To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.
Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.
References need doi or http I currently work in a psychiatric unit the majority of the population is homeless. Also in the past worked in the medical-surgical floor where we get all walks of life, such as homeless or wealthy patients
Free Essay Sample
Patient Involvement in Treatment
Working as a nurse has revealed many issues such as patient involvement. For example, I once experienced a patient who was well-versed with the treatment of pneumonia. The patient had contracted pneumonia before and thus they knew the treatment procedures. One of the issues was that the patient preferred an alternative of amoxicillin which he indicated was allergic to the body. I was grateful that I involved the patient in decision-making and drug prescription. Elwyn, Frosch, and Kobrin (2015) indicate that failure to involve the patient would have led to readmission or adverse effects due to allergic reactions.
The approach of involving the patient in decision-making was my first-time experience. It changed my perspective of handling patients who are informed about their sickness. I resolved to always engage a patient in decision-making. Additionally, the involvement enhanced the satisfaction of the patient (Pollard, Bansback & Bryan, 2015). The patient was crucial in the decision-making process since I had not carried out the allergic tests. Therefore, the patient was crucial in determining the best prescription drugs for their condition.
Patient involvement widens the scope of a treatment since the patient has an in-depth history of their disease. Additionally, the patients will inform a healthcare professional of what they prefer (Miller, Whitlatch & Lyons, 2016). For example, some patients prefer injections compared to taking drugs in cases where the two are exchangeable. In the case of the patient suffering from pneumonia, it reduced the medical error of providing drugs that have allergic reactions on a patient (Shay & Lafata, 2015). The experience taught me that it was important always to involve the patient in decision-making. The involvement provides the patient’s preference and crucial information that the diagnostic tests may not have revealed.
References
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D. L., & Kobrin, S. (2015). Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implementation Science, 11(1), 114.
Miller, L. M., Whitlatch, C. J., & Lyons, K. S. (2016). Shared decision-making in dementia: a review of patient and family carer involvement. Dementia, 15(5), 1141-1157.
Pollard, S., Bansback, N., & Bryan, S. (2015). Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(9), 1046-1057.
Shay, L. A., & Lafata, J. E. (2015). Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 114-131.
