Posted: September 10th, 2022

“Why alternative energy and fuels?”

Answer the following questions and limit your response to 500 words per question.
1. Provide three examples answering the chapter’s question “Why alternative energy and fuels?” You must include a rationale for each example explaining why it answers the question.
2. In your own words describe 1) potential energy 2) kinetic energy 3) total energy? How are they related to each other?
Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Excels in responding to assignment. Interesting, demonstrates sophistication of thought. Central idea/thesis is clearly communicated, worth developing; limited enough to be manageable. Paper recognizes some complexity of its thesis: may acknowledge its contradictions, qualifications, or limits and follow out their logical implications. Understands and critically evaluates its sources, appropriately limits and defines terms. 4 pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: A solid paper, responding appropriately to assignment. Clearly states a thesis/central idea, but may have minor lapses in development. Begins to acknowledge the complexity of central idea and the possibility of other points of view. Shows careful reading of sources, but may not evaluate them critically. Attempts to define terms, not always successfully. 3 pts
AVERAGE: Adequate but weaker and less effective, possibly responding less well to assignment. Presents central idea in general terms, often depending on platitudes or cliches. Usually does not acknowledge other views. Shows basic comprehension of sources, perhaps with lapses in understanding. If it defines terms, often depends on dictionary definitions. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Does not respond to the assignment, lacks a thesis or central idea, and may neglect to use sources where necessary. 0 pts
FAILING: Does not respond to the assignment, lacks a thesis or central idea, and may neglect to use sources where necessary.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Coherence 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper’s subject, purpose, audience, thesis, and disciplinary field. Sophisticated transitional sentences often develop one idea from the previous one or identify their logical relations. It guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas. 4 pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses fairly sophisticated transitional devices; e.g., may move from least to more important idea. Some logical links may be faulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to paper’s central idea. 3 pts
AVERAGE: May list ideas or arrange them randomly rather than using any evident logical structure. May use transitions, but they are likely to be sequential (first, second, third) rather than logic-based. While each paragraph may relate to central idea, logic is not always clear. Paragraphs have topic sentences but may be overly general, and arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may lack coherence. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: May have random organization, lacking internal paragraph coherence and using few or inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or main ideas, or may be too general or too specific to be effective. Paragraphs may not all relate to paper’s thesis. 0 pts
FAILING: No appreciable organization; lacks transitions and coherence.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Uses evidence appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient evidence and explanation to convince. 4 pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of evidence. begins to interpret the evidence and explain connections between evidence and main ideas. Its examples bear some relevance. 3 pts
AVERAGE: Often uses generalizations to support its points. May use examples, but they may be obvious or not relevant. Often depends on unsupported opinion or personal experience, or assumes that evidence speaks for itself and needs no application to the point being discussed. Often has lapses in logic. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Depends on cliches or overgeneralizations for support, or offers little evidence of any kind. May be personal narrative rather than essay, or summary rather than analysis. 0 pts
FAILING: Uses irrelevant details or lacks supporting evidence entirely. May be unduly brief.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits paper’s audience and purpose. Sentences are varied, yet clearly structured and carefully focused, not long and rambling. 4 pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may sometimes be too general. Sentences generally clear, well structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. 3 pts
AVERAGE: Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: May be too vague and abstract, or very personal and specific. Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence structure is simple or monotonous. 0 pts
FAILING: Usually contains many awkward sentences, misuses words, employs inappropriate language.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. 4 pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but not impede understanding. 3 pts
AVERAGE: Contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader’s understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts. 0 pts
FAILING: Contains so many mechanical errors that it is impossible for the reader to follow the thinking from sentence to sentence.
5 pts
Total Points: 25

Order | Check Discount

Tags: “Why alternative energy and fuels?”