The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.
For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Some of the articles may be about quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analyses. A systematic review could be used to give background information about the proposed capstone project’s goal or problem.
While Help write my thesis – APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using Help write my thesis – APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the Help write my thesis – APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Change Topic (2-3 sentences):
Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
2.5 points
Article Title and Year Published
2.5 points
Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study
5 points
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
2.5 points
Setting or Sample
2.5 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments
2.5 points
Analysis
5 points
Key Findings
5 points
Recommendations
5 points
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone
5 points
Presentation
5 points
Mechanics of Writing
5 points
Format/Documentation
