Question description

Instructions

For your final paper, you have two topic choices.

You must
include, at minimum, three separate pieces of support from the course
material. The resources below will help you, and you may also draw from
any of the course’s weekly material. Follow APA guidelines for paper
format, citing and referencing.

CHOICE 1: View
the Tuskegee Study resources below. Choose at least two ethical theories
we have studied over the course of the previous nine weeks, and apply
them to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. A few questions you should address
in your paper:

To what specific actions and members do your chosen ethical concepts apply?
What guidelines were violated and how are the guidelines similar to your chosen ethical concepts?
How do the outcomes of the Tuskegee study affect understanding of the need for trust in the medical profession?

 

Tuskegee Study resources:

 

National Public Radio: Remembering Tuskegee:   https://monkessays.com/write-my-essay/npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1147234

Gamble, V.N. (1997). Under the Shadow of
Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care. American Journal of Public
Health. 1997 November; 87(11): 1773–1778. Retrieved from https://monkessays.com/write-my-essay/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1381160/

About the USPHS Syphilis Study https://monkessays.com/write-my-essay/tuskegee.edu/about_us/centers_of_excellence/bioethics_center/about_the_usphs_syphilis_study.aspx

How to Treat People Who Participate in Research: http://bioethics.nih.gov/education/FNIH_BioethicsBrochure_WEB.PDF

 

CHOICE 2: Social
justice is a growing concern as it relates to health, quality of life,
infant mortality, and life expectancy. There is growing concern that the
wealthy are getting wealthier at the expense of the poor, who are
getting poorer. Consider once again, the TED Talk from week 6 and the idea of inequality and application of the “Veil of Ignorance” 

Answer this question: “Is the growing wealth divide ethical?”

Choose a side: pro or con. You may not choose a neutral stance.
Review the videos below. You may use additional, credible sources of your own as well.
Address why you have chosen your stance, using support for your view from the weekly material and the videos below.

From the UNNATURAL CAUSES series:  Episode 7 – Not Just a Paycheck: Growing Wealth Divide Is Bad for Health

From the UNNATURAL CAUSES series:  Episode 5 – Place Matters: Living in Disadvantaged neighborhoods is bad for your health

From the UNNATURAL CAUSES series:  Episode 1 – In Sickness and In Wealth: There’s No Such Thing as Small Stuff: Being Poor in Louisville

 

Your final paper should be three full pages, in 12 pt. Times New Roman font, include a cover page and reference page, and be formatted according to APA guidelines.

 

Each
 paper is limited to no more than a 30% for the originality report.
Papers that exceed this limit will have significant point deductions.

 

NOTE: Before submitting your paper, use the interactive APA Formatting Checklist to make sure that you meet all of the APA Style requirements for this assignment.Answer the questions honestly, and you will be directed to resources to help you complete this aspect of the assignment.

 

Review the grading rubric  for this
assignment, and “Writing an Ethics Paper”  located in the Course Lounge.
All direct quotations and information taken from your sources must be
credited using APA Style®. Resources on APA Style® may be found in the
Hondros Library by clicking the “APA Resources” link on the left
navigation. Please use the following format when naming your Word
document: ETH200 YourLastName Paper 10-1

Published by
Thesis
View all posts