You’ll full 2 Journal Article Critiques on this course. For every, you’ll learn a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal article, written throughout the final 20 years, on a subject lined on this class and write a critique that may be a minimal of two full pages and not more than Three.
Journal Article Critique 1 is a chance so that you can critique an article on a subject about which you’ll wish to tackle in your Analysis Paper. Journal Article Critique 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2.
Journal Article Critique 2 is a required a part of the analysis course of in your Analysis Paper. Since you should have finalized your Analysis Paper subject by the point this second critique is due, it’s essential to choose an article that’s related to your subject. In case your article and critique present no relevance to the Analysis Paper subject, you’ll lose 10 factors out of your graded critique. Journal Article Critique 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 5.
Functions: In addition to making ready you for the Analysis Paper, the critiques have a number of functions:
- To show you to scholarly journal articles.
- To coach you to put in writing with readability and concision.
- To develop your potential to critically analyze scholarly works.
- To show you the best way to correctly make the most of the Turabian format.
- To enhance your technical writing expertise (e.g., grammar and syntax).
Particulars: For every critique, discover a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal article about 10–20 pages in size that covers an space on this course. Just a few peer-reviewed journals are the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Bibliotheca Sacra, Grace Theological Journal, and the Westminster Theological Journal. Since magazines (e.g., Christianity In the present day, Visions, and so forth.) usually are not thought-about scholarly, they don’t comprise the suitable articles to critique. Should you want help in finding a peer-reviewed scholarly journal article, please use the On-line Scholar Library Companies web site. You may additionally electronic mail the Liberty College On-line Librarian at [email protected] for additional data. The next are some matters you could wish to take into account in your critiques:
- Philosophy of Language
- Existentialism
- Christianity and Tradition
- Basic Revelation
- Particular Revelation
- Biblical Authority
- Biblical Inspiration
- Biblical Inerrancy
- Attributes of God
- Preexistence of God
- Everlasting Technology
- Windfall of God
- Divine Sovereignty/Free Will
- Predestination/Foreknowledge
- Theodicy/The Drawback of Evil
- Doctrine of Creation
- The Doctrine of Angels
- The Picture of God in Man
- Whole Depravity
- Trichotomy/Dichotomy
- Traducianism
- The Fall of Man Search for articles based mostly on this
- The Doctrine of Sin
Learn the article you choose after which write a minimal of two full pages and not more than Three pages. You’re anticipated to learn the articles with a essential eye and to work together with the writer’s theology and worldview. Since you aren’t thought-about an authority, it’s essential to withhold private references, opinions, attitudes, and values from the critiquing course of. Please comply with this template when writing every critique:
Title Web page
Contents Web page (Part headings ought to be as follows: Introduction, Temporary Abstract, Vital Interplay, Conclusion, Chosen Bibliography, See LBTS Writing Information, p. ii)
The physique of your critique contains the next sections:
I. Introduction (1 paragraph)
A. Present a objective assertion.
B. Present a short overview of the paper’s contents.
II. Temporary Abstract (1 paragraph)
A. Seize the thesis of the article.
B. Share the general content material of the article.
III. Vital Interplay (1–2 paragraphs)
A. The purpose will not be whether or not you agree with the writer’s standpoint, however that you simply acknowledge what the writer is discussing and what theological points are at stake.
B. It’s important so that you can doc your evaluation of the writer all through. Should you consider the writer’s opinion, give an instance together with an endnote to designate an outdoor supply the place the opinion will be noticed.
C. Does the writer method the topic with any presuppositions/or biases?
D. With what theological and biblical views does he/she method the topic?
E. What’s the writer’s objective?
F. Has the writer developed his/her thesis logically?
G. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the writer’s arguments?
H. Did the writer show his/her thesis?
I. What are some purposes that come up from this text?
IV. Conclusion (1 paragraph)
A. That is the place you wrap up your work by conveying how nicely the writer achieved his/her objectives. Very briefly summarize your evaluations right here.
B. Does the writer depart you with any questions? If that’s the case, what are they?
Chosen Bibliography (on a separate web page)
The minimal of two full pages to not exceed Three-page requirement refers back to the Introduction, Temporary Abstract, Vital Interplay, and Conclusion sections. It doesn’t embody the Cowl web page, Contents web page, or Chosen Bibliography. In case your critique exceeds the Three-page requirement for sections I–IV, your grade can be diminished.
Formatting Necessities: Be certain your critiques are formatted within the following method:
- Comply with Turabian type[1] (as specified within the Turabian handbook) for the critique (See the “LBTS Writing Information” for most well-liked Seminary Turabian requirements).
- Use footnotes to doc analysis statements.
- Use 1” margins throughout.
- Make textual content double-spaced.
- Use 12-point Instances New Roman font.
- Indent the first line of a paragraph ½ inch.
- Don’t insert any further traces or further factors between paragraphs.
- Embody a canopy web page, following the JAC Pattern Cowl Web page in Blackboard for type.
Grading: Seek the advice of the Journal Article Critique Grading Rubric to see how you may be graded for every critique. College students sometimes lose essentially the most factors within the Vital Interplay part. For no matter motive, some college students have hassle discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
[1]Kate L. Turabian, A Handbook for Homework help – Writers of Analysis Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, seventh ed. (Chicago: College of Chicago Press, 2003).
