Posted: June 28th, 2022

Bipartisanship and Reduced Potential for Conflict Under the Infrastructure Bill

For your second short paper, I want you to select a current event/news story (within the last six months) and write about how it is related to three or more of the following chapters we are studying in class:

Political Parties (ch. 8)
Campaigns, Elections, and Voting (ch. 9)
The Media (ch. 10)
Congress (ch. 12)
The Presidency (ch. 13)
The Bureaucracy (ch. 14)
The Judiciary (ch. 15)

In so doing, I want to you to reference specific vocabulary terms (bolded in both the text and in my PowerPoint slides) and/or Supreme Court cases (italicized in both the text and my PowerPoint slides). Example papers from students who earned a 100% on this assignment in the past will be provided as a reference.

Please include a hyperlink (URL/website address) to an article about the current event you chose. Please link the specific article, and not just the “front page” of the paper! I will only accept articles from the following sources, no exceptions:

The New York Times (www.nytimes.com)
The Washington Post (www.washingtonpost.com)
The Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
The Oklahoman (newsok.com)

Your paper must be no fewer than 500 words (approximately two typed pages, double-spaced, standard 12-point font) and no more than 750 words.
There is no specified format required for this paper. So long as you fulfill the required criteria, you may write a formal, academic-styled paper or an informal “opinion” piece (or anything inbetween). Please see the aforementioned example papers as a reference.

Bipartisanship and Reduced Potential for Conflict Under the Infrastructure Bill

Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Date

Bipartisanship and Reduced Potential for Conflict Under the Infrastructure Bill
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/06/us/politics/defectors-infrastructure-bill-squad.html

The article titled In Infrastructure Votes, 19 Members Broke With Their Party: The defectors who crossed partisan lines in Congress include 13 Republicans who supported the bill and the six liberal members of “The Squad,” who opposed it by Luke Broadwater and Zach Montague published on November 6, 2021 takes a deeper look at the dynamic relationship between the executive, the legislative department in the United States. The article particularly outlines the benefits of bipartisanship, and its advantages, in passing the infrastructure bill outlined by President Biden to cost the American taxpayer $1.85 trillion. In historic vote at the US Congress, the Infrastructure Bill was passed by a bipartisan congress making a significant milestone in President Biden’s administration. Broadwater and Montague (2021) outline that the three branches of government were formulated to prevent a general rise in partisan political factions and identifies that they have so far not been able to achieve this, especially during the Trump era.
However, the deteriorating state of America’s infrastructure has particularly struck a chord with the American society resulting in both political parties prioritizing the need to revamp the general American infrastructure, a key reason as to why the Infrastructure bill was largely passed in both houses by members of both parties. Political party members on both sides are elected into congress to pursue different interest and in so doing become embroiled in oppositional rhetorics. Biden, from the Democratic party, has faced many hurdles especially around passing the infrastructure bill without the very effective and larger domestic package to shape climate change emission, due to opposition from the opposition party; The republican party as well as within his own party.
Occasio-Cortez outlines that the Bill while effective will propagate in keeping emissions in the red; outlining a greater maintenance of partisan line by members of both parties when discussing the final details in the bill. All the same, without congress, Biden’s administration would not have been able to pass the Infrastructure bill. This is because the legislature provides greater congressional oversight to the executive and works to curtail its efforts which may be partisan relative to the prevailing administration. Party affiliation has been a major cause of the reduced conflict between the executive and the legislature. The two branches were created to be independent from one another in their dispensation of federal duties, and ensure accountability to their American voters. Members of congress are increasingly exhibiting clear partisan affiliations, and this goes through a variety of government functions and structures.
Within the democratic party arises a progressivist as well as a centrist faction of members who while are in the same party have different needs. Within the Infrastructure Bill is the provision of $550 billion set to offset the impacts of climate change on the environment, which most centrist democrats have been holding out support for. This has thus delayed the Bill from being passed, but majority of the centrist outlined that “they would vote for it no later than the week of Nov. 15, unless the Congressional Budget Office determines its costs are “inconsistent” with the $1.85 trillion estimate put forth by Mr. Biden’s staff” (Broadwater and Monogue, 2021). While most progressives have agreed to vote for the bill, Ocazio-Cortez a member of the Squad, made up of 6 members have outlined the centrists assurances to be not good enough and choose to campaign that the climate provision, and climate bill, as well as, the Infrastructure bill be passed at the same time. This has exposed the potential growing intra-party divisions within both political parties which could work to complicate further the relationship between the executive and the legislature.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: 150-200 words discussion with a scholarly reference, 200-300 words response to classmate discussion question, 250 word analysis essay, bachelor of nursing assignments, case study