Order For Similar Custom Papers & Assignment Help Services

Fill the order form details - writing instructions guides, and get your paper done.

Posted: March 1st, 2023

Wk 5 Group Systematic Review Critique Assignment

Wk 5 Group Systematic Review Critique
Assignment Content article used for the group assignment.
Capacity for care: meta-ethnography of acute care nurses’ experiences of the nurse-patient relationship
file:///C:/Users/vctr1969/Downloads/Bridges_et_al-2013-Journal_of_Advanced_Nursing%20(1).pdf
Please use the red that is my assignment.
DATA EXTRACTION My Assignment
DATA ANALYSIS—GENERAL My Assignment

The paper will be based on –QUALITATIVE.
1.
Systematic reviews are the pillars of evidence-based health care and are secondary research, which is the development of a study based on prior research. Researchers compile studies into one review and conduct a thorough analysis of an issue. These reviews allow researchers to judge the quality of studies and make suggestions after replicating the research methods used. This method of research is popular in the healthcare industry, because it identifies solutions to complex issues, increases accuracy, and resolves discrepancies.

Read the open-access article assigned to your team using the link provided in the Ch. 29 toolkit.
o Atlantis, E., Fahey, P., & Foster, J. (2014). Collaborative care for comorbid depression and diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 4, e004706.
o Bridges, J., Nicholson, C., Maben, J., Pope, C., Flatley, M., Wilkinson, C., … Tziggili, M. (2013). Capacity for care: Meta-ethnography of acute care nurses’ experiences of the nurse-patient relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 760-772.
o Li, Z. Z., Li, Y., Lei, X., Zhang, D., Liu, L., Tang, S., & Chen, L. (2014). Prevalence of suicidal ideation in Chinese college students: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9, e104368.

Utilize the resources in the Chapter 29 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Meta-synthesis, and Mixed Studies Review toolkit as a guide to complete your systematic review critique. Box 29.1 in the toolkit provides critiquing guidelines.
Prepare an 8- to 12-slide presentation using Microsoft® PowerPoint® or a presentation tool of your choice summarizing your findings.

BOX 29.1: Guidelines for Critiquing Systematic Reviews
THE PROBLEM
• Did the report clearly state the research problem and/or research questions? Is the scope of the project appropriate?
• Is the topic of the review important for nursing?
• Were concepts, variables, or phenomena adequately defined?
• Was the integration approach adequately described, and was the approach appropriate?
SEARCH STRATEGY
• Did the report clearly describe criteria for selecting primary studies, and are those criteria reasonable?
• Were the bibliographic databases used by the reviewers identified, and are they appropriate and comprehensive? Were key words identified, and are they exhaustive?
• Did the reviewers use adequate supplementary efforts to identify relevant studies?
• Was a PRISMA-type flowchart included to summarize the search strategy and results?
THE SAMPLE
• Were inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly articulated, and were they defensible?
• Did the search strategy yield a strong and comprehensive sample of studies? Were strengths and limitations of the sample identified?
• If an original report was lacking key information, did reviewers attempt to contact the original researchers for additional information—or did the study have to be excluded?
• If studies were excluded for reasons other than insufficient information, did the reviewers provide a rationale for the decision?
QUALITY APPRAISAL
• Did the reviewers appraise the quality of the primary studies? Did they use a defensible and well-defined set of criteria, or a respected quality appraisal scale?
• Did two or more people do the appraisals, and was interrater agreement reported?
• Was the appraisal information used in a well-defined and defensible manner in the selection of studies, or in the analysis of results?
DATA EXTRACTION My Assignment
• Was adequate information extracted about methodologic and administrative aspects of the study? Was adequate information about sample characteristics extracted?
• Was sufficient information extracted about study findings?
• Were steps taken to enhance the integrity of the data set (e.g., were two or more people used to extract and record information for analysis)?
DATA ANALYSIS—GENERAL My Assignment
• Did the reviewers explain their method of pooling and integrating the data?
• Was the analysis of data thorough and credible?
• Were tables, figures, and text used effectively to summarize findings?
DATA ANALYSIS—QUANTITATIVE
• If a meta-analysis was not performed, was there adequate justification for using a narrative integration method? If a meta-analysis was performed, was this justifiable?
• For meta-analyses, were appropriate procedures followed for computing effect size estimates for all relevant outcomes?
• Was heterogeneity of effects adequately dealt with? Was the decision to use a random effects model or a fixed effects model sound? Were appropriate subgroup analyses undertaken—or was the absence of subgroup analyses justified?
• Was the issue of publication bias adequately addressed?
DATA ANALYSIS—QUALITATIVE
• In a metasynthesis, did the reviewers describe the techniques they used to compare the findings of each study, and did they explain their method of interpreting their data?
• If a metasummary was undertaken, did the abstracted findings seem appropriate and convincing? Were appropriate methods used to compute effect sizes? Was information presented effectively?
• In a metasynthesis, did the synthesis achieve a fuller understanding of the phenomenon to advance knowledge? Do the interpretations seem well grounded? Was there a sufficient amount of data included to support the interpretations?
CONCLUSIONS
• Did the reviewers draw reasonable conclusions about the quality, quantity, and consistency of evidence relating to the research question?
• Were limitations of the review/synthesis noted?
• Were implications for nursing practice and further research clearly stated?
All systematic reviews
Systematic reviews of quantitative studies
Metasyntheses

Order | Check Discount

Tags: custom essay, dissertation ideas, dissertation topic, essay example, essay topics

Assignment Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-25% Off On your Order!

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Top Skilled Writers

To ensure professionalism, we carefully curate our team by handpicking highly skilled writers and editors, each possessing specialized knowledge in distinct subject areas and a strong background in academic writing. This selection process guarantees that our writers are well-equipped to write on a variety of topics with expertise. Whether it's help writing an essay in nursing, medical, healthcare, management, psychology, and other related subjects, we have the right expert for you. Our diverse team 24/7 ensures that we can meet the specific needs of students across the various learning instututions.

Affordable Prices

The Essay Bishops 'write my paper' online service strives to provide the best writers at the most competitive rates—student-friendly cost, ensuring affordability without compromising on quality. We understand the financial constraints students face and aim to offer exceptional value. Our pricing is both fair and reasonable to college/university students in comparison to other paper writing services in the academic market. This commitment to affordability sets us apart and makes our services accessible to a wider range of students.

100% Plagiarism-Free

Minimal Similarity Index Score on our content. Rest assured, you'll never receive a product with any traces of plagiarism, AI, GenAI, or ChatGPT, as our team is dedicated to ensuring the highest standards of originality. We rigorously scan each final draft before it's sent to you, guaranteeing originality and maintaining our commitment to delivering plagiarism-free content. Your satisfaction and trust are our top priorities.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Dissertation App, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.