Posted: June 17th, 2022

Chapter III Proposal essay

Here are comments just on Chapter III. You have a lot of work to do to ensure the chapter meets the requirements as outlined in the Dissertation Handbook. Please access the latest version of the Handbook from the Research Resource Center (you’ll find a link in the online classroom), and follow the guidelines in Appendix B that detail what should be in each chapter of the dissertation. Add the missing parts and incorporate the feedback I have provided.

Then, make sure you have the appropriate appendices attached after the References list. You must include as appendices all materials you will use in your study, like the participant solicitation notice or ad, the organizational permission form for the organization or agency from which you hope to solicit participants, the informed consent, etc.

For your proposal, you should have ONE References list. I noticed that you have a separate list after Chapter II. You need to combine the lists into a single list that comes after Chapter III and before the appendices.

Dr. S.

Chapter III: INTRODUCTION
This chapter focuses on the research method and design used in this study. Qualitative research focuses on information a research query as a humanistic or unwavering approach. Qualitative research is used to apprehend humans’ ideals, experiences, attitudes, conduct, and interactions. It generates non-numerical statistics. The integration of qualitative studies into intervention studies is a research strategy that is gaining improved attention throughout disciplines. Gibson et al. (2004) MISSING VERB “although as soon as regarded as philosophically incongruent with experimental studies, qualitative research is now diagnosed for its capacity to add a new size to interventional studies that can’t be received through size of variables on my own” (para 2). Also, the role of the researcher, study participants, and process for data collection are offered. Strategies for data analysis, verification of trustworthiness, and ethical concerns is presented in this section. This paragraph is not well-structured. It should either be a description of what is in this chapter OR it should introduce qualitative research and methodology. You have combined both. In this introductory section, you should simply state what the chapter will address.

To conclude this exploratory research a grounded theory analysis will be used to propose methods for impending studies. The grounded theory has fit, relevance and works and is modi- fiable when compared, conceptually, with new data” (Glaser 2014, pg. 317). The fact that it is based on conceptualization as opposed to descriptive what? permits Grounded Theory to produce theories that move beyond the time limitations of expressive typically based practices. This does NOT align with what you have said before. You must rewrite this section.

Methodology

The qualitative methodology that will be used in this study is interviews. Assignment help – Discussing or researching bullying in any aspect has a negative impact on victims, perpetrators, businesses, and leaders of that company A researcher must protect all parts of what?? unclear involved to eliminate

any more harm or distrust to those that may be affected by this incident. This method and analysis are chosen because surveys are a way to eliminate interaction between participants and each person can maintain privacy and answer the questions freely. Surveys are extraordinary for leading subjective examination since they can pull in such significant and differing criticism from respondents. They can even make analysts mindful of bits of knowledge they had not recently considered as a possibility. More recent, survey research has formed into a thorough
way to deal with research, with logically tried systems enumerating who to incorporate (delegate test), what and how to disperse (review strategy), and when to start the study and catch up with respondents (lessening respondent blunders and result. You are NOT conducting survey research. You will be using interviews to collect data. You will be using case study design to structure your study.

A progressively target strategy in accordance with legal standards, called Investigation, has additionally been created. Utilizing this technique, proof is gathered from both target and asserted culprit, just as from witnesses. While this approach may have high face legitimacy, the strategy has so far principally been utilized in applied settings and has in this manner not been dependent upon logical assessment. In most logical investigations that have inspected targets or victims, exposure to tormenting have been surveyed with (a) the accused’s in general sentiment of being exploited by tormenting (oneself naming strategy), (b) the accused’s view of being presented to a scope of explicit tormenting conduct (the social experience strategy), (c) or a blend of the two procedures (Nielsen et al., 2011). While using oneself marking approach, members are asked a single-thing question about whether they have been tormented. In a few investigations, respondents are given a hypothetical meaning of tormenting earlier of being asked whether they, utilizing the definition as a premise, would portray their encounters in the working environment over a given timeframe as introduction to harassing.

Qualitative research has three broad categories that include: observational studies, interview studies, and documentary/textual analysis of written document (Gibson et al.
2004). Each participant in the study can voice his or her own opinion and state facts about their experience with workplace bullying in the fast-food industry. This is vitally important to have the participants express their feelings as they relate to incidents they have witnessed or experienced, providing accurate and reliable data to use in the study. The best approach to this study would be the individual interview process. This process gives the individuals the option to express themselves in a private setting and share information that will be presented as anonymous. Conducting individual interviews will help to protect the participants’ privacy and allows them to work on his or her timeframe or schedule.

The term observational studies is used to consult several unexpected forms of non- experimental exploration wherein behavior is thoroughly found and noted. The aim of observational studies is to explain a flexible or set of variables. More normally, the intention is to gain a picture of specific activities of a man or woman, group, or setting. Observational studies are not the best form of data collection for workplace bullying. When employees are being observed, they tend to be on their best behavior and this form of study will not present reliable data to use in this research. Another downside to using observational study is that the
information collected can be both qualitative and quantitative. That fact that nothing can be manipulated or controlled eliminates the process from casual conclusions.

Documentary/textual research is a more expensive and extensive type of research. Documentary research is the process of using data that has been previously documented from? participates to form an analysis of occurrences. Use the of documentary study is to supplement material already found to support the study. Researchers that previously used this form of

research have found it to be more detailed and time consuming that added more time to formulated information to make it fit into data discovered by the investigator.
Why have you discussed observational and documentary types of qualitative studies? You have proposed case study research. How does that relate to these categories? I see nothing conclusive from this section of the chapter. If you are attempting to explain approaches you considered but did not choose to use, that’s different and you should introduce these research approaches that way.

Research Questions

Specific research questions to ask participants consist of:

1. Is there an impact of workplace bullying in the fast-food industry on the absenteeism of casual fast-food workers?
2. Does workplace bullying make an employee performance, attitude, and health worse on job?

These research questions are not the same as the questions proposed in Chapter I.

Role of Researcher

In dissertations, you should NOT refer to yourself using personal pronouns like I or me or my. Use informal third person and, when necessary and sparingly, refer to yourself as “the researcher” or “this researcher.”
The researcher of this study will serve as the instrument of data collection. I will combine a list of questions for the participants to answer, I will listen to the participants, think about each of their responses then decide if further questions need to be asked of them. My role is to gather data and build a picture of schemes and philosophies from each source. Data will be collected using individual semi-structured interviews, presenting each participant with a list of questions to answer in a specific timeframe. Each participant will submit the answers to their questions via email where I will collect and assess each to create an image of the issues that is currently being studied. During this process, the questions may or may not change depending on the direction the study can take. You can ask follow-up questions and you can ask questions out of order, but you should follow a study protocol that lists all the questions you will ask or each and every participant. After all data are collected the
researcher will create a picture of the incidents as through the participants’ viewpoints and not use sound judgment or bias.

Study Participants

You need to start this section with a discussion of the study population, the larger population from which you will identify your sample, your study participants. As a start, re-read Heitner and Sherman’s, Dissertation Field Guide, for information.
The researcher will seek 15 to 20 participants who will be asked to participate in semi-structured interviews. answer a list of open-ended questions to get a better understanding of their stance on workplace bullying in the fast-food industry. Participants will be selected through the LinkedIn site, the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) organization and speaking with some managers/leaders in the industry I am familiar with. Each resource will be able to provide a list of former managers or leaders in the fast-food industry with experience or knowledge of workplace bullying in the facility in which they worked. The selection process will be narrowed down to just fast-food industry participants since that is the basis for this study. I will try to have at least three different companies to participant to be able to compare the processes used in recognizing, eliminating or prevent bullying in his or her organization. Each business should have policies in place to aid in
these incidents, so this will give me a better idea of those policies and how they are implemented in the companies. Rewrite for clarity. This is not congruent with Chapter I. Eliminate references to yourself in the first person.
What are the qualifications for someone to be considered as a participant in this study? I don’t see any information other than their being a manager or supervisor in a fast food restaurant. Are you looking for a certain amount of experience, like at least 3 years in this kind of position? Think about what you need from your participants and describe it in this section.

Each potential participant will be contacted via phone call if anyone . In the process of contacting each member, I will explain the purpose of the study and how they
were selected for the project. We will briefly discuss the purpose, not giving away too much of the study and see if they are interested in contributing. Once confirmed, contact information will be exchanged for further questions if any and I will explain the timeframe for completion, ask what is needing from me for them to participant in this process and agree on how I can accommodate his or her request. You have not explained how you will identify potential participants or how you will contact them. You have not identified the criteria for inclusion of participants. The number of participants you have indicated in this chapter is different than the number of participants identified in Chapter I.

Using an interview process to collect data is the best way for the selected individuals to share his or her experiences in this study. This process will be conducted by supplying the

individuals with a survey list? of questions that will apply to the research to add value to information that has been gathered already. Survey research is defined as “the collection of information from a sample of individuals through their responses to questions” (Check & Schutt, 2012 you need a page reference for a direct quote. Better yet, eliminate the direct quote). Survey research offers a variety of ways for the researcher to enlist participants, accumulate data, and utilize an array of instrumentations. You keep switching between doing survey research and interview research. Which is it? Interviews will yield much more information because you can probe for clarification. Survey research, particularly qualitative survey research, yields static information.

Dillman, Smyth, & Christian (2014) recently, missing verb survey studies have evolved into a demanding method to research, with systematically examined approaches listing who to include, what and how to allocate material, and when to provoke the survey and observe up with nonresponse’s, so that it will make certain an excellent research process and results. Survey research is a way to obtain information for a large population in quickly. Conducting research is a timely and costly process so the best way to gather information in a sensible timeframe will be to provide surveys to the participants to answer open-ended questions is the best way to go.

Survey investigation may additionally use a spread of records gathering techniques with the most not unusual being questionnaires and interviews. Feedback forms can be self- administered or managed by a professional, may be viewed individually or in a group, and generally contain a series of gadgets reflecting the exploration objectives. Using a variety of recruitment approaches can help expand the sample size and warrant acceptable reporting of the proposed population (Check & Schutt, 2012). An example of this type of recruitment would be to select from a population of men and women who held leadership/manager roles and who can also invite subordinates (supervisor/shift leaders) with similar experience. This does not flow. You have switched from data collection to sample recruitment. Sample recruitment should be discussed fully before data collection.

Data Collection

The most common data collection approaches used in survey research are questionnaires and interviews. Singleton and Straits (2009) states that carrying out interviews is another approach to statistics assembly used in survey research. Interviews may be performed with the aid of telephone, computer, or in person and feature the gain of visually identifying the nonverbal response(s) of the interviewee and subsequently being able to clarify the projected question. An interviewer can use probing comments to obtain more information about a question or topic and can request clarification of an unclear response. properly collect the data, I will create a list of questions to ask each participant to see if they qualify to share in the research and if chosen, the next step will be to get some background information about the company he or she work(ed) for and understand the policies each have/had in place to protect, eliminate, and prevent workplace bullying in their organizations. Not clear what point you are trying to make here.

Once the selection process is complete, another set of questions will be distributed to each candidate to review and elaborate on. The interview questions will be sent to each person via email
The information I am seeking from the participants is their knowledge of any incidents of bullying in the workplace, how they handled the complaints brought to their attention, steps taken to prevent or eliminate the behaviors, action plan made that will provide training, and disciplinary actions taken. Interviews provide researchers with rich and detailed qualitative data for understanding participants’ experiences, how they describe those experiences, and the meaning they make of those experiences (Rubin & Rubin, 2012). Selecting the interview process for my study is the best route to take and will protect each participants confidentiality. How will this protect confidentiality?? Unclear. Distributing interview questions in advance may result in “canned” answers. You should consider simply creating an interview protocol and reading each question when you are interviewing the participants. Don’t distribute questions in advance.

Qualitative scholars can support the consistency of their interview protocols as tools by filtering them through the IPR context. “By enhancing the reliability of interview protocols, researchers can increase the quality of data they obtain from research interviews and furthermore, the IPR framework can provide qualitative researchers with a shared language for indicating the rigorous steps taken to develop interview protocols and ensure their congruency
with the study at hand” (Jones, Torres, & Arminio, 2014). To ensure the success of the interview protocol is to ensure questions from the interview align with the research questions, construct an inquiry-based conversation, allow reaction to interview protocol, and pilot the interview protocol. That’s a lot. Unpack the component parts and discuss them individually.

To better select the right candidates to participant in this research study on workplace bullying in the fast-food industry, I created a series of questions using a Likert scale to see if each person would be able to provide adequate information for the study. The Likert scale allows the researcher to get a better understanding of how each participant feel about the study. This can provide data about the selected parties and show if they will offer reliable facts to measure in the study.

When I the researcher feel that I have selected a reliable group of individuals for the investigation of workplace bullying in the fast-food industry I will communicate with each person the process that will take place in obtaining data and the timeframe in which to complete it. I will use the Survey Monkey tool to help create the actual interview questions that will lead the investigation of how each person dealt with, prevented, or acted against persons involved in the harassment of other employees on the job. Survey Monkey will help me to capture the views and voice of each participant with guiding information into the policies and procedures implemented in their businesses or organizations.

As the participants start submitting their responses, I will use reflective journals to put all information together in chronological order of events and align each section of the survey in a way as to tell the story of the participants from his or her point of view. I will not relay the information in a bias way as I would like to incorporate the actual feeling and thoughts of the selected members to ensure accurate data is given and is used to advance the investigation. Once a participant completed the survey,
The steps to perform in conducting this research are to first, I must select questions that are of interest to my study and a concern for me, understand the type of instrument that will be used and how effect it will be to the investigation of my research, building relationships with the identifiable gatekeepers (participants), once clear about study subject start collecting data, and
the final step will be to analyze the data. The term ‘pilot studies’ alludes all the on scaled down forms of a full-scale ponder (also known as ‘feasibility’ studies), and additionally the pre-testing of a specific examination instrument flying for example, such that a questionnaire or meeting calendar. Pilot investigations are an urgent component of a beneficial ponder configuration. Directing a pilot examine does not assurance triumph in the primary study, yet all it can build the probability about achievement. Pilot investigations satisfy a reach from claiming critical capacities Furthermore might gatherings give important insights for different analysts. There

may be a need to a greater amount exchange Around scientists from claiming both those transform and results of pilot investigations.
Procedures followed

This is NOT an acceptable overview of the steps that will be used to conduct this study. If you need an example of this section let me know and I will be happy to provide you with a sample from another student.
Qualitative research
Comprises of a study of minor number of people or places
Is steered in a normal scenery.
Is fixated on contributor viewpoints.
Main source of information collections comes from words and pictures. Involves prolonged specific commitment.
Concentrates on the significance of denotation for contributors. Contracts with active structures.
Contracts through fullness and involvedness and accepts that modification is endless. Uses a growing strategy.
Trustworthiness

You are missing a section of trustworthiness.

Ethical Concerns

This s an inadequate discussion of ethical considerations that apply to this study.

When a study or research uses human participants, ethical approval is necessary to investigate human subjects by the university or college board of ethics. This process will ensure that each participant rights have been explained and there is a clear understanding of what the expectations are for the study. The researcher must take into consideration the ethical risk of recruiting candidates and collecting data from each person.

Each question presented in the study reflects the knowledge each person has experienced or observed in the workplace. Since workplace bullying in the fast-food industry is not a positive action, the questions presented may cause some uneasiness to the contributors causing them to feel discomfort in answering the questions. Receiving approval from the Ethics Committee will help to ease any concerns of risk the participants may encounter during the process. The participants of the study had the option to drop out of the interview process or stay in for as long as they felt needed. To help protect each person and ensure privacy the participants will be given

the interview questions via email or mail. This protects the candidates from the employer or

bully knowing their interest in taking part in this investigation. The participants were also given a consent form explaining the process in detail and his or her rights to terminate the interview at any time. If the participants agree upon the specifics contained in the consent form, each person will sign acknowledging his or her understanding of the study to take place.

Data Analysis

You are missing a section on data analysis.

Chapter Summary

Chapter III discussed the research design and methodology that will be used to collect data in the study. The aim of this study is to explore sources, impact and influential factors of workplace bullying in the fast-food industry, coping mechanism of those affecting from workplace bullying. The qualitative approach used in this study will be inductive reasoning which is the submission used concerning prediction, projecting, and performance. The research process started with research questions, a description to data gathering and last, analyzing data to determine designs and concepts. Chapter IV will discuss in more details the data analysis of the study.

References

Al-Karim, S. (2013). Is this bullying? Understanding target and witness reactions. Journal of

Managerial Psychology, 28(3), 290-305.

Agervold, M., & Mikkelsen, E. (2004). Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions”. Work and Stress,18 (4), 336-351.

Akella, D. (2016). Workplace bullying. SAGE Open Journal of Workplace Rights, 6(1), 1-10. doi:10.1177/2158244016629394

Ayers, L. (2017). Employees bullying claims can bury your business. Retrieved from:

www.qsrweb.com.

Bano, S., & Malik, S. (2013). Impact of workplace bullying on organizational outcome. Pakistan

Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 7(3), 618-627.

Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organization Dynamics,18 (3), 19-31.

Bergloff, McKenzie L. (2015). Correlation between self-reporting of exposure to workplace bullying behaviors and self-reporting of symptoms of anxiety and depression (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.

Brousse, G., Fontana, L., Ouchane, L., Boisson, C., Gerbaud, L., Bourguet, D., Perrier, A., Schmitt, A., Llorca, P.M., and Chamoux, A. (2008). Psychopathological features of a patient population of targets of workplace bullying, Occupational Medicine, 58, 122-128.

Conn, K. (2004). Bullying and Harassment: A Legal Guide for Educators. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2011). The limits of workplace friendship: Managerialist HRM and bystander behavior in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations33, 269-288.
Davidson, D., & Harrington, K. V. (2012). Workplace bullying: it is not just about lunch money anymore. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 4. 93-99.

Dennis P. Duffy, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Employment at Will: The Case

Against “Tortification” of Labor and Employment Law, 74 B.U. L. REV. 387 (1994).

Devonish, D. (2013). Workplace bullying, employee performance and behaviors. Employee

Relations, 35(6), 630-647.

Djurkovic, N., McCormack, D., & Casimir, G. (2006). Neuroticism and the psychosomatic model of workplace bullying.. Journal of Managerial Psychology,21(1), 73-88.

Einarsen, S., Matthiesen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1998). Bullying, burnout and well-being among assistant nurses. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety –
Australia and New Zealand, 14(6), 563-569.

Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of

Manpower, 20, 16-27.

Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379-401.

Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44.

Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-model.

Scandinavian,7 (1), 17-26.
Fevre, R., Lewis, D., Robinson, A., & Jones, T. (2012). Trouble at work. London: Bloomsbury. Gardner, D., O’Driscoll, M., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Roche, M., Bentley, T., Catley, B., Teo, S.

T. T., & Trenberth, L. (2016). Predictors of workplace bullying and cyberbullying in

New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5). doi:10.3390/ijerph13050448.

Giorgi, A. (2012). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. Journal of

Phenomenological psychology, 43(1), 3-12.

Glaso, L., Matthiesen, S.B., Nielsen, M.B., and Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 313-319.
Glaso, L., Nielsen, M. B., Einarsen, S. (2009). Interpersonal problems among targets and perpetrators of workplace bullying. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1316-
1333.

Glasser, Barney G. (2014) Choosing Classic Grounded Theory: A Grounded Theory Reader of

Expert Advice, CA: Sociology Press, Mill Valley.

Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work study.

Work,21, 220-242.

Hauge, L.J., Skogstad, A., and Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others, Work and Stress, 23, 349-358.
Heidegger, M., & Dahlstrom, D. (2005). Introduction to phenomenological research.

Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hesse-Biber, S., & Griffin, A. J. (2013). Internet-mediated technologies and mixed methods research problems and prospects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
7(1), 43-61.

Hills, D. and Joyce, C. 2013. A review of research on the prevalence, antecedents, consequences, and prevention of workplace aggression in clinical medical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior; 18: 554–569.

Hoel, H., Cooper, C. L., & Faragher, B. (2001). The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status. European Journal of Work &
Organizational Psychology, 10(4),443-465.

Hoel, H., Giga, S. I., & Davidson, M. J. (2007). Expectations and realities of student nurses’ experiences of negative behavior and bullying in clinical placement and the influences of socialization processes. Health Services Management Research, 20(4),
270-278.

Hoel, H., Glasø, L., Hetland, J., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2010). Leadership styles as predictors of self-reported and observed workplace bullying. British Journal of
Management, 21, 453-468.

Hoel, H., Sheehan, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Organizational effects of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. H. Zapf. & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (pp.129-148).

Hogh, A., Mikkelsen, E.G., & Hansen, A M. (2011). Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In S. Einarsen, H. H. Zapf. & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (pp.107-128). London: Taylor & Francis.

Holloway, I., & Galvin, K. (2016). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Janson, G. R., & Hazler, R. J. (2004). Trauma reactions of bystanders and victims to repetitive abuse experiences. Violence and Victims,19, 239-256.

John Shields; Michelle Brown; et al. (2015). Managing Employee Performance and Reward:

Concepts, Practices, Strategies. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125.

Khan, A., Khan, R, (2012) Understanding and managing workplace bullying,

Industrial and Commercial Training. Vol 44, No. 2, pp. 85-89.

Kristensen, T., & Borg, V. (2003). Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ)

2003edition. Copenhagen: National Institute of Occupational Health.

Kudielka, B. M., & Kern, S. (2004). Cortisol day profiles in victims of mobbing (bullying at the work place): Preliminary results of a first psychobiological field
study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56 (1), 149-150.

Lewis, Jacqueline; Coursol, Diane; Wahl, Kay Herting (September 2002). “Addressing issues of workplace harassment: counseling the targets”. Journal of Employment Counseling. 39 (3): 109–116. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920. 2002.tb00842.x

Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at

work. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165-185.

Lutgen-Sandvik, Pamela, Tracy, Sarah J. and Alberts, Jess K. (2007) ‘Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree, and Impact’, Journal of Management Studies 44(6): 837–62.
Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2001). Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and

health correlates. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 10 (4), 393-

413.

Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Basic assumptions and symptoms of post-traumatic stress among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology,11 (1), 87-111.

Miles and Huberman (1994) tended to refer to variance maps as “causal networks,” and to process maps as “event-state networks” (pp. 101–171). This incorrectly equates causal

analysis with variance analysis; process analysis can also be causal, as discussed in

Chapter 2 (see also Maxwell, 2004a, 2011b).

Moayed, F. A., Daraiseh, N., Shell, R. L., & Salem, S. (2006). Workplace bullying: A systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7 (3), 311-327.

Namie, G. Christensen, D. & Phillips, D. (2014). 2014 WBI U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey. Retrieved from http://www.workplacebullying.org/.

Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2009). U.S. workplace bullying: Some basic considerations and consultation interventions. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research,
61(3), 202-219.
Namie, G. (2017). Work Should not Hury! Retrieved from: www.workplacebullying.org. Niedhammer, I., David, S., Degioanni, S., Drummond, A., Philip, P., Aquarone, D., …Vital, N. (2009).

Workplace bullying and sleep disturbances: Findings from a large scale cross- sectional survey in the French working population. Sleep, 32(9), 1211-1219.

Nielsen, M.B., Matthiesen, S.., & Einarsen, S. (2008). Sense of coherence as a protective mechanism among targets of workplace bullying, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 128-136.

Nielsen, M. B., Hetland, J., Matthiesen, S. B, Einarsen, S. (2012). Longitudinal relationships between workplace bullying and psychological distress. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38(1), 38-46.

Nielsen, M. B. (2013). Bullying in work groups: The impact of leadership. Scandinavian

Journal of Psychology,54, 127-136.

Parzefall, M.-R., & Salin, D.M. (2010). Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 63, 761-780.

Ospina, S. M., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing qualitative studies in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593–605. doi:10.1111/puar.12837

Pheko, M. M., Monteiro, N. M., & Segopolo, M. T. (2017). When work hurts: A conceptual framework explaining how organizational culture may perpetuate workplace bullying. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(6), 571–588.

Petty, N. J., Thomason, O. P., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Elsevier, 17(5), 378-
385. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004.

Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard Business Review, 91(1-

2), 114.

Ravitch, Sharon & Riggan, Matthew. (2011). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research.

Rayner, C., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2008). Mobilizing bystanders to intervene in workplace bullying. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying and

Harassment, Montreal, 4-6 June. Abstract downloaded from http://eprints.port.ac.uk/10353/.

Roscigno, V. J., Lopez, S. H., & Hodson, R. (2009). Supervisory bullying, status inequalities and organizational context. Social Forces, 87 (3), 1561-1589.

Salin, D. (2015). Risk factors of workplace bullying for men and women: The role of the

psychosocial and physical work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 69-77. doi:10.1111/sjop.12169

Samnani, A. K. (2012). Embracing new directions in workplace bullying research: A

paradigmatic approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(1), 1056-4926. Samnani, A.-K. (2013). Is this bullying? Understanding target and witness reactions.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28 (3), 290-305.

Santiago-Delefosse, M., Gavin, A., Bruchez, C., Roux, P., & Stephen, S. L. (2016). Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Social Science & Medicine, 148, 142-151. doi:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.007

Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007).

The destructiveness of laissez-faire

leadership. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12 (1), 80-92.

Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1-15. doi:10.1177/1609406915624574.

Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2004). The role of the bystander in the

social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities. In J. Devine, J. Gilligan, K. A. Miczek, R. Shaikh & D. Pfaff (Eds.), Youth violence: Scientific approaches to prevention (pp. 215-232). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Statistics of U.S. Businesses. Retrieved from www.census.gov. U.S. Small Business Association (SBA). (2016). About the SBA. Retrieved from www.sba.gov
Vartia, M. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of

its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27 (1), 63-69.

Workplace Bullying Institute. (2019). Work should not hurt. Retrieved from:

www.workplacebullying.org.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Zaccaro, S. J., & Dobbins, G. H. (1989). Contrasting group organizational commitment: Evidence for differences among multilevel
attachments. Journal of Organizational Behavior ,10(3), 267-273.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: custom written college papers, essay custom writer service writing paper, essay writer free generator, essay writing service online free, free essay typer