turkish Nationwide Building Code and Requirements. “ Laws was enacted in April 2000 to implement necessary design checking and building inspection of all buildings by government-licensed non-public supervision corporations. For brand new buildings, this supervision goals to make sure compliance with earthquake-resistant design codes and nominal building high quality requirements’’ (Republic of Turkey Ministry of Nationwide Training 2003). 22
Image Three The Case Examine, Constructing B Sehitler Discrit , Elevation, (H. Sezen2000). BUILDING B Constructing B (Image Four) is positioned in northern aspect of Golcuk, close to by the coast line , this an instance constructing of who adopted the Earthquake Code 1974 , however collapsed in 1999 EQ in Marmara. Because the constructing in-built round 1975, it was fairly previous for Turkish constructing classification. . This constructing suffered with the little injury on account of the seismic motion however couldn’t be occupied as a result of it settled as a consequence of liquefaction and bearing failure of the supporting soils (Image 5).
As a result of, the place the constructing has been construct is a concrete stuffed floor ( the place it was a sea ), after a few years, the ocean water began to cracking the concrete and allowed liquefaction. Due to this fact, unlikely of any floor motion, constructing had been able to collapse or damages. Till late 2000s, liquefaction was not thought-about by the Earthquake Code (MPWH 1998). To attain efficiency 23 partially stabilized the constructing. Three. 7. Four Constructing D Three. 7. Four. 1 Constructing Description Constructing D was a six-story moment-frame constructing positioned within the heart of Adapazari.
An elevation of the constructing is proven in Determine improvementson similarliquefaction would have age in past collapse prevention, web site Three-59. Primarily based to keep away from building of the identical Adapazari, the inspiration for Constructing D was in all probability a mat or raft with a thickness of roughly been required. 1 m. or soil and basis conduct in performance-based earthqu ng would have happy the efficiency stage of collapse pre 1997] and Imaginative and prescient 2000 [SEAOC 1995]), it might not have s life-safety efficiency stage. To attain efficiency beyon Determine Three-59 Elevation of Constructing D o keep away from liquefaction would have been required.
Image Four The Case Examine, Constructing B North,Golcuk , Elevation, (H. Sezen2000). Three. 7. Four. 2 System Response Constructing D is an instance of poor system efficiency that was not accompanied by componen injury or failure. This constructing suffered little injury on account of the earthquake shaking however couldn’t be occupied as a result of it settled greater than 1 m as a consequence of liquefaction and bearing failure of the supporting soils (see Determine Three-60). It’s seemingly that this failure of the supporting soils restricted the shaking skilled by the constructing. Companies and utilities to the constructing had been destroyed and ingress and egress had been most tough.
The poor efficiency of this constructing underscores the necessity to ure Three-60 Settlement of Constructing D as a consequence of liquefaction and soil-bearing Image 5 The Case Examine, Constructing B North,Golcuk , Settlement of Constructing B, as a consequence of liquefaction, (H. Sezen2000). ary Remarks e of the dialogue of chosen buildings is to determine points re ust be addressed within the improvement of pointers and instruments f ed earthquake engineering. of this writing, constructing (system) response is commonly judged on mponent within the constructing. Clearly, this method, though con fective.
Poor conduct of 1 or two random parts doe avior, though poor conduct of 1 or two key parts m sms for redistribution of gravity hundreds don’t exist in a buildi ns to be discovered concerning the collapse of buildings and the desig n or failure. Analysis on the next subjects is required to im 24 BUILDING C Most of the metropolis’s well-known historic monuments comparable to Hagia Sophia (Image 6) might face up to the quake as a result of they had been designed by earthquake conscious architects and engineers, constructed soundly of high quality supplies, and, have already survived from a number of substantial earthquakes for over thousand years.
In lots of instances, reinforcements have been added when injury from earlier quakes has been repaired. The rationale why this constructing didn’t collapse, though they didn’t even have earthquake code by that point ,the superior a part of the construction shouldn’t be a field, it’s a collection of domes. Domes ship lateral forces very nicely for 3 causes. 1. First, and first, even earthquake sturdy sufficient to get a dome to sway won’t produce areas of the construction that haven’t any assist in opposition to gravity, as a result of the bottom is way wider than the highest. 2.
Second, domes distribute forces in all instructions naturally, and as a consequence the design is significantly better at dissipating power. Three. Third, a lot of the mass of a dome is low, and this decrease heart of gravity vastly reduces the prospect of collapse. Hagia Sophia began displaying indicators of fatigue and was extensively strengthened with the addition of structural helps to its exterior by the nice Ottoman architect Sinan who can also be thought-about one of many first earthquake engineers on this planet. Image 6 The Case Examine, Constructing C Istanbul , Elevation Of Hagia Sofia 25
BUILDING D Constructing D ( Image 7) is positioned in Kavakli district close to by the town heart alongside the seacoast the place a lot of the bolstered concrete framed buildings are dominant roughly 75% and floor bearing capability is low poor soil situation, due to this fact greater than 60 % buildings had been closely broken or reasonably broken (Ergunay & Gulkan, 1999). Image 7 The Case Examine, Constructing D Kavakli Discrit , Again Elevation (H. Sezen2000) Strengthened concrete techniques are well-known to be probably the most delicate techniques to earthquake hundreds, except if they’re constructed with acceptable Earthquake Code requirements, building strategies and good workmanship.
But, on this area, a lot of the above necessities that weren’t happy have change into the explanations for top injury on bolstered concrete buildings. The “ cement “ that used on flooring, was fabricated from sea sand, due to this fact it didn’t really had a enough of cement. Nevertheless, in response to new Earthquake Code 2007 clearly states that concrete high quality should be c20 or greater high quality, if it primarily based in 26 zone one and two(MPWH 1998). Though, at this constructing, this stage was even decrease than c10 stage. Utilizing of low high quality of cement made constructing columns weak in opposition to earthquakes.
The cracks on the columns and beams let it to be damaged as a consequence of heavy load and seismic vibration (Image eight). Image eight The Case Examine, Constructing D Kavakli Discrit , Column,(H. Sezen2000) On the first ground columns, on the entrance face of the constructing Image 9. Additional broken could be discovered across the stairwell on the rear of the construction. The staircases at the back of the stairwell had been solid integrally with the exterior columns. Every touchdown is positioned nearly 1 m under the beam-column connections.
As could be seen on the Image 9, Though Earthquake Code requires sturdy high quality of metal within the stairs , there have been no sufficient quantity of metal body used within the connections. So, which means staircases resulted in brief column building and led to shear failures on the landings (MPWH 1998). 27 Image 9 The Case Examine, Constructing D Kavakli Discrit , Stairs Degree,(H. Sezen2000) 28 SUMMARY OF CASE STUDY To sum up the case examine, I’ve thought-about, that a lot of the residential buildings that collapsed together with constructing A had been constructed to the earlier code which was established 1975.
D`Ayala (2003) states the earthquakes injury on this catastrophe have put the obligation for the deconstruction on poor requirements of building; • • • Provisions of the code for detailing the reinforcement was not current in observe. Concrete was significantly poor high quality contributing to brittle efficiency. Residence blocks had infill wall made with mild weight of metal body, that will not be ample to withstand the forces. Earthquake cataclysm is a serious downside that Turkish authorities have needed to cope with over time.
Though, Turkish authorities failed to enhance understanding of the earthquake catastrophe and emergency options (Gulkan 2001); • • Lack of correctly certified workers within the council to manage the design checks. Lack of newbie producers, who had been finishing up the design checks. 29 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSIONS This part supplies the steering for conducting an efficient evaluation of the compliance to the constructing code in Turkey and to make suggestion on the way to develop an efficient and secure constructed surroundings.
The purpose of the analysis is to determine the issues for implementation of bolstered constructing behaviours as a consequence of Earthquake Code failure in earthquake. The literatures had been containing info’s that Turkey has the one of many actively seismic zone, analysis of the supplies, choice of building strategies, lack of training, earthquake code and case examine. For that purpose, this examine went on examine in depth. Interviews had been taken, so as to assist the case examine with skilled references.
Case research confirmed that there have been many inadequate strategies, and these proof authorised that there was a poor understanding concerning the supplies and making use of them as a consequence of lack poor coaching and training and never following the laws “ Earthquake Code”. These researched defined that the techniques and strategies didn’t even absolutely match with EU laws. There was no correct seismic requirement within the Turkish Earthquake Codes till after the massive earthquake 1999 Marmara Earthquake.
Though, there have been many revisions to the code from 1944 to 1975, however they weren’t fairly helpful for the numerous issues with Turkish building. Though the 1999 Marmara Earthquake was a necessary wake-up name, Turkey has massive inventories of buildings which are vulnerable to extreme injury and collapse from sturdy earthquakes. 1000’s of buildings collapsed all around the area. Many buildings had been designed to outdated constructing codes (Code 1975) or none in any respect. Most of those buildings and far of the development all through Turkey consists of no nonetheless body work with unreinforced masonry infill partitions. This dissertation broadly defined that Turkish Authorities laws has failed to scale back the danger of great hurt. Use of thick slabs resulted in sturdy column and this weak beam may assist it. Structural system issues comparable to comfortable 30 storey colon in floor ground, and flawed beam connection are necessary components. If the up to date Earthquake Code is utilized, the injury causes ensuing significantly much less. Though, the foremost downside in Turkey is that the workmanship and supplies are of poor high quality.
With a view to obtain a very good normal of building, the proposal could be to make use of acceptable materials and use of tunnel kind concrete will scale back the danger of the injury in any future earthquakes (Earthquake Code 2007). Yr 2012, it grieves me to say that Turkey hasn’t progressed greater than an inch since 1999. Van earthquake in 2011 was one of the best instance for this. The exact time and place of an earthquake can’t be predicted, however in response to seismologist , they’re anticipating an enormous earthquake in Istanbul / Marmara , there nonetheless extra to develop in Earthquake Code and in building.
REGULATION AND POLITICAL ISSUES: • Administrative failure has recognized that Ministry for Public Works and Housing said the development examine legislation after publishing that an necessary purpose the injury had occurred was as a result of the native administrations didn’t carried out their inspection duties appropriately by that point (Earthquake Code2007, MPWH 1998). • • Politic points play a serious function in efficiency of any materials in Turkey. The analysis demoed that Turkish building system politically pushed. RECOMMENDATION: Suggestions are to not be anticipated that change the situation of housing and building in Turkey in a single day. Bettering the development high quality by offering of excellent mixing and amount of water, good class sand and aggregates, designed amount of cement within the combine, acceptable mixing of all the weather with management on water cement enough compaction within the place of concrete, correct placement of metal ( Earthquake Code 2007, MPWH 1998). • Keep away from comfortable storey floor ground (Earthquake Code 2007, MPWH 1998). 31 • Design metal construction should be ductile (Earthquake Code2007, MPWH 1998). • Up to date Earthquake Code should be making use of to all constructions (Earthquake Code2007, MPWH 1998). The engineer or web site supervisor answerable for the development should personally be on the web site in any respect time and supervise all of the operators so as examine the fabric and check them if it obligatory (Earthquake Code2007, MPWH 1998). • With a view to cease constructing collapsing, this could will depend on the federal government making deeper modifications to its governmental system, institutionalising group participation in catastrophe administration, and should give precedence to those modifications, earlier than it’s too late (Earthquake Code2007, MPWH 1998). •
The federal government ought to arrange a functionality committee to evaluate the supplies and tasks. This committee ought to embody high quality of supplies, construction of the constructing, location of the location and related planning insurance policies. LIMITATION OF STUDY • The primary limitation I’ve in scripting this dissertation is that I’ve the phrase restrict of 10,000; this in actual fact limits total what I can embody in my sources examine (literature). Any further info that proves to be related to my examine will probably be included and referenced to my appendix. As a result of nature of the knowledge I used to be looking for from my sources, authorities officers weren’t assured in giving out info that might be seen as reputably detrimental. • Because of my matter primarily primarily based about Turkey and Turkish building and authorities laws, it has been tough to retrieve info and a few paperwork’s, because it was crucial for my high quality of analysis and in addition there have been massive numbers of articles, journals and literatures, it was significantly tough to abstract them and slim it down. 32
REFERENCES AYDINOGLU, N. (1998), ‘Deprem ulkesi Turkiyenin ilkel inaat duzeni’, Insaat muhendislik haberi ‘396/Four. AIJ, (2000). Report on the Injury Investigation of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey: Structure Insti- tute of Japan, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Anderson, Donald et. al. (2001). “The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey) Earthquake – Injury to Constructions” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28, 715-737. Akcay, Burcu. (2004). “Variation of In-Place Concrete Core Power in
Constructions from Istanbul Space: Statistical Evaluation of Concrete Core Knowledge” Journal of Supplies in Civil Engineering, ASCE. AIJ, (2000). Report on the Injury Investigation of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey: Structure Insti- tute of Japan, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Alarcon, Dr. John and Franco, Dr. Guillermo. (Aug. 11, 2009). “Izmit-D? zce Ten ” AIRWorldwide rd , (Accesed on Three December 2011 ). Bibbee, A. , Gonenc, R. , Jacobs, S. , Konvitz, J. , & Value, R. , (2000). “Financial Results of the 1999 Turkish Earthquakes: An Interim Report (247)”.
Paris: Group for Financial Co-operation and Improvement. 33 BBC Information 1994 “ Los Angeles Earthquake” obtainable at http://information. bbc. co. uk/onthisday/hello/dates/tales/january/17/newsid ( Accessed 15th March 2012). COBURN, A. W. and SPENCE, R. J. S. (1992), “Earthquake Prevention”. London: John Wiley and Sons. Don. W Stacks. “Primer of Public Relations Analysis Gulferd” press. 2002. Dogangun A. , “Efficiency of bolstered concrete buildings through the Could 1, 2003 Bingol Earthquake in Turkey” Engineering Constructions 26 (2004) 841–856.
D’yala (2003) “ Earthquake Catastrophe and Earthquake Code”. EEFIT (1999), ‘Report on Kocaeli Earthquake of August 1999’, London. EEFIT (2000), ‘Report on Kocaeli Earthquake of August 1999’, London. EERI (1999), ‘The Izmit (Kocaeli) Turkey Earthquake’, obtainable on-line at: http//:www. eeri. org/earthquakes/Reconn ( Accessed 12th November 2012). EQE (1999), ‘Izmit, Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999 (M 7. Four): An EQE Briefing’, obtainable on-line at: http//www. eqe. com/revamp/izmitrepor (Accessed 12th November 2011).
Earthquake Engineering Analysis Institute (EERI) (1999): “The Izmit (Kocaeli) Turkey earthquake”. www. eeri. org/earthquakes/Reconn/Turkey0899 (Accessed 12th November 2011). 34 Dr. S. G. Naoum(2007)’Dissertation Analysis & Writing for Building’ , Case Examine. Derya (2004), ‘Put up-earthquake Injury Evaluation Utilizing Satellite tv for pc and Aerial Video Imagery’. GULKAN, P. (2001), ‘An Essay on the Cancellation of Constructing Inspection Decree with Power of Regulation 595 and the Subsequent Constructing Inspection Regulation 4708’, GULKAN, P. and ERGUNAY, O. (1999), ‘Case Examine’ in J. Ingleton (ed. Pure Catastrophe Administration. A Presentation to Commemorate the Worldwide Decade for Pure Catastrophe Discount (IDNDR) 1990-2000. Leicester: Tudor Rose: 176. Gulkan, P. and A. Yakut. “Tunnel Type Constructing”. World Housing Encyclopedia. Earthquake Engineering Analysis Institute and Worldwide Affiliation for Earthquake Engineering, Turkey/Report 101, 2003. Gulkan, Polat (2000). “Constructing code enforcement prospects: failure of public coverage”. Earthquake Spectra 16 Supp A (December), Chapter 15 of 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake Reconnaissance report.
Glazier, Jack D, & Powell, Ronald R (Eds), (1992) “Qualitative researches in info administration”, Englewood Co. Libraries Limitless . Hanifi Binici (2006). “The earthquakes and the damages attributable to the fabric high quality and low workmanship within the latest earthquakes”. PP 233-238. H. Hezen (2000) “ et al. Structural Engineering Reconnaissance of the Kocaeli (Izmit) Turkey Earthquake of August 17 1999” 35 KEYDER, C. , ed. (1999),” Istanbul: Between the World and the Native. London”: Rowan & Littlefield. Kinzer, S. (2001). Crescent and star: Turkey between two worlds”. Farrar, Straus & Giroux: New York. Kumer, Ronjit2005, Analysis Methodology , “A Step by Step Information for Newcomers” (2. nd ed. ), Singapore. Particular person Educations. Leedy and Ormrod 2001. Accessible at http//www. individuals. uwec. edu (Accessed on 10th November 2011). Ozgen, Ok. , Torunbalci, N. , (1997). “Evaluating of previous (1975) and new (1997) Turkish Earthquake Codes when it comes to design guidelines and fundamentals of bolstered concrete buildings”, YAPI Journal, 192, 127-132 (in Turkish).
Ministry for Public Works and Housing in 1997 “Turkish Requirements” (TS) ENV 1998 1. 1-1. Four) Montoya, L. , & Masser, I. , (2000). “GIS in City Catastrophe Administration” Metropolis Improvement Methods(Three), 49- 52. Nisee Berkeley (2010), “Evolution of Seismic Constructing Design Observe in Turkey“ Avaliable at http://nisee. berkeley. edu/turkey/Fturkrch2. pdf ( Accessed on 19th March 2012). PARSONS, T. , SHINJI, T. , STEIN, R. , BARKA, A. and DIETERICH, J. (2000), ‘Heightened Odds of Web page 13Giant Earthquakes close to Istanbul: An Interplay-based Chance Calculation’, Science 288: 661-5.
