Reflection paper | Psychology | North Lake College

Reflection Paper Subjects with Grading RubricYou’ll write a 1000-1500 phrase response to your chosen paper matter from the listing beneath. See Course Define for the due date. 
This task is value 300 factors, or 30% of your grade. 
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Studying Targets:
College students will display their skill to assemble arguments about problems with each private and common significance. Their writing ought to display that they will assemble cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Evaluation:
College students ought to display that they will distinguish the related factors that type a logically coherent argument. They need to additionally be capable of assemble criticisms which successfully undermine, by way of using acceptable counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your task is to learn any ONE of the next 4 articles:
The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you’ll sort a 1000-1500 phrase response through which you handle EACH of the next factors IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What’s the writer’s important argument? 2) How does he help his important argument (proof, ancillary arguments, and many others.)? three) Do you agree or disagree with him? four) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of not less than two of the readings we’ve studied on this course (in chapters 1-9) to your evaluation. Make sure that to offer a substantive clarification of how the philosophers’ insights are related to the subject you’re discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are reasonably lengthy and complicated. The writer likes to make in depth use of his reasonably copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com helpful as you’re employed your approach by way of your chosen article. The aim of this essay task is so that you can display your skill to debate, analyze, and consider complicated philosophic arguments. I’m assured that the studying assignments, exams, and dialogue boards may have ready you for this remaining, and little doubt difficult, essay task.
Word: I solely enable one try on this task. College students who don’t totally handle all the elements of the task as said within the directions in addition to the grading rubric beneath should be content material with the grade they earned. 
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will probably be graded in response to the next rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The next requirements are numbered so as of significance for grading. 
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the fabric: The coed has accurately grasped a philosophical downside or query, has defined it precisely, and on the premise of a considerably appropriate interpretation of any texts concerned. Key phrases are used accurately. The essay reveals proof of the scholar’s unbiased thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Quick (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising not more than 10% of the physique of the paper), when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. The usage of block quotations will end in a extreme level deduction.
95 factors
2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There’s a clearly said thesis, and help for this thesis within the physique of the paper. Every paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph earlier than it. The argument offered is persuasive. The insights of two different philosophers are integrated into the evaluation.
95 factors
three.Essay fulfills assigned process: The essay addresses all the assigned query or matter, elaborating on vital concepts in passable depth, however with out bringing in something extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and gives readability for the paper. Vital phrases are clearly and precisely outlined. Every paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Quick (one sentence) quotations are sometimes used, when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. Not more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 
40 factors
four.Essay obeys requirements for good persuasive writing: the author reveals that she or he is snug utilizing philosophical language, and the prose is obvious, not awkward. The construction of the sentences displays the relationships between/among the many concepts mentioned. 
40 factors
5.Essay is technically appropriate: The essay has been fastidiously and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in full sentences, with punctuation that doesn’t mislead the reader. There aren’t any errors in spelling, grammar, phrase alternative, and punctuation.    
 30 factors
 

Reflection Paper Subjects with Grading RubricYou’ll write a 1000-1500 phrase response to your chosen paper matter from the listing beneath. See Course Define for the due date. 
This task is value 300 factors, or 30% of your grade. 
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Studying Targets:
College students will display their skill to assemble arguments about problems with each private and common significance. Their writing ought to display that they will assemble cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Evaluation:
College students ought to display that they will distinguish the related factors that type a logically coherent argument. They need to additionally be capable of assemble criticisms which successfully undermine, by way of using acceptable counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your task is to learn any ONE of the next 4 articles:
The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you’ll sort a 1000-1500 phrase response through which you handle EACH of the next factors IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What’s the writer’s important argument? 2) How does he help his important argument (proof, ancillary arguments, and many others.)? three) Do you agree or disagree with him? four) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of not less than two of the readings we’ve studied on this course (in chapters 1-9) to your evaluation. Make sure that to offer a substantive clarification of how the philosophers’ insights are related to the subject you’re discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are reasonably lengthy and complicated. The writer likes to make in depth use of his reasonably copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com helpful as you’re employed your approach by way of your chosen article. The aim of this essay task is so that you can display your skill to debate, analyze, and consider complicated philosophic arguments. I’m assured that the studying assignments, exams, and dialogue boards may have ready you for this remaining, and little doubt difficult, essay task.
Word: I solely enable one try on this task. College students who don’t totally handle all the elements of the task as said within the directions in addition to the grading rubric beneath should be content material with the grade they earned. 
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will probably be graded in response to the next rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The next requirements are numbered so as of significance for grading. 
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the fabric: The coed has accurately grasped a philosophical downside or query, has defined it precisely, and on the premise of a considerably appropriate interpretation of any texts concerned. Key phrases are used accurately. The essay reveals proof of the scholar’s unbiased thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Quick (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising not more than 10% of the physique of the paper), when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. The usage of block quotations will end in a extreme level deduction.
95 factors
2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There’s a clearly said thesis, and help for this thesis within the physique of the paper. Every paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph earlier than it. The argument offered is persuasive. The insights of two different philosophers are integrated into the evaluation.
95 factors
three.Essay fulfills assigned process: The essay addresses all the assigned query or matter, elaborating on vital concepts in passable depth, however with out bringing in something extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and gives readability for the paper. Vital phrases are clearly and precisely outlined. Every paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Quick (one sentence) quotations are sometimes used, when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. Not more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 
40 factors
four.Essay obeys requirements for good persuasive writing: the author reveals that she or he is snug utilizing philosophical language, and the prose is obvious, not awkward. The construction of the sentences displays the relationships between/among the many concepts mentioned. 
40 factors
5.Essay is technically appropriate: The essay has been fastidiously and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in full sentences, with punctuation that doesn’t mislead the reader. There aren’t any errors in spelling, grammar, phrase alternative, and punctuation.    
 30 factors
 

Reflection Paper Subjects with Grading RubricYou’ll write a 1000-1500 phrase response to your chosen paper matter from the listing beneath. See Course Define for the due date. 
This task is value 300 factors, or 30% of your grade. 
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Studying Targets:
College students will display their skill to assemble arguments about problems with each private and common significance. Their writing ought to display that they will assemble cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Evaluation:
College students ought to display that they will distinguish the related factors that type a logically coherent argument. They need to additionally be capable of assemble criticisms which successfully undermine, by way of using acceptable counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your task is to learn any ONE of the next 4 articles:
The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you’ll sort a 1000-1500 phrase response through which you handle EACH of the next factors IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What’s the writer’s important argument? 2) How does he help his important argument (proof, ancillary arguments, and many others.)? three) Do you agree or disagree with him? four) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of not less than two of the readings we’ve studied on this course (in chapters 1-9) to your evaluation. Make sure that to offer a substantive clarification of how the philosophers’ insights are related to the subject you’re discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are reasonably lengthy and complicated. The writer likes to make in depth use of his reasonably copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com helpful as you’re employed your approach by way of your chosen article. The aim of this essay task is so that you can display your skill to debate, analyze, and consider complicated philosophic arguments. I’m assured that the studying assignments, exams, and dialogue boards may have ready you for this remaining, and little doubt difficult, essay task.
Word: I solely enable one try on this task. College students who don’t totally handle all the elements of the task as said within the directions in addition to the grading rubric beneath should be content material with the grade they earned. 
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will probably be graded in response to the next rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The next requirements are numbered so as of significance for grading. 
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the fabric: The coed has accurately grasped a philosophical downside or query, has defined it precisely, and on the premise of a considerably appropriate interpretation of any texts concerned. Key phrases are used accurately. The essay reveals proof of the scholar’s unbiased thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Quick (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising not more than 10% of the physique of the paper), when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. The usage of block quotations will end in a extreme level deduction.
95 factors
2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There’s a clearly said thesis, and help for this thesis within the physique of the paper. Every paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph earlier than it. The argument offered is persuasive. The insights of two different philosophers are integrated into the evaluation.
95 factors
three.Essay fulfills assigned process: The essay addresses all the assigned query or matter, elaborating on vital concepts in passable depth, however with out bringing in something extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and gives readability for the paper. Vital phrases are clearly and precisely outlined. Every paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Quick (one sentence) quotations are sometimes used, when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. Not more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 
40 factors
four.Essay obeys requirements for good persuasive writing: the author reveals that she or he is snug utilizing philosophical language, and the prose is obvious, not awkward. The construction of the sentences displays the relationships between/among the many concepts mentioned. 
40 factors
5.Essay is technically appropriate: The essay has been fastidiously and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in full sentences, with punctuation that doesn’t mislead the reader. There aren’t any errors in spelling, grammar, phrase alternative, and punctuation.    
 30 factors
 

Reflection Paper Subjects with Grading RubricYou’ll write a 1000-1500 phrase response to your chosen paper matter from the listing beneath. See Course Define for the due date. 
This task is value 300 factors, or 30% of your grade. 
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Studying Targets:
College students will display their skill to assemble arguments about problems with each private and common significance. Their writing ought to display that they will assemble cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Evaluation:
College students ought to display that they will distinguish the related factors that type a logically coherent argument. They need to additionally be capable of assemble criticisms which successfully undermine, by way of using acceptable counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your task is to learn any ONE of the next 4 articles:
The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you’ll sort a 1000-1500 phrase response through which you handle EACH of the next factors IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What’s the writer’s important argument? 2) How does he help his important argument (proof, ancillary arguments, and many others.)? three) Do you agree or disagree with him? four) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of not less than two of the readings we’ve studied on this course (in chapters 1-9) to your evaluation. Make sure that to offer a substantive clarification of how the philosophers’ insights are related to the subject you’re discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are reasonably lengthy and complicated. The writer likes to make in depth use of his reasonably copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com helpful as you’re employed your approach by way of your chosen article. The aim of this essay task is so that you can display your skill to debate, analyze, and consider complicated philosophic arguments. I’m assured that the studying assignments, exams, and dialogue boards may have ready you for this remaining, and little doubt difficult, essay task.
Word: I solely enable one try on this task. College students who don’t totally handle all the elements of the task as said within the directions in addition to the grading rubric beneath should be content material with the grade they earned. 
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will probably be graded in response to the next rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The next requirements are numbered so as of significance for grading. 
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the fabric: The coed has accurately grasped a philosophical downside or query, has defined it precisely, and on the premise of a considerably appropriate interpretation of any texts concerned. Key phrases are used accurately. The essay reveals proof of the scholar’s unbiased thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Quick (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising not more than 10% of the physique of the paper), when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. The usage of block quotations will end in a extreme level deduction.
95 factors
2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There’s a clearly said thesis, and help for this thesis within the physique of the paper. Every paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph earlier than it. The argument offered is persuasive. The insights of two different philosophers are integrated into the evaluation.
95 factors
three.Essay fulfills assigned process: The essay addresses all the assigned query or matter, elaborating on vital concepts in passable depth, however with out bringing in something extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and gives readability for the paper. Vital phrases are clearly and precisely outlined. Every paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Quick (one sentence) quotations are sometimes used, when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. Not more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 
40 factors
four.Essay obeys requirements for good persuasive writing: the author reveals that she or he is snug utilizing philosophical language, and the prose is obvious, not awkward. The construction of the sentences displays the relationships between/among the many concepts mentioned. 
40 factors
5.Essay is technically appropriate: The essay has been fastidiously and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in full sentences, with punctuation that doesn’t mislead the reader. There aren’t any errors in spelling, grammar, phrase alternative, and punctuation.    
 30 factors
 

Reflection Paper Subjects with Grading RubricYou’ll write a 1000-1500 phrase response to your chosen paper matter from the listing beneath. See Course Define for the due date. 
This task is value 300 factors, or 30% of your grade. 
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Studying Targets:
College students will display their skill to assemble arguments about problems with each private and common significance. Their writing ought to display that they will assemble cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Evaluation:
College students ought to display that they will distinguish the related factors that type a logically coherent argument. They need to additionally be capable of assemble criticisms which successfully undermine, by way of using acceptable counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your task is to learn any ONE of the next 4 articles:
The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you’ll sort a 1000-1500 phrase response through which you handle EACH of the next factors IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What’s the writer’s important argument? 2) How does he help his important argument (proof, ancillary arguments, and many others.)? three) Do you agree or disagree with him? four) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of not less than two of the readings we’ve studied on this course (in chapters 1-9) to your evaluation. Make sure that to offer a substantive clarification of how the philosophers’ insights are related to the subject you’re discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are reasonably lengthy and complicated. The writer likes to make in depth use of his reasonably copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com helpful as you’re employed your approach by way of your chosen article. The aim of this essay task is so that you can display your skill to debate, analyze, and consider complicated philosophic arguments. I’m assured that the studying assignments, exams, and dialogue boards may have ready you for this remaining, and little doubt difficult, essay task.
Word: I solely enable one try on this task. College students who don’t totally handle all the elements of the task as said within the directions in addition to the grading rubric beneath should be content material with the grade they earned. 
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will probably be graded in response to the next rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The next requirements are numbered so as of significance for grading. 
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the fabric: The coed has accurately grasped a philosophical downside or query, has defined it precisely, and on the premise of a considerably appropriate interpretation of any texts concerned. Key phrases are used accurately. The essay reveals proof of the scholar’s unbiased thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Quick (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising not more than 10% of the physique of the paper), when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. The usage of block quotations will end in a extreme level deduction.
95 factors
2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There’s a clearly said thesis, and help for this thesis within the physique of the paper. Every paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph earlier than it. The argument offered is persuasive. The insights of two different philosophers are integrated into the evaluation.
95 factors
three.Essay fulfills assigned process: The essay addresses all the assigned query or matter, elaborating on vital concepts in passable depth, however with out bringing in something extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and gives readability for the paper. Vital phrases are clearly and precisely outlined. Every paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Quick (one sentence) quotations are sometimes used, when acceptable, to help the author’s evaluation, and a proof is obtainable for every citation. Not more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 
40 factors
four.Essay obeys requirements for good persuasive writing: the author reveals that she or he is snug utilizing philosophical language, and the prose is obvious, not awkward. The construction of the sentences displays the relationships between/among the many concepts mentioned. 
40 factors
5.Essay is technically appropriate: The essay has been fastidiously and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in full sentences, with punctuation that doesn’t mislead the reader. There aren’t any errors in spelling, grammar, phrase alternative, and punctuation.    
 30 factors