Posted: March 1st, 2022
Comparison and Contrast of Chief Justices Chief Justices Earl Warren
Summary of the “Comparison and Contrast of Chief Justices Chief Justices Earl Warren and Chief Justice William Rehnquist” Essay
The essay looks into the two justices who run the United States Supreme Court during the twentieth century. The two individuals were complete opposites in their philosophies but had a similar purpose. The main objective is to strike a balance between the protection of public safety and the protection of individual rights and liberties.
Cases such as McNabb v. the United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943), Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), Mallory v. the United States 354 U.S. 449 (1957) and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) have been discussed to illustrate Warren’s actions to expand individual rights and liberties over increasing the authority of law enforcement agencies. Arren is considered one of the liberal chief justices of the Supreme Court. The paper also discusses Duckworth v. Eagan 109 S. Ct. 2875 (1989), Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991) and Roe v Wade 93 S. Ct. 705; 1973 to illustrate the conservatism philosophies preferred by Rehnquist. Each individual ensured that they demonstrated decisions which were in line with their beliefs.
Notably, the paper also discusses the various decisions the Supreme Court is making towards achieving the balance of public safety and protection of individual rights. Issues such as gun rights, the death penalty, and the monitoring of digital metadata have been pointed out in the discussion. It is important to note that the Supreme Court is still facing an uphill task in ensuring that all aspects are appropriately balanced.
Order | Check Discount
Sample Homework Assignments & Research Topics
Tags:
Comparison and Contrast of Chief Justices Chief Justices Earl Warren
