Contemplate the next assertion: “Within the conventional American nuclear household of right now, as soon as the couple has a number of kids, the spouse shouldn’t be employed outdoors the house. Quite, she ought to dedicate the vast majority of her time to child-rearing actions and “being there” for the kids. That is the very best setting for the event of wholesome kids in all senses of the phrase – bodily, mentally, spiritually, and socially.”
Alternatively, one might assert one thing akin to this: “Within the up to date American household, it typically takes multiple earnings to offer for the household’s wants. Thus each dad and mom may have or want to work outdoors the house. There may be little or no proof to recommend that kids who’re cared for by certified, attentive, and nurturing adults in a setting outdoors the house (e.g., a licensed daycare facility, a buddy or a neighbor’s household residence, an after-school program) develop as much as be someway deprived or broken emotionally, mentally, bodily, or spiritually.”
Select one in all these two views and write an essay of 750-1,000 phrases that summarizes the analysis proof in opposition to that perspective. (Thus in case you select the primary assertion above, you’ll search for proof that this assertion is just not correct.) You could use the Marriage & Household: the Seek for Intimacy textual content (Chapter 11) and the sources cited within the textual content, however you additionally want to make use of at the very least three scholarly sources to help your argument.
