Posted: April 14th, 2022

Community Partner And Resources

Instructions

Collaborate with community members, community liaisons, and/or members of health care team regarding your project. Identify these community partners and collect information regarding the assets and resources of your selected community, and how. Relate how they will be helpful in implementing your project. (These don’t have to be large organizations, but can be people instrumental to your project.)

This assignment will include:

1. Introduction

2. List at least 2 Community Partners and 2 community resources

3. Describe their roles in your project.

4. Conclusion

Additional Instructions:

· References (minimum of 2 references cited in the content)

· Minimum of 2 pages (not including title and reference page)

· Your assignment should be typed into a word document and formatted in Help write my thesis – APA style. The assignment must include:

· A title page and a reference page

NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric

NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

10 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.

9 pts

Level 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.

8 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.

7 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.

6 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.

0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

20 pts

Level 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).

18 pts

Level 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

16 pts

Level 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

14 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.

12 pts

Level 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.

0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

20 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10 pts

Level 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.

9 pts

Level 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.

8 pts

Level 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.

7 pts

Level 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

6 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

5 pts

Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

4.5 pts

Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

4 pts

Level 3

Assignment help – Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

3.5 pts

Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

3 pts

Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

3 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

2.7 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

2.4 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

2.1 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.8 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHelp write my thesis – APA

2 pts

Level 5

The required Help write my thesis – APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

1.8 pts

Level 4

The required Help write my thesis – APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

1.6 pts

Level 3

The required Help write my thesis – APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

1.4 pts

Level 2

The required Help write my thesis – APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

1.2 pts

Level 1

Several Help write my thesis – APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of Help write my thesis – APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and r

Order | Check Discount

Tags: best essay writing service, best nursing essay writing service, best nursing essay writing services, biology essay writing service, business essay writing service