Posted: October 7th, 2022

Predicting the future of Cyber SRM and the impacts of new technologies

Course work: Predicting the future of Cyber SRM and the impacts of new technologies
Computer Sciences and Information Technology
Topic:
Predicting the future of Cyber SRM and the impacts of new technologies

Course work: Predicting the future of Cyber SRM and the impacts of new technologies
Cyber threats have constantly changed and advanced dangers to organizational operations and function; thus, the affected parties need to adopt relevant and appropriate cyber Security Risk Management to counter potential threats in the current and future times. The cyber threats are dynamic, ever-evolving, and have consistently adopted new technologies and innovations to make the cyber-attacks effective and efficient (Jang and Nepal, 2014). The changing aspect of cyber threats and attacks has resulted in new attack opportunities for hackers and attackers. The changes in cybersecurity threats gas resulted in emerging risks in cybersecurity, and thus there is a need to effectively prevent them. The emerging cyber risks are predicted to ensure that the affected organization prepare for the future by adopting the relevant countermeasures.
Emerging domains
The changing cyber threats have resulted in the rise of different domains that are the foundations of attacks, and thus they should be the foundations of developing counter attacks. The emerging domains are directed towards the countering of the perceived threats. In this regard, there is the regular evaluation, assessment, and fixing of vulnerabilities existing in the system domain. The vulnerabilities in the system entail the system’s weaknesses that are subject to be exploited by attackers and hackers to launch an attack; thus, such vulnerabilities need to be fixed as soon as they are detected (Piantadosi, Scalabrino and Oliveto, 2019). Consequently, the establishment of fixing the vulnerability domain will significantly influence cybersecurity and standards by requiring organizations to conduct a regular assessment of the system to detect and address the existing system vulnerabilities. Moreover, this vulnerability fixing domain’s underlying technology entails the intrusion and detection software that detects weaknesses or intrusion attempts, thus addressing them in good time.
The emerging domain of the enterprise-wide data security governance program has been developed to counter different data breaches. The DSG is tasked with protecting corporate data through the adoption of specified policies and processes of handling. The governance of data is adopted to counter disasters from happening (Mishra, 2015). The DSG adoption can be adopted across the globe in two and a half years to ensure that corporate data is safeguarded. Consequently, the DSG program will ensure that cybersecurity counter and supporting standards measures are effectively enhanced in the interest of protecting corporate resources and data. Additionally, the DSG’s underlying technology entails the use of Continuous Adaptive Risk and Trust Assessment (CARTA) that chooses the security policy rules and controls that prioritize business risks to counter risks.
The Runtime application self-protection (RASP) domains have been adopted to enhance self-testing, self-protection, and self-diagnosing technologies. The RASP consistently evaluates the system operation to detect and prevent threats and risks, thus offering continuous protection and detection (Cisar and Cisar, 2016). The RASP has positively impacted the cybersecurity world by ensuring the system operation is constantly monitored such that any threats arising are effectively eliminated in good time before it affects the system. The RASP raises the security standards, ensuring that the users that the system is consistently and closely monitored to eliminate the arising threats. The RASP’s underlying technology entails a running application located in the server to intercept all operations in the system, thus enhancing their safety and validating operations. This RASP domain ensures that the system operation is monitored and assessed at all times.
The organization needs to incorporate the application deployment roadmap to ensure that cyber-security incidences and data breaches are prevented in customer and data migration. The deployment and movement of data and information under the cloud computing technology pose a risk to the data due to the weakness and issues arising in the deployment process (Vobugari et al., 2013). The application deployment roadmap domain considers the different cyber-attack scenarios, ensuring that the deployment is implemented successfully. The world needs to adopt the application deployment roadmap within one year due to its urgency and need to protect data on transit. The underlying application deployment roadmap techno9logy involved applying a web application firewall (WAF), secure web gateway, and network firewall. The different protective mechanisms ensure that deployment operations that are subject to cyber-attacks are effectively protected.
The authentication standard domain has emerged, requiring the operations, process, and individual to be evaluated and assessed as a matter of access control. The authentication standards are implemented to increase security and lower the risk to the users of a system. The users have to be identified and authenticated before they access the system (Guidorizzi, 2013). The authentication standard domain ensures that cybersecurity is upheld by ensuring that only genuine and valid users can access the system. The standard authentication domain needs to be globally adopted within half a year to ensure valid users use that system. The standard authentication uses unique login and password systems subjected to an identity provider to allow or deny access to the system.

Conclusion
There are different emerging domains directed towards cybersecurity risk management (SRM) at different levels due to the changing and evolving cyber threats. Cyber threats keep changing and advancing, making the attacks sophisticated and successful, thus requiring the affected parties to adopt the relevant counter measures. In this regard, the SRM emerging domains include authentication standards, application deployment roadmap, Runtime application self-protection (RASP), data security governance program, and fixing system vulnerabilities.

References
Čisar, P., & Čisar, S. M. (2016, November). The framework of runtime application self-protection technology. In 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI) (pp. 000081-000086). IEEE.
Guidorizzi, R. P. (2013). Security: active authentication. IT Professional, 15(4), 4-7.
Jang-Jaccard, J., & Nepal, S. (2014). A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(5), 973-993.
Mishra, S. (2015). Organizational objectives for information security governance: a value focused assessment. Information & Computer Security.
Piantadosi, V., Scalabrino, S., & Oliveto, R. (2019, April). Fixing of Security Vulnerabilities in Open Source Projects: A Case Study of Apache HTTP Server and Apache Tomcat. In 2019 12th IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification (ICST) (pp. 68-78). IEEE.
Vobugari, S., Somayajulu, D. V., Subraya, B. M., & Srinivasan, M. K. (2013, June). A roadmap on improved performance-centric cloud storage estimation approach for database system deployment in cloud environment. In 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (Vol. 2, pp. 182-187). IEEE.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Predicting the future of Cyber SRM and the impacts of new technologies