Posted: March 16th, 2022

Assignment help – Discussion: Are Coaching and Mentoring Synonymous?

Assignment help – Discussion: Are Coaching and Mentoring Synonymous?
Each workplace offers specific opportunities and challenges for coaching and mentoring. As such, many organizations have invested in professional development opportunities to remain competitive and motivate employees.

Worker competencies can be improved a number of ways, including through mentoring and coaching. You may have noticed that the terms mentoring, and coaching are often used interchangeably, but is this accurate? Are the processes and goals of mentoring and coaching interchangeable?

To prepare for this Assignment help – Discussion, pay particular attention to the following Learning Resources:

• Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially:
o Coaching & Mentoring – See Attachment
o Staff Coaching – See Attachment
o Mentoring vs Coaching – Mentoring vs Coaching: Which do you need? [2022] | Diversity for Social Impact™

Assignment:

Respond to at least two of your peers’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

• How does your list of characteristics compare to your colleagues’ lists?
• Do you agree that the situations identified by your colleagues are appropriate for coaching and mentoring?
• Why or why not?
• 3 – 4 paragraphs
• No Plagiarism
• Help write my thesis – APA citing

1st Colleagues – Natasha Mills

Natasha Mills
Are Coaching and Mentoring Synonymous?

The definitions of mentoring and coaching are close, and so are the goals of the two concepts. Both definitions involve training or advising someone in the workplace. The common goals between mentoring and coaching include an expression of the desire to be mentored or coached with the aim of achieving self-actualization, as well as enabling the coachee or mentee to identify with his/her strengths and weaknesses. Managers can capitalize on these aspects as a way of helping the effectiveness of the organization (Hunt & Weintraub, 2017). Despite the widespread similarities between coaching and mentoring, the two concepts have other distinct characteristics.
For instance, coaching is question-based, whereas mentoring is solutions-based (Adams, 2010). Therefore, effective coaches are those who ask open-ended questions to help the coachee identify the various available options, after which he/she selects that which proves to be the most suitable for the issue. On the other hand, mentoring involves the proposition of solutions by the mentor. The solutions usually stem from the mentor’s experience as it relates to the issue at hand. This makes mentoring a more fast-paced approach than coaching-based (Adams, 2010).
It is easy to see from the identified characteristics that coaching and mentoring apply to different situations. For example, coaching would be effective in a situation where an employee with a managerial position has demonstrated interest and determination to lead at a higher capacity. Adams (2010) states that coaching is medium to long-term. Therefore, an individual with such ambitions would require coaching to help him/her identify his strengths and weaknesses as a leader and the leadership strategies that he/she would use to steer the organization to corporate success.

Coaching is also appropriate in a situation where a top-tier leader has reached a point in his/her career where she/he feels stagnant by increasing the leader’s professional competencies (Hunt & Wentraub, 2017). Coaching will help such an individual clear any obstacles in the path of his/her success, renew hunger for personal accomplishments, and instill added confidence (Adams, 2010). Simply put, the leader will be able to improve his/her effectiveness and efficiency through coaching, leading to greater accomplishments and an ability to steer the organization into more success.

Mentoring would apply to different situations as well. Adams (2010) states that mentoring produces immediate tangible results, making it appropriate for situations with the shortest possible time frame. An example of such a situation would be one where an organization is failing and needs new leadership to help get it back on track. The organization may opt to provide mentorship programs for potential candidates within the organization to prepare them for the leadership responsibilities ahead of them, depending on who will show the greatest potential for success.
Mentoring would also be appropriate in a situation where an organization intends to start a new department or division. Mentoring involves guiding the mentee using the mentor’s experiences relevant to the situation (Adams, 2010). The mentee may draw from the mentor’s experiences certain strategies to lead the new division or department. Organizations always intend to see tangible results in the shortest time possible when it comes to new divisions or departments. Therefore, mentoring is the most effective approach in such a situation.

The five personal characteristics I possess that would help me in each activity include open-mindedness, the ability to nurture, good communication skills, a sense of observation, and analytical skills. These qualities will collectively help me select and administer the right strategy required for the situation. For instance, analytical skills and my sense of observation will help me know whether an individual I am working with needs mentoring or coaching. My nurturing abilities will come in handy in administering the selected approach. Good communication skills will help me steer the conversation effectively, particularly since the nature of the conversation determines the effectiveness of coaching or mentoring (Adams, 2010). Open-mindedness will be significant in adjusting the coaching or mentoring process in response to any changes that may occur.

Adams, J. (2010). COACHING V. MENTORING-Joe Adams joins in the big debate. Training Journal, 68.
Hunt, J. M., & Weintraub, J. R. (2017). The coaching manager: Developing top talent in business (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

2nd Colleagues – Maria Helwig

Maria Helwig
RE: Assignment help – Discussion – Week 1

Mentoring vs. Coaching
Prior to this assignment, I can honestly say I was not aware there were so many differences between mentoring and coaching. Bot mentoring and coaching have a meaning, “to train”; however, there is more to each definition than simply training an individual. Coaching is intended to be question-based and the coach needs to as open-ended questions. This allows the coachee to come to a solution that he/she believes addresses the situation best (Adams, 2010). On the other hand, mentoring is intended to be solution-based. “The mentor is able to guide the conversation in a manner that will enable the mentee to profit from the mentor’s experience in context with his issue” (Adams, 2010, p. 70). Mentoring is faster than coaching and will get results the fastest; however, if coaching occurs the right way, it is still possible to achieve the same results, it will just take a little longer. Both mentoring and coaching require that the individual receiving the mentoring/coaching has a desire for personal growth (Adams, 2010).
I think coaching would be effective in a career goals conversation and also when needing to coach through a performance opportunity. I approached me leadership about six months ago to discuss career opportunities once I earn my MBA. This is a regular topic during my one-on-one’s, and they are taking the time to coach me on how to build on my skills in order to advance to the next level. Having a conversation about a leader’s future provides an opportunity to think out loud and gain confidence to take the next career steps (Dausend, 2018). On the other hand, I have found coaching to be successful when an employee has an opportunity to improve their performance. I have some employees who are not living up to their potential; by having coaching sessions with them, I try to give them the opportunity to solve their own problems and seek solutions that they may otherwise not have come to without my open-ended questions.
Situations that would require mentoring in lieu of coaching are conversations regarding errors and helping someone to prepare for a job interview. I would mentor an employee on errors in order to come to a quick solution and rectify the behavior/mistake. This way I can guide the conversation to where the employee understands what they did incorrectly and work on a resolution going forward. In addition, I can use mentoring to help an employee prepare for a job interview. I can use my prior experiences to advise them on potential responses and what type of questions are typically asked in an interview. I will need to be careful though, as I have learned this week that I need to be cognizant on whether I have the appropriate skills to qualify as a mentor. I want to ensure those I am mentoring actually achieve the results I am assisting them in achieving.
In order to mentor/coach, I think an individual needs to be patient, open-minded, professional, intellectual and humble. You need to be patient to be able to sit and listen to the individual you are attempting to support. You need to be open-minded to conclusions they come to on their own with questions you pose to them; you cannot only impose your views on them. You need to be professional in the conversations you have with them, and intellectual to pull on prior research and experience in order to guide them in their decision-making. Lastly, a mentor/coach needs to be humble in that the conversations that are occurring are for both parties’ benefit and not intended to be one-sided.

References
Adams, J. (2010, January). Coaching v. mentoring. Training Journal, 68–70.
Dausend, L. (2018). 3 Coaching scenarios in the workplace right now. FlashPoint. https://www.flashpointleadership.com/blog/opportunities-for-coaching-conversations

Order | Check Discount

Tags: buy psychology essay, nursing assignment writing service uk, nursing essay writing, Nursing Essay Writing Service, nursing essay writing service uk