Posted: September 6th, 2022

Implementation and Evaluation of Community Policing

Implementation and Evaluation of Community Policing

Implementation and Evaluation of Community Policing
Policing in America has undergone circles of criticism over the years following several incidents of profiling and discrimination. To improve police-civilian relations, revive public trust in law enforcement and reduced reckless shootings and misconduct by police, community policing agencies have been established. The government continues providing support by incorporating community policing into almost all law enforcement department agencies throughout the states (Segrave, 2017). There are many critiques, as many of the policies have not adopted formal systems to incorporate community policing were a lot of biased results from the law enforcement supervisors. Thus it is essential to adopt formal systems to facilitate effective evaluation systems.
In the past, the performance of community policing polices was done by evaluating the levels of crimes in a specific region after the implementation of the community policing practices in the law enforcement department. The analysis of statistics from the various agencies such as the FBI Uniform Crime Reports and the department of justice’s National crime Victimization Survey determine if the community policing polices are effective (Helfgott, 2018).
There is no distinct universally accepted method of evaluating community policing. The process of implementing and evaluating community policing is complicated as it remains multifaceted and diverse. While other, it is difficult to evaluate community policing’s performance using empirical research principles; however, there are alternative strategies to ascertain the performance of community performance in the following aspects (Diamond, 2016). Firstly, the quality of contact with law enforcement officers and the community. Secondly, the community cohesion and their fear of policing and finally their perception of crimes.
Community-oriented policing services play an inoperative role in aiding law enforcement agencies to implement and evaluate these programs. Through COPS, they offer resources and grants to finance these agencies to implement and evaluate community policing policies. Being a component of the department of justice, they came up with a CP-SAT, a web-based assessment tool to provide invaluable feedback on the community policing units’ progress and performance (Diamond, 2016). This assessment makes it easy to single out the strengths and weaknesses and works towards improvement. Moreover, self -assessments techniques enhance law enforcement officers’ proactive performance to boost their performance index.
Another effective method of evaluating community policing is by setting goals and missions after implementation. After the goals are set, law enforcement officers and specific members of the community are assigned specific roles. Every player’s specific participation makes the evaluation process less tedious as this influences commitment in the effort to accomplish the goals (Crowl, 2017). For the public, community policing apps have been introduced to give their feedback regarding the performance of the community policing policies. This feedbacks are very imperative in gauging and evaluating community policing.
Conclusion
Community policing is part of the policing reforms in America focusing on creating a cordial relationship between policing and members of the relationship, thus improving public trust by creating a bond as they engage with members of the community on matters crimes and preventing the crime. It is critical to crime prevention rather than response, thus facilitating the creation of a safe environment for the community members. To ascertain their effectiveness, regular evaluations are essential following their implementation to ascertain their performance and areas of improvement if need be.
References
Crowl, J. N. (2017). The effect of community policing on fear and crime reduction, police legitimacy and job satisfaction: an empirical review of the evidence. Police Practice and Research, 18(5), 449-462.
Diamond, D., & Weiss, D. M. (2016). Advancing community policing through community governance: A framework document.
Helfgott, J. B., Parkin, W. S., Danner, J., Goodwin, G., Bray, B., Schuur, K., & Yap, C. (2018). Seattle Police Department’s Micro Community Policing Plans: Implementation Evaluation.
Segrave, M., & Ratcliffe, J. (2017). Community policing: A descriptive overview.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Implementation and Evaluation of Community Policing