dissertation topic
September 15th, 2022
ACC00716 Finance Session 1, 2020 Assessment
ACC00716 Finance Session 1, 2020 Assessment 3: Business Case Studies 2 Due date: 13 May 2020, 11PM This assignment has a 25% weighting in your overall mark for this unit and focuses on content from Weeks 6, 7 and 8. The assignment will be marked out of 25 and marks will be allocated as indicated […]
September 15th, 2022
prq | Law Assignment: I need help writing a research paper.
Homework help – Write 150 word response to question below in bold. The two pargraph help understand the discusssion topic to help answer question in bold. Response to question needs to be in paragraph form writing style. Need to cite and reference to support answer given. Assignment help – Discussion: Goal setting is […]
September 15th, 2022
MGMT605: Strategic Management for Sustainability
ASSESSMENT GUIDE MGMT605: Strategic Management for Sustainability, Semester 2, 2020 Assessment 1 Assessment Artefact (Strategy thinking) Weighting [30%] Why this assessment? What are the types of employability skills that I will acquire upon completion of this assessment? Assessment Overview: The purpose of this assessment is to develop your theoretical understanding of the strategies, discuss how […]
September 15th, 2022
Psychometrics Validty and elaiability
Contents Introduction The selection of employees is one of the most significant tasks a human resources practitioner Is faced with. This affects the flow of employees entering and exiting the firm. Many Issues may arise If the recruiting process Is not In accordance with the South African Legislation, namely the Employment equity act and the […]
September 15th, 2022
MGT600 Management, People and Teams / MGMT6009 Managing People and Teams
ASSES SMENT 3 BRIEF – PART A Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams / MGMT6009 Managing People and Teams Assessment Part A: Video Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length Part A Video – 5 to 10 Minutes Learning Outcomes Part A c) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem-solving skills to effectively manage people in […]
September 15th, 2022
Individual Assignment: Exploring T&D in Practice (15%)
Individual Assignment: Exploring T&D in Practice (15%) The purpose of this assignment is to explore business practices related to employee T&D, good and bad examples, issues & challenges, and tips for improvement. All students must choose an organization in the UAE as a focus for this assignment. The following seven areas should be covered in […]
September 15th, 2022
BSBRES401 Analyse and Present Research Information
Student Assessment Pack Ensure this cover sheet is attached to your work. Student and Trainer/Assessor Details Student ID Student name Contact number Email address Trainer/Assessor name Course and Unit Details Course name Professional Year Program – CPW5 Unit code and name Reporting to Managers (BSBRES401 Analyse and Present Research Information) Due Date Submission Date Student […]
September 15th, 2022
Assessment 2 – Instructions for Report (Literature review)
SOAD9206 Version July-2022-HM Page 11 of 14 Assessment 2 – Instructions for Report (Literature review) There are several steps involved in the completion of a systematic review. You will be guided though this via information on FLO and during the 3 lectures. You will find many support materials on FLO to guide you. In this […]
September 15th, 2022
1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they have learned during the semester on project management. Course Learning Outcomes This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes: CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words (reference list included in word count) Due date: Thursday of Week 7, 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% 2 Assessment details Details You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you’ve learned about the project over the course of the semester. project management. You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals. You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric. The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list. Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case). Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research. A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results. Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission. 3 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin guide . Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Use RMIT Business (Harvard Style) for this assessment. 4 Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings Pts HD D C P N Question 1 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 2 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. 5 beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 3 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 6 Question 4 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Reference list and length An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Presentation is of a professional standard. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. One or two minor issues are noted but presentation is very good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Some issues are noted but presentation is good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Several issues are noted but presentation is satisfactory. References are incomplete/missing or incorrectly formatted and/or the report does not meet length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2 Total: 30 pts
1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they […]
September 15th, 2022
COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – Systems Analysis
COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – Systems Analysis Due date: Week 6 Friday (24th August 2018) 11:55 PM AEST ASSESSMENT Weighting: 30% Length: 1500 words (+/- 10%) 1 Objectives This assessment relates to course learning outcomes 1 and 5 stated in the e-course profile. Assessment 1 is an individual assessment. In assessment […]
Get affordable help with your assignment; it’s just a few clicks away!
Place an order