Posted: March 1st, 2023
critical review
For this assignment select carefully THREE suitable published papers (original research articles) from journals in Healthcare Science and prepare a critical review of the experimental design and statistical analysis used (2,250-2,500 words).
The papers selected do not have to be on the same specific topic. Each paper should describe work carried out by a different research group.
Word penalty applies (excludes list of references):
2,500 – 2,700 words – 5 marks
2,700 – 2,900 words – 10 marks
> 2,900 words – 15 marks
On submitting your assignment, it will be checked by Turnitin.
Marketing criteria
Aspect
Information sourced & referenced /10
Appropriate texts/reviews /papers sourced for the topic
Accurately referenced [ HARVARD]
For each paper /80
Summary of paper findings (concise details of main i.e. most relevant points)
Critical comment on research hypotheses (well-defined specific and allows gathering of data suitable to accept or reject the statement)
Critical comment on experimental design (suitability of sample selection criteria, sample size, reduction of confounding factors, replication, randomisation, cross-sectional, placebo controlled, in-vitro vs in-vivo, proposed data analyses etc.)
Critical comment on data presentation (effective use of tables/figures)
Critical comment on data analyses (suitability of statistical tests used)
Consideration of Health and Safety aspects
Comparisons made between papers and contrasts clearly identified
Critical comment on conclusions drawn from each paper and the reasoning provided
Overall Presentation /10
Document quality -use of IT; overall layout
original assignment not plagiarized.
What We Offer:
• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professionals
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% money-back guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers
Order | Check Discount
Sample Homework Assignments & Research Topics
-
learning project-reflective assignment
-
Can you someone please help solve this break even points problem. Thank you
-
Critical analysis of a quantitative study-"Student perceptions of stress, coping, relationships, and academic civility:A longitudinal study" Directions Please follow the criteria below when reviewing your selected research article for this assignment. Address each of the Criteria I-VI and the related elements. Fully and clearly evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and/or gaps for each of the criteria with related elements. Provide examples from the study with evidence from literature, textbook, or other professional sources to support your analysis. This is an individual assignment. This assignment requires Help write my thesis – APA format for the title page, 2 levels for structuring paper, citation in text and reference page. Two level format would include the major criteria centered on the page, and flush left the element related to that criteria you are addressing before you present the analysis. Refer to the Critical Analysis: Quantitative Research Rubric [PDF, File Size 88 KB] for details related to grading expectations as you begin your assignment. The rubric also shows how you can advance your performance level beyond the expected Mastery to the Exemplary performance level. Criteria I. Background Information/Overview Literature: empirical, theoretical; primary, secondary sources; relevance to topic and interventions. Problem/Significance: issues, relevance, benefits, stakeholders. Purpose: intent of the study. II. Hypotheses/ Operational Definitions or Research Question/Definition of Terms Direction of study and type(s) of hypotheses. Types of variables. Operational definitions. Research question and definition of terms. III. Study Design Type of research design. Alignment of design to purpose and hypotheses/question. Rationale and relevance of design to purpose/hypotheses, research question. IV. Methodology Population: sample demographics, selection, assignment, sample size. Data Collection: tools/interventions, reliability, validity, relevance to the population. Procedure: rigor and relevance to question/hypothesis. V. Ethical Considerations Participant rights: voluntary participation, consent, anonymity, confidentiality, withdrawal, and protection from harm. IRB approval process at study site. VI. Analysis Statistical methods. Findings of the study. Inferences or limitations. VII. Implications Nursing and/or Healthcare Practice. Nursing Education. Nursing Leadership/Administration. Formatting requirements: Title Page conform to Help write my thesis – APA format. Use the headings from this outline when writing your paper in 2 level format. All references cited within the paper and on the reference page must adhere to Help write my thesis – APA guidelines. Note: All documents must be written and submitted in Microsoft® Word®. If written in another word processing program the instructor may not be able to open it, the formatting will be distorted and you may be asked to resubmit your paper prior to grading. Submitting Your Assignment: Submit your paper as an attachment through the assignment drop box. Be sure to click 'submit' after attaching your assignment. Check the course schedule for the due date. Grading Your Assignment: It is strongly recommended that you use both the Critical Analysis: Quantitative Research Rubric [PDF, File Size 88 KB] and the criteria for the critical analysis to assure you have addressed all the criteria. This assignment is worth 30% of your final grade. Compose your work using a word processor (or other software as appropriate) and save it frequently to your computer. When you're ready to submit your work, click Browse My Computer and find your file. Once you've located your file click Open and, if successful, the file name will appear under the Attached files heading. Scroll to the bottom of the page, click Submit and you're done. Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you post it.
Tags:
custom essay,
dissertation ideas,
dissertation topic,
essay example,
essay topics
