Order For Similar Custom Papers & Assignment Help Services

Fill the order form details - writing instructions guides, and get your paper done.

Posted: March 16th, 2022

NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations
NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

PA005: Assessment Instructions
Photo Credit: [Phil Roeder]/[Moment]/Getty Images

Review the details of your assessment including the rubric. You will have the ability to submit the assessment once you earn a score of 80% or better on all of the related sub-competency quizzes and engage with your Faculty Subject Matter Expert (SME) in a substantive way about the competency. NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Overview
For this Performance Task Assessment, you will select a population health program/policy evaluation that has been completed and assess the outcomes of the population health program/policy evaluation.

Professional Skills: Written Communication, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving and Information Literacy are assessed in this Competency.

Your response to this Assessment should:

Reflect the criteria provided in the Rubric.
Adhere to the required assignment length.
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) files, a completed Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis. Save the file as PA005_analysis_firstinitial_lastname (for example, PA005_analysis_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Instructions
Access the following to complete this Assessment:

Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Rubric

Research and select a population health program/policy evaluation report that has been completed and shared. Based on the population health program/policy evaluation you selected, address the following in the Population Health Program/Policy Analysis Template:

Describe the population health program/policy outcomes.
Explain how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation.
Identify how many people were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation you selected.
Describe at what point the population health program/policy evaluation occurred.
Describe the sources of data that were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation.
Explain at least one potential added benefit and one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the population health program/policy evaluation. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain which stakeholders were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation. Which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted? Be specific and provide examples.
Explain whether the population health program/policy successfully met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. Was the population program/policy successful? Why or why not?
Explain whether you would recommend continuing or implementing this population health program/policy. Be specific and provide examples.
Describe at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation. Be specific and provide examples.
NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations Rubric
PA005: Program/Policy Evaluations: Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations.

Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

Module 1: Program/Policy Evaluations
Complete the Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template and address the following:

· Describe the population health program/policy outcomes.

Learning Objective 1.1 – Describe population health program/policy outcomes

Description of the population health program/policy outcomes is missing. Description of the population health program/policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete. Response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the population health program/policy outcomes.
· Explain how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation.

Learning Objective 1.2 – Explain methods for measuring the success of population health

programs/policies

Explanation of how the success of the population health program or policy was measured is missing. Explanation of how the success of the population health program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the success of the population health program or policy was measured.
· Identify how many people were reached by the Description of how many people were reached by the Description of how many people were reached by the Response clearly and accurately describes how
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Rubric Criteria 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation selected.

Learning Objective 1.3 – Describe the reach and impact of population health

programs/policies

population health program or policy and how much of an impact was realized is missing. population health program or policy and how much of an impact was realized is vague or inaccurate. many people were reached by the population health program or policy and how much of an impact was realized.
· Describe at what point the population health program/policy evaluation occurred.

Learning Objective 1.4 – Describe the point at which an evaluation of a population

health program/policy occurred

Response of the point at which the population health program/policy evaluation occurred is missing. Response vaguely describes the point at which the population health program/policy evaluation occurred. Response clearly indicates in detail the point at which the population health program/policy evaluation occurred.
Module 2: Reports and Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations
· Describe the sources of data that were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation.

Learning Objective 2.1 – Identify the types of data used to perform and conduct population

Identification of data used to perform/conduct the population health program/policy evaluation is missing. Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to perform/conduct the population health program/policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to perform/conduct the population health program/policy evaluation.

Rubric Criteria 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

health program/policy evaluations
· Explain at least one potential added benefit and one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the healthcare program/policy evaluation.

Learning Objective 2.2 – Analyze added benefits and unintended

consequences revealed through program/policy evaluations

Explanation of potential added benefits and unintended consequences identified through population health program/policy evaluations is missing. NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations Explanation of potential added benefits and unintended consequences identified through population health program/policy evaluations is vague or incomplete. Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail potential added benefits and unintended consequences identified through population health program/policy evaluations.
· Explain which stakeholders were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation.

Learning Objective 2.3 – Explain stakeholders identified in program/policy evaluations

Explanation of the stakeholders identified in the population health program/policy evaluation is missing. Explanation of the stakeholders identified in the population health program/policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Response clearly and accurately explains the stakeholders identified in the population health program/policy evaluation.
· Which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation Explanation of which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and
reporting of the population health program/policy

Explanation of which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and
reporting of the population health program/policy

Response clearly and accurately explains in detail which stakeholder would
benefit most from the results and reporting of the

Rubric Criteria 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

that was conducted? Be specific and provide examples.

Learning Objective 2.4 – Explain who benefits from results and reporting of program/policy evaluations

evaluation, with specific examples, is missing. evaluation, with specific examples, is vague or inaccurate. population health program/policy evaluation, including a minimum of 2 specific examples.
· Explain whether the population health program/policy successfully met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. Was the population health program/policy successful? Why or why not?

Learning Objective 2.5 – Evaluate whether population health programs/policies met original intents and outcomes

Explanation of whether the population health program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons of whether it was successful is missing. Explanation of whether the population health program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons of whether it was successful is incomplete or inaccurate. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the population health program/policy met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting whether it was successful.
· Explain whether you would recommend continuing or implementing this population health program Explanation of whether the population health program/policy should be recommended, and the reasons why or why not, is
missing.

Explanation of whether the population health program/policy should be recommended, and the reasons why or why not, is
incomplete or inaccurate.

Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the population health program/policy should be recommended, including
an accurate and detailed

Rubric Criteria 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

or policy. Be specific and provide examples. NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

Learning Objective 2.6 – Analyze whether population health programs/policies should be continued or implemented

Examples are missing. Examples provided may be inaccurate. explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

Response include a minimum of 2 specific and aligned examples.

· Describe at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation. Be specific and provide examples.

Learning Objective 2.7 – Analyze how nurse advocates become involved in population health program/policy evaluations

post-implementation

Explanation of at least two ways that a nurse advocate could become involved in evaluating a population health program/policy after one year of implementation, with specific examples, is missing. Explanation of at least two ways that a nurse advocate could become involved in evaluating a population health program/policy after one year of implementation, with specific examples, is vague or incomplete. Response clearly and thoroughly describes at least two ways that a nurse advocate could become involved in evaluating a program/policy after one year of implementation, including a minimum of 2 specific examples.

Mastery Rubric No Yes
Exceeds Expectations: Program/Policy Evaluations
Learning Objective – Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations. Responses do not synthesize in-depth analyses of the outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations and the role of the nurse advocate post-implementation. Responses synthesize in-depth analyses of the outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations and the role of the nurse advocate post-implementation.

Professional Skills Building 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.
Learning Objective PS 1.1:
Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are highly distracting and seriously impact readability. Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting and negatively impact readability. Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.

Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.

Professional Skills Building 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

Learning Objective PS 1.2:
Organize writing to enhance clarity.

Writing is poorly organized and incoherent.
Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate.

Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity. Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
Learning Objective PS 1.3:
Apply Help write my thesis – APA style to written work.

Help write my thesis – APA conventions are not applied. Help write my thesis – APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently. Help write my thesis – APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
Learning Objective PS 1.4:
Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.

Vocabulary and tone are inappropriate and negatively impact clarity of concepts to be conveyed. Vocabulary and tone have limited relevance to the audience. Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice.
Learning Objective PS 5.1:
Analyze assumptions and fallacies.

Analysis of assumptions is missing. Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Professional Skills Building 0
Not Present

1
Needs Improvement

2
Meets Expectations

Learning Objective PS 5.2:
Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.

Assumptions are missing. Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument. Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
Learning Objective PS 5.3:
Assess multiple

perspectives and alternatives.

Assessment of multiple perspectives is missing. Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives. Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives.
Learning Objective PS 5.4:
Use problem-solving skills.

Problems and solutions are not identified. Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem. Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem.
PS006: Information Literacy: Apply appropriate strategies to identify relevant and credible information and data in order to effectively analyze issues and make decisions.
Learning Objective PS 6.1:
Identify credible sources.

Credible sources are missing. Some sources are credible,
appropriate, and relevant to the topic.

Most sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
Learning Objective PS 6.2:
Analyze findings from

relevant sources.

Analysis is missing. Analysis superficially reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or
purpose.

Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose.
NURS 5050 PA005 Program/Policy Evaluations

Order | Check Discount

Tags: buy psychology essay, nursing assignment writing service uk, nursing essay writing, Nursing Essay Writing Service, nursing essay writing service uk

Assignment Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-25% Off On your Order!

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Top Skilled Writers

To ensure professionalism, we carefully curate our team by handpicking highly skilled writers and editors, each possessing specialized knowledge in distinct subject areas and a strong background in academic writing. This selection process guarantees that our writers are well-equipped to write on a variety of topics with expertise. Whether it's help writing an essay in nursing, medical, healthcare, management, psychology, and other related subjects, we have the right expert for you. Our diverse team 24/7 ensures that we can meet the specific needs of students across the various learning instututions.

Affordable Prices

The Essay Bishops 'write my paper' online service strives to provide the best writers at the most competitive rates—student-friendly cost, ensuring affordability without compromising on quality. We understand the financial constraints students face and aim to offer exceptional value. Our pricing is both fair and reasonable to college/university students in comparison to other paper writing services in the academic market. This commitment to affordability sets us apart and makes our services accessible to a wider range of students.

100% Plagiarism-Free

Minimal Similarity Index Score on our content. Rest assured, you'll never receive a product with any traces of plagiarism, AI, GenAI, or ChatGPT, as our team is dedicated to ensuring the highest standards of originality. We rigorously scan each final draft before it's sent to you, guaranteeing originality and maintaining our commitment to delivering plagiarism-free content. Your satisfaction and trust are our top priorities.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Dissertation App, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.